UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant o | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
||
Check the appropriate box: |
||
ý |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
o |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o |
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, AG | ||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
||||
ý |
No fee required. |
|||
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|||
(5) | Total fee paid: |
|||
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|||
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|||
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|||
(3) | Filing Party: |
|||
(4) | Date Filed: |
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, AG
NOTICE OF 2015
ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING
March [13], 2015 | ||
DATE: |
Thursday, April 30, 2015 |
|
TIME: | 2:00 p.m., local time | |
PLACE: | Corporate headquarters: Park Tower, 15th floor, Gubelstrasse 24, 6300 Zug, Switzerland |
ITEMS OF BUSINESS: |
||
![]() |
Amend the Articles of Association to change the company's Swiss registered office. |
|
![]() |
Amend the Articles of Association to define the duties of the Compensation Committee. |
|
![]() |
Amend the Articles of Association to define the company's compensation principles. |
|
![]() |
Amend the Articles of Association to limit the notice period in employment agreements with executive officers and agreements with directors, and to prohibit loans and credit to executives and directors. |
|
![]() |
Amend the Articles of Association to limit the number of outside board seats our directors and executives may hold. |
|
![]() |
Amend the Articles of Association to provide for say-on-pay votes required under Swiss law. |
|
![]() |
Elect the board of directors. |
|
![]() |
Elect the Chairman of the board of directors. |
|
![]() |
Elect the Compensation Committee members. |
|
![]() |
Elect the independent proxy. |
|
![]() |
Approve the 2015 compensation for executives as required under Swiss law. |
|
![]() |
Approve the 2015 compensation for directors as required under Swiss law. |
|
![]() |
Approve, on an advisory basis, 2014 executive compensation as required under U.S. securities laws. |
|
![]() |
Approve the 2014 Annual Report and financial statements. |
|
![]() |
Approve the retention of disposable profits. |
|
![]() |
Approve the payment of dividends to shareholders. |
![]() |
Approve the cancelling of treasury shares. | |
![]() |
Elect Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent auditor and Deloitte AG as statutory auditor. |
|
![]() |
Elect PricewaterhouseCoopers AG as special auditor. |
|
![]() |
Discharge of the board of directors and executive officers from liabilities for their actions during the year ended December 31, 2014. |
|
![]() |
Transact any further business that lawfully may be brought before the meeting. |
RECORD DATE: | Only shareholders of record holding common shares, as shown on our transfer books, as of the close of business on March 4, 2015 are entitled to vote at the Annual Shareholder Meeting. | |
MATERIALS TO REVIEW: |
This document contains our Notice of 2015 Annual Shareholder Meeting and Proxy Statement. Our 2014 Annual Report accompanies this Proxy Statement but is not a part of our proxy solicitation materials. |
|
PROXY VOTING: |
It is important that your shares be represented and voted at the Annual Shareholder Meeting. Please promptly sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card in the return envelope furnished for that purpose whether or not you plan to attend the meeting. If you later desire to revoke your proxy for any reason, you may do so in the manner described in the attached proxy statement. |
By Order of the Board of Directors, | ||
Wayne H. Datz Corporate Secretary |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
-i-
-ii-
In 2014, we continued to expand our insurance and reinsurance product offerings across a wide array of specialty coverages and jurisdictions. In North America, we further developed and expanded our suite of specialty products to meet our clients' needs. We focused on building out our Global Markets Insurance segment in Europe and Asia, including expanding our lines of business and successfully migrating in-house the managing agency for our Lloyd's Syndicate 2232. In Asia Pacific, we launched an Australia branch office and signed agreements to acquire the Hong Kong and Singapore operations of Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance plc ("RSA") to deepen and broaden our presence in the region. We also realigned our two business insurance operating segments in order to best serve our clients and trading partners.
In 2014, we generated net income of $490.3 million and our year-end diluted book value per share was $38.27, an 11.9% increase for the year. We had a combined ratio of 85.2% and underwriting performance benefitted from profitable growth across our portfolio of insurance and reinsurance business. Favorable reserve releases of $212.6 million, total return on the company's investment portfolio of $265.8 million and successful management of expenses also combined to contribute to our success.
On May 1, 2014, the shareholders approved a 3-for-1 stock split of the company's common shares. All historical share and per share amounts in this Proxy Statement reflect the effect of the stock split.
-1-
The following table contains key financial data for each of the last three fiscal years, including data as of each year end.
Operating Results
|
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
($ in millions, except share, per share and percentage data) |
|||||||||
Total Assets |
$ |
12,422 |
$ |
11,946 |
$ |
12,030 |
||||
Total Debt and Other Liabilities |
$ |
8,644 |
$ |
8,426 |
$ |
8,704 |
||||
Total Shareholders' Equity |
$ |
3,778 |
$ |
3,520 |
$ |
3,326 |
||||
Diluted Book Value per Share |
$ |
38.27 |
$ |
34.20 |
$ |
30.86 |
||||
Growth in Diluted Book Value per Share |
|
11.9% |
|
10.8% |
|
15.6% |
||||
Gross Premiums Written |
$ |
2,935 |
$ |
2,739 |
$ |
2,239 |
||||
Net Income |
$ |
490 |
$ |
418 |
$ |
493 |
||||
Operating Income |
$ |
415 |
$ |
364 |
$ |
203 |
||||
Total Return on Investments |
|
3.1% |
|
2.6% |
|
5.5% |
||||
Net Income Return on Average Shareholders' Equity |
13.4% |
12.2% |
15.3% |
|||||||
Operating Return on Average Shareholders' Equity |
|
11.4% |
|
10.6% |
|
6.3% |
||||
Combined Ratio(1) |
85.2% |
86.2% |
94.5% |
|||||||
Cash Dividends Paid |
$ |
77 |
$ |
47 |
$ |
68 |
||||
Number of Common Shares Outstanding |
96,195,482 |
100,253,646 |
104,493,343 |
|||||||
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding- Diluted |
|
99,591,773 |
|
104,865,834 |
|
111,209,655 |
||||
Repurchase of Common Shares |
$ |
175 |
$ |
175 |
$ |
264 |
Detailed information of our financial and operational performance is contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K that is included in our 2014 Annual Report accompanying this Proxy Statement. See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures included in the table above.
Company's Performance Relative
to Its Peer Group as of December 31, 2014
(In quartiles. 1=first quartile, the highest level; 4=fourth quartile, the lowest level)
Performance Metric
|
2014 (one year) Rank |
2012-2014 (three year) Rank |
2010-2014 (five year) Rank |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diluted Book Value per Share Growth (adjusted for dividends) |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
||||
Annualized Net Income Return on Average Equity (adjusted for other comprehensive income) |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|||||||
Combined Ratio |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
||||
Total Shareholder Return |
4 |
1 |
1 |
-2-
Shareholder Voting Recommendations
Our Board of Directors unanimously makes the following recommendations:
|
Proposal
|
Vote Recommendation |
See Page Number for More Information |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 |
Amend the Articles of Association to Change the Company's Swiss Registered Office |
FOR |
p. 15 |
|||
Proposal 2 |
Amend the Articles of Association to Define the Duties of the Compensation Committee |
FOR |
p. 15 |
|||
Proposal 3 |
Amend the Articles of Association to Define the Company's Compensation Principles |
FOR |
p. 16 |
|||
Proposal 4 |
Amend the Articles of Association to Limit the Notice Period in Employment Agreements with Executive Officers and Agreements with Directors, and to Prohibit Loans and Credit to Executives and Directors |
FOR |
p. 17 |
|||
Proposal 5 |
Amend the Articles of Association to Limit the Number of Outside Board Seats Our Directors and Executives May Hold |
FOR |
p. 18 |
|||
Proposal 6 |
Amend the Articles of Association to Provide for Say-on-Pay Votes Required Under Swiss Law |
FOR |
p. 19 |
|||
Proposal 7 |
Elect the Board of Directors |
FOR EACH NOMINEE |
p. 20 |
|||
Proposal 8 |
Elect the Chairman of the Board of Directors |
FOR |
p. 31 |
|||
Proposal 9 |
Elect the Compensation Committee Members |
FOR EACH NOMINEE |
p. 31 |
|||
Proposal 10 |
Elect the Independent Proxy |
FOR |
p. 32 |
|||
Proposal 11 |
Approve the 2015 Compensation for Executives as Required under Swiss Law |
FOR |
p. 32 |
|||
Proposal 12 |
Approve the 2015 Compensation for Directors as Required under Swiss Law |
FOR |
p. 35 |
|||
Proposal 13 |
Advisory Vote on 2014 Executive Compensation as Required under U.S. Securities Laws |
FOR |
p. 37 |
|||
Proposal 14 |
Approve the 2014 Annual Report and Financial Statements |
FOR |
p. 38 |
|||
Proposal 15 |
Approve the Retention of Disposable Profits |
FOR |
p. 38 |
|||
Proposal 16 |
Approve the Payment of Dividends to Shareholders |
FOR |
p. 39 |
|||
Proposal 17 |
Approve the Cancelling of Treasury Shares |
FOR |
p. 41 |
|||
Proposal 18 |
Elect Deloitte & Touche LLP as Independent Auditor and Deloitte AG as Statutory Auditor |
FOR |
p. 41 |
|||
Proposal 19 |
Elect PricewaterhouseCoopers AG as Special Auditor |
FOR |
p. 43 |
|||
Proposal 20 |
Discharge of the Board of Directors and Executive Officers from Liabilities |
FOR |
p. 43 |
-3-
Corporate Governance Highlights
The company is committed to strong corporate governance, which promotes the long-term interests of shareholders, strengthens the accountability of the board of directors (the "Board") and management and helps build public trust in the company. Highlights include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | |
Board and Other Governance Information |
2015 |
|||||||
| | | | | | | | |
Size of Board |
|
7 |
|
|||||
Average Age of Directors |
62.7 |
|||||||
|
Percentage of Independent Directors |
|
86% |
|
||||
Diverse Board (Gender, Experience and Skills) |
Yes |
|||||||
|
Majority Voting for Directors |
|
Yes |
|
||||
Annual Election of All Directors |
Yes |
|||||||
|
Annual Election of Chairman of the Board |
|
Yes |
|
||||
Annual Election of Compensation Committee Members |
Yes |
|||||||
|
Use of Independent Proxy to Represent Shareholders |
|
Yes |
|
||||
No Director Holds More than 3 other Public Company Board Seats |
Yes |
|||||||
|
Lead Independent Director |
|
Yes |
|
||||
Separate Chairman & CEO |
No |
|||||||
|
CEO Holds No Other Public Company Board Seat |
|
Yes |
|
||||
Independent Directors Meet Without Management |
Yes |
|||||||
|
Annual Board and Committees Self-Evaluations |
|
Yes |
|
||||
Annual Equity Grant to Non-Employee Directors |
Yes |
|||||||
|
Board Orientation/Education Program |
|
Yes |
|
||||
Number of Board Meetings Held in 2014 |
6 |
|||||||
|
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors and Executives |
|
Yes |
|
||||
Stock Ownership Policy for Directors and Senior Management |
Yes |
|||||||
|
Disclosure Committee for Financial Reporting |
|
Yes |
|
||||
Annual Approval of Executive Compensation |
Yes |
|||||||
|
Shareholder Ability to Call Special Meetings |
|
Yes |
|
||||
Policy Prohibiting Insider Pledging or Hedging of Company Common Shares |
Yes |
|||||||
| | | | | | | | |
-4-
You are being asked to vote on the election of the following seven directors to the Board. All directors are elected annually by a majority of the votes cast. Detailed information about each director's background and key attributes, experience and skills can be found beginning on page 21 of this Proxy Statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committees | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age | Director Since |
Primary Occupation |
Principal Skills |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Name
|
Independent
|
AC
|
CC
|
ERC
|
Exec
|
IC
|
N&CG
|
|||||||||||||||
Barbara T. Alexander | 66 | 2009 |
Independent Consultant |
Corporate Finance, Investment, Strategic Planning |
Yes | C | · | · | | · | | |||||||||||
Scott Carmilani |
50 |
2003 |
President, CEO and Chairman Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, AG |
Insurance and Reinsurance Industry Leadership |
No |
C |
||||||||||||||||
James F. Duffy |
71 |
2006 |
Former Chairman and CEO The St. Paul Reinsurance Group |
Insurance and Reinsurance Industry Leadership |
Yes |
· |
· |
|
· |
|
· |
|||||||||||
Bart Friedman |
70 |
2006 |
Partner Cahill Gordon Reindel LLP |
Investment, Corporate Governance |
Lead Independent Director |
· |
· |
C |
||||||||||||||
Patrick de Saint-Aignan |
66 |
2008 |
Former Advisory Director Morgan Stanley |
Corporate Finance, Risk Management, Investment |
Yes |
· |
· |
C |
|
· |
|
|||||||||||
Eric S. Schwartz |
52 |
2013 |
CEO and Founder 76 West Holdings |
Corporate Finance, Investment |
Yes |
· |
C |
|||||||||||||||
Samuel J. Weinhoff |
64 |
2006 |
Independent Consultant |
Corporate Finance, Insurance and Reinsurance, Strategic Planning |
Yes |
· |
C |
· |
· |
· |
|
|
||||||
C | Chair | |||||
AC | Audit Committee | Exec | Executive Committee | |||
CC | Compensation Committee | IC | Investment Committee | |||
ERC | Enterprise Risk Committee | N&CG | Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee |
-5-
Executive Compensation Philosophy and Goals
The Compensation Committee believes that an effective executive compensation program is one that is designed to:
![]() |
Reward strong company and individual performance, |
||
![]() |
Align the interests of the executive officers with the company's shareholders, and |
||
![]() |
Balance the objectives of pay-for-performance and retention. |
The Compensation Committee's objectives for the company's compensation programs include:
![]() |
Driving and rewarding employee performance that supports the company's business objectives and financial success; |
||
![]() |
Attracting and retaining talented and highly-skilled employees; |
||
![]() |
Aligning the interests of the named executive officers with the company's shareholders by: |
· |
having a substantial portion of compensation in long-term, performance-based equity awards, a large portion of which is "at risk" with vesting dependent on the company achieving certain performance targets over time, particularly at the senior officer level where such persons can more directly affect the company's financial success; |
||
· |
regularly evaluating the company's compensation programs to help ensure that they do not encourage excessive risk taking; |
||
· |
tying incentive opportunity to a blend of metrics that focus on key company objectives, correlate with the creation of shareholder value and encourage prudent risk taking; and |
![]() |
Remaining competitive with other insurance and reinsurance companies, particularly other insurance and reinsurance companies with which the company competes for talent. |
-6-
PROXY STATEMENT
-7-
-8-
|
Proposal
|
Vote Required
|
Effect of Abstentions |
Effect of "Broker Non-Votes" |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
Amend the Articles of Association to Change the Company's Swiss Registered Office |
2/3 of votes cast |
Vote against |
Vote not counted |
||||
2 |
Amend the Articles of Association to Define the Duties of the Compensation Committee |
Majority of votes cast |
Vote not counted |
Vote not counted |
||||
3 |
Amend the Articles of Association to Define the Company's Compensation Principles |
Majority of votes cast |
Vote not counted |
Vote not counted |
||||
4 |
Amend the Articles of Association to Limit the Notice Period in Employment Agreements with Executive Officers and Agreements with Directors, and to Prohibit Loans and Credit to Executives and Directors |
Majority of votes cast |
Vote not counted |
Vote not counted |
||||
5 |
Amend the Articles of Association to Limit the Number of Outside Board Seats our Directors and Executives May Hold |
Majority of votes cast |
Vote not counted |
Vote not counted |
||||
6 |
Amend the Articles of Association to Provide for Say-on-Pay Votes Required under Swiss Law |
Majority of votes cast |
Vote not counted |
Vote not counted |
||||
7 |
Elect the Board of Directors |
Majority of votes cast |
Vote not counted |
Vote not counted |
||||
8 |
Elect the Chairman of the Board of Directors |
Majority of votes cast |
Vote not counted |
Vote not counted |
||||
9 |
Elect the Compensation Committee Members |
Majority of votes cast |
Vote not counted |
Vote not counted |
||||
10 |
Elect the Independent Proxy |
Majority of votes cast |
Vote not counted |
Vote not counted |
||||
11 |
Approve the 2015 Compensation for Executives as Required under Swiss Law |
Majority of votes cast |
Vote not counted |
Vote not counted |
-9-
|
Proposal
|
Vote Required
|
Effect of Abstentions |
Effect of "Broker Non-Votes" |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12 | Approve the 2015 Compensation for Directors as Required under Swiss Law | Majority of votes cast | Vote not counted | Vote not counted | ||||
13 |
Advisory Vote on 2014 Executive Compensation as Required under U.S. Securities Laws |
Majority of votes cast |
Vote not counted |
Vote not counted |
||||
14 |
Approve the 2014 Annual Report and Financial Statements |
Majority of votes cast |
Vote not counted |
Brokers have discretion to vote |
||||
15 |
Approve the Retention of Disposable Profits |
Majority of votes cast |
Vote not counted |
Brokers have discretion to vote |
||||
16 |
Approve the Payment of Dividends to Shareholders |
Majority of votes cast |
Vote not counted |
Brokers have discretion to vote |
||||
17 |
Approve the Cancelling of Treasury Shares |
Majority of votes cast |
Vote not counted |
Brokers have discretion to vote |
||||
18 |
Elect Deloitte & Touche LLP as Independent Auditor and Deloitte AG as Statutory Auditor |
Majority of votes cast |
Vote not counted |
Brokers have discretion to vote |
||||
19 |
Elect PricewaterhouseCoopers AG as Special Auditor |
Majority of votes cast |
Vote not counted |
Brokers have discretion to vote |
||||
20 |
Discharge of the Board of Directors and Executive Officers from Liabilities |
Majority of votes cast |
Vote not counted |
Vote not counted |
-10-
-11-
-12-
-13-
Organizational Matters Required by Swiss Law
Admission to the Annual Shareholder Meeting
Shareholders who are registered in our share register on the Record Date will receive the Proxy Statement and proxy card from Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, our transfer agent. Beneficial owners of shares will receive instructions from their bank, brokerage firm or other nominee acting as shareholder of record to indicate how they wish their shares to be voted. Beneficial owners who wish to vote in person at the Annual Shareholder Meeting are requested to obtain a power of attorney from their bank, brokerage firm or other nominee that authorizes them to vote the shares held by them on their behalf. In addition, you must bring to the Annual Shareholder Meeting an account statement or letter from your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee indicating that you are the owner of the common shares. Shareholders of record registered in our share register are entitled to participate in and vote at the Annual Shareholder Meeting. Each share is entitled to one vote. The exercise of voting rights is subject to the voting restrictions set out in the company's Articles of Association, a summary of which is contained in " How many votes do I have?" Please see the questions and answers provided under " General Meeting Information" for further information.
Granting a Proxy
If you are a shareholder of record please see " How do I vote?" and " How do I appoint and vote via an independent proxy if I am a shareholder of record?" above in the Proxy Statement for more information on appointing an independent proxy.
Registered shareholders who have appointed the independent proxy as a proxy may not vote in person at the Annual Shareholder Meeting or send a proxy of their choice to the meeting unless they revoke or change their proxies. Revocations to the independent proxy must be received by him by no later than 6:00 a.m., local time, on April 30, 2015 either by mail to Buis Buergi AG, Muehlebachstrasse 8, P.O. Box 672, CH-8024 Zurich, Switzerland or by e-mail at proxy@bblegal.ch.
As indicated on the proxy card, with regard to the items listed on the agenda and without any explicit instructions to the contrary, the independent proxy will vote according to the recommendations of the Board. If new agenda items (other than those on the agenda) or new proposals or motions regarding agenda items set out in the invitation to the Annual Shareholder Meeting are being put forth before the meeting, the independent proxy will vote in accordance with the position of the Board in the absence of other specific instructions.
Beneficial owners who have not obtained a power of attorney from their bank, brokerage firm or other nominee are not entitled to participate in or vote at the Annual Shareholder Meeting.
Admission office
The admission office opens on the day of the Annual Shareholder Meeting at 1:30 p.m. local time. Shareholders of record attending the meeting are kindly asked to present their proxy card as proof of admission at the entrance.
Annual Report of Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, AG
The company's 2014 Annual Report, which accompanies this Proxy Statement, contains the company's audited consolidated financial statements, its audited statutory financial statements prepared in accordance with Swiss law and the remuneration report of the board of directors and executives required under Swiss law. The 2014 Annual Report can be accessed through the company's
-14-
website at www.awac.com under the "Financial Reports" link located in the section entitled "Investor Relations." Copies of the 2014 Annual Report may be obtained without charge upon written request to the Corporate Secretary, attention: Wayne H. Datz, at Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, AG, Park Tower, 15th floor, Gubelstrasse 24, 6300 Zug, Switzerland, or via e-mail at secretary@awac.com. The 2014 Annual Report may be physically inspected at the company's headquarters at Park Tower, 15th floor, Gubelstrasse 24, 6300 Zug, Switzerland.
PROPOSAL 1
AMEND THE ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
TO CHANGE THE COMPANY'S SWISS REGISTERED OFFICE
The company has moved its corporate headquarters from the town of Baar in the Canton of Zug, Switzerland, to the city of Zug in the Canton of Zug, Switzerland. Under Swiss law, and pursuant to paragraph 1(g) of Article 16 of the Articles of Association, the company's shareholders must approve this change to the company's registered office.
The Board is proposing that the shareholders amend Article 1 of the Articles of Association to reflect that the company's registered office is now located in the city of Zug.
Pursuant to Swiss law, we are required to submit to you for your approval both the English version and the (authoritative) German version of the proposed amendments to the company's Articles of Association. Upon the approval of this proposal, Article 1 of the Articles of Association will be amended to read as follows:
"Artikel 1 Firma, Sitz und Dauer der Gesellschaft | "Article 1 Corporate Name, Registered Office and Duration | |
Unter der Firma |
Under the corporate name |
|
Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, Ltd |
Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, Ltd |
|
besteht eine Aktiengesellschaft gemäss Artikel 620 ff. OR mit Sitz in Zug. Die Dauer der Gesellschaft ist unbeschränkt. |
a Company exists pursuant to Article 620 et seq. of the Swiss Code of Obligations (hereinafter "CO") having its registered office in Zug. The duration of the Company is unlimited. |
If the shareholders do not approve this proposal, the Board may call an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders for reconsideration of the proposal.
Your Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the amendment of Article 1 of the Articles of Association as described in this proposal.
PROPOSAL 2
AMEND THE ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
TO DEFINE THE DUTIES OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Pursuant to changes under Swiss law that became effective as of January 1, 2014 (the "Ordinance"), we are required to amend our Articles of Association to define the duties of the Compensation Committee. The company is proposing that the shareholders adopt a new Article 20a in order to comply with these requirements of the Ordinance.
The Compensation Committee members are elected annually, which was previously approved by shareholders at the 2014 Annual Shareholder Meeting. As required by the Ordinance, Article 20a provides: (i) that the Chair of the Compensation Committee be elected by the Board; (ii) that vacancies
-15-
on the Compensation Committee be filled at the Board's discretion, with such appointee to serve until the next annual shareholder meeting; and (iii) the duties of the Compensation Committee, which are set forth in the Compensation Committee's Charter that is approved by the Board of Directors. As noted in "Proposal 7 Election of Directors Board Leadership Structure" below, a copy of the Compensation Committee Charter is available on our website at www.awac.com under "Investor Relations Corporate Information Governance Documents".
Pursuant to Swiss law, we are required to submit to you for your approval both the English version and the (authoritative) German version of the proposed amendment to the Articles of Association. The foregoing summary of the proposed changes to the company's current Articles of Association is qualified in its entirety by express reference to the text of Article 20a of the Articles of Association, a copy of which has been marked to indicate changes from the company's current Articles of Association and is attached as Appendix B to this Proxy Statement.
If the shareholders do not approve this proposal, the Board may call an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders for reconsideration of the proposal.
Your Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the adoption of Article 20a of the Articles of Association as described in this proposal and set forth in Appendix B.
PROPOSAL 3
AMEND THE ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
TO DEFINE THE COMPANY'S COMPENSATION PRINCIPLES
Pursuant to the Ordinance, we are required to amend our Articles of Association to define the principles of compensation, including performance-based compensation and equity grants. The company is proposing that shareholders adopt a new Article 20b to the company's Articles of Association to comply with Swiss law and define such principles.
The company's principles of compensation, as recommended by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board, are discussed in detail in "Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis" beginning on page 50 of this Proxy Statement (the "CD&A"). Proposed Article 20b (i) specifies the components of compensation that may be paid to directors and executives officers; and (ii) provides for the payment of retirement, health and welfare benefits, all consistent with the company's current pay practices as discussed in this Proxy Statement. Article 20b also permits the company to purchase director and officer liability insurance and other liability insurance and that the payment of the premium for such insurance shall not be deemed compensation to the directors and executive officers. The company believes that such liability insurance coverage is an important element of its overall risk management program and that this coverage is provided by the company's competitors. Proposed Article 20b also specifies that any additional shares received by the directors or executive officers as shareholders of the company shall not be deemed compensation.
Pursuant to the Ordinance, the Board is also required to annually issue a compensation report detailing the compensation of the company's directors and executives. The Ordinance states that this obligation of the Board may not be delegated. The company is proposing an amendment to Article 19(6) to reflect this requirement. The Ordinance further requires that the Board may delegate the management of the company's business only to the directors or to one or more natural persons, as opposed to corporations and other legal entities. Accordingly, the company is proposing a clarifying amendment to Article 18(b) to allow delegation only to natural persons.
-16-
Pursuant to Swiss law, we are required to submit to you for your approval both the English version and the (authoritative) German version of the proposed amendment to the Articles of Association. The foregoing summary of the proposed changes to the company's current Articles of Association is qualified in its entirety by express reference to the texts of Article 20b, Article 18(b), and Article 19(6) of the Articles of Association, a copy of which has been marked to indicate changes from the company's current Articles of Association and is attached as Appendix B to this Proxy Statement.
If the shareholders do not approve this proposal, the Board may call an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders for reconsideration of the proposal.
Your Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the adoption of Article 20b of the Articles of Association and FOR the related amendments to Articles 18(b) and Article 19(6) as described in this proposal and set forth in Appendix B.
PROPOSAL 4
AMEND THE ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION TO LIMIT THE NOTICE PERIOD IN
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS WITH EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND AGREEMENTS
WITH DIRECTORS, AND TO PROHIBIT LOANS AND
CREDIT TO EXECUTIVES AND
DIRECTORS
Pursuant to the Ordinance, we are required to amend our Articles of Association to limit the "notice period" (as discussed below) in any compensation-related agreements we enter into with our directors and executive officers. We are also required to prohibit any loans or credit to our directors and executive officers. The company is proposing that shareholders adopt a new Article 20c to the Articles of Association to comply with the Ordinance.
Limitation on Notice Period
The "notice period" is the period of time after the company or the respective director or executive has given notice of termination of his or her agreement and before the effective time of termination of his or her employment with the company. During the notice period, the company is required to continue to pay a director's or executive's salary, health and welfare benefits and other compensation and the respective director or executive generally has to continue to fulfill his or her duties towards the company. With respect to service agreements with directors or employment agreements with executives, it is common in Europe that the notice period is transferred into a "garden leave", which means that the company releases the director or executive from his or her duties but continues to pay compensation for the remaining notice period. The Ordinance provides that the notice period of the service agreements with directors and employment agreements with executives that form the basis for their compensation may not exceed 12 months. The Board is proposing that the company's Articles of Association limit the notice period of any compensation-related agreements with directors and any employment agreements with executive officers to 12 months.
Proposed Article 20c a) states that the company may enter into service agreements with directors and employment agreements with executives for a fixed term or for an indefinite term so long as the notice period under such agreements does not exceed 12 months. The company does not currently, and in the future does not plan to, enter into service agreements with its directors. If the shareholders approve this Proposal 4, employment agreements with the company's key executives will be amended accordingly before December 31, 2015.
-17-
Limit on Loans and Credit to Directors and Executives
The company does not currently, and in the future does not plan to, extend loans or credit to its directors or executives. The Board is proposing that the company's Articles of Association specify that the company does not engage in such practice. Accordingly, proposed Article 20c b) states that as a rule, the company does not grant any loans or credit to directors or officers.
Pursuant to Swiss law, we are required to submit to you for your approval both the English version and the (authoritative) German version of the proposed amendment to the Articles of Association. The foregoing summary of the proposed changes to the company's current Articles of Association is qualified in its entirety by express reference to the text of Article 20c of the Articles of Association, a copy of which has been marked to indicate changes from the company's current Articles of Association and is attached as Appendix B to this Proxy Statement.
If the shareholders do not approve this proposal, the Board may call an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders for reconsideration of the proposal.
Your Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the adoption of Article 20c of the Articles of Association as described in this proposal and set forth in Appendix B.
PROPOSAL 5
AMEND THE ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
TO LIMIT THE NUMBER OF OUTSIDE BOARD SEATS
OUR DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVES MAY HOLD
Pursuant to the Ordinance, we are required to amend our Articles of Association to limit the number of outside board seats that directors and executive officers can hold. While our Articles of Association currently do not provide for a limit to the number of outside board seats that our directors can maintain, the Board expects each director and executive officer to ensure that any commitment they make to other organizations will not interfere with their ability to devote sufficient time and attention to company matters. In addition, it is the policy of the Board that each director not serve on more than three additional public company boards of directors and that a director notify the Chairman of the Board prior to accepting any invitation to serve on another public company board in order to ensure that conflicts of interest, antitrust issues or a failure to maintain independence does not arise. It is the policy of the company that all executive officers obtain written approval before serving as a director of a for-profit corporation.
The Board is proposing that the shareholders adopt a new Article 20d to the company's Articles of Association that would limit the number of outside director seats that directors can hold to ten, of which not more than three may be with an additional public company, and the number of outside director seats that executives can hold to five, of which not more than one may be with an additional public company. Any outside board seat that is held by a director or an executive officer with any subsidiary or affiliate of the company shall not count against these limits. Outside board seats that are held by a director or executive officer at the request of the company or with a non-profit organization shall each be limited to no more than ten such directorships.
Pursuant to Swiss law, we are required to submit to you for your approval both the English version and the (authoritative) German version of the proposed amendment to the Articles of Association. The foregoing summary of the proposed changes to the company's current Articles of Association is qualified in its entirety by express reference to the texts of Article 20d of the Articles of
-18-
Association, a copy of which has been marked to indicate changes from the company's current Articles of Association and is attached as Appendix B to this Proxy Statement.
If the shareholders do not approve this proposal, the Board may call an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders for reconsideration of the proposal.
Your Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the adoption of Article 20d of the Articles of Association as described in this proposal and set forth in Appendix B.
PROPOSAL 6
AMEND THE ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
TO PROVIDE FOR SAY-ON-PAY VOTES REQUIRED UNDER SWISS LAW
The Ordinance requires the company to hold binding shareholder say-on-pay votes for director and executive compensation. The Ordinance also requires amendments to our Articles of Association to define the details regarding these binding say-on-pay votes. The Ordinance mandates that shareholders vote separately on the aggregate compensation of directors as a group and on the aggregate compensation of executives as a group. Under the Ordinance, organizations may conduct these binding say-on-pay votes either prospectively or retrospectively. That is, companies may choose whether shareholders vote to approve the actual compensation that has already been paid by the company or whether shareholders approve a compensation budget that is proposed to be paid by the company for a specified period. If the company conducts prospective say-on-pay votes, it must specify the fiscal year, calendar year or other period of the time for which shareholders are being asked to approve the compensation budget (the "Approval Period").
In accordance with SEC requirements, each year since 2011, the company has provided shareholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on executive compensation retrospectively. Each year, these advisory votes have received overwhelming shareholder approval with over 98% of the votes cast in favor of the company's say-on-pay proposal. The Board therefore proposes that the company's Articles of Association provide that the binding say-on-pay votes required by the Ordinance be conducted prospectively in order to alleviate any uncertainty that may occur if the shareholders did not approve the binding say-on-pay votes required by the Ordinance, but did approve the advisory say-on-pay vote conducted pursuant to SEC requirements, or vice versa. The Board is proposing that the Approval Period applicable to each say-on-pay vote be the current calendar year. Accordingly, the Approval Period for the say-on-pay votes that will be conducted at this Annual Shareholder Meeting, as described in Proposals 11 and 12 in this Proxy Statement, will be the 2015 calendar year.
The Ordinance also provides that, if a company elects to conduct prospective binding say-on-pay votes, the Articles of Association may provide for a specified additional amount to be available for the compensation of executives who are appointed after shareholder approval of the say-on-pay votes. This additional amount may be paid to such executives without any further shareholder action, but only if the aggregate amount approved by the shareholders for executives is insufficient to compensate the newly appointed executive(s). The Board is proposing that the Articles of Association include a provision that an additional amount of up to 40% of the previously approved total aggregate compensation of executives be available for the compensation of each new executive appointed after the say-on-pay vote for 2015.
The Ordinance also requires that the Articles of Association provide details regarding how to proceed if shareholders do not approve the say-on-pay votes required by the Ordinance. The Board proposes that the Articles of Association provide that in such event, the Board may call an extraordinary meeting of shareholders in order to submit a new proposal for shareholder approval.
-19-
The Board is proposing that the shareholders adopt a new Article 20e to the company's Articles of Association that would define the details regarding the binding say-on-pay votes. The proposed Article 20e would also clarify that: (i) amounts paid to directors and executives as reimbursement of business expenses incurred in connection with their service to the company will not constitute compensation subject to shareholder approval; (ii) directors and executives may receive compensation for services rendered to the company's subsidiaries, which may be paid by the company or its subsidiaries, if such amounts are included in the total aggregate amount of compensation approved by shareholders; and (iii) compensation approved by the shareholders may be paid in whole or in part after the Approval Period for which it was approved if it is paid for the performance of services during the Approval Period for which it was approved. In addition, the Board is proposing to adopt a new Article 9(5) to state specifically that shareholders must approve the compensation amount for the directors and the executive officers. The Board is also proposing that Article 17 of the Articles of Association be amended to delete paragraph c) since the Ordinance requires that the compensation of directors be subject to shareholder approval rather than determined by the Board.
Pursuant to Swiss law, we are required to submit to you for your approval both the English version and the (authoritative) German version of the proposed amendment to the Articles of Association. The foregoing summary of the proposed changes to the company's current Articles of Association is qualified in its entirety by express reference to the texts of Article 9(5) and Article 20e of the Articles of Association, a copy of which has been marked to indicate changes from the company's current Articles of Association and is attached as Appendix B to this Proxy Statement.
If the shareholders do not approve this proposal, the Board may call an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders for reconsideration of the proposal.
Your Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the adoption of Article 9(5) and Article 20e and the deletion of paragraph c) of Article 17 of the Articles of Association as described in this proposal and set forth in Appendix B.
PROPOSAL 7
ELECT THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Each member of our Board is being nominated for election at this Annual Shareholder Meeting. Each of the nominees is a current member of the Board and was recommended for appointment to the Board by the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee to serve until the Annual Shareholder Meeting in 2016.
Your Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR each of the nominees as listed on the enclosed proxy card. It is not expected that any of the nominees will become unavailable for election as a director but, if any nominee should become unavailable prior to the meeting, proxies will be voted in accordance with the general instructions provided on the proxy card with regard to such other person as your Board shall recommend and nominate. In the absence of other specific instructions, proxies will be voted as your Board shall recommend.
The biography of each nominee below contains information regarding the person's service as a director on the Board, his or her business experience, director positions at other companies held currently or at any time during the last five years, and their applicable experiences, qualifications, attributes and skills. Mr. Scott Hunter, a current director, is retiring from the Board and is not a nominee for reelection.
-20-
Nominees for Election
| | | | |
Barbara T. Alexander, 66 | ||||
| | | | |
Position, Principal Occupation and Business Experience: Ms. Alexander has been an independent consultant since January 2004. Prior to that, she was a Senior Advisor to UBS Warburg LLC and predecessor firms from October 1999 to January 2004, and Managing Director of the North American Construction and Furnishings Group in the Corporate Finance Department of UBS from 1992 to October 1999. From 1987 to 1992, Ms. Alexander was a Managing Director in the Corporate Finance Department of Salomon Brothers Inc. From 1972 to 1987, she held various positions at Salomon Brothers, Smith Barney, Investors Diversified Services, and Wachovia Bank and Trust Company. Ms. Alexander is currently a member of the board of directors of QUALCOMM Incorporated, where she is a member of the Compensation Committee; and Choice Hotels International, Inc., where she is Chairperson of the Audit Committee and a member of the Diversity Committee. Ms. Alexander previously served on the board of directors of KB Home from October 2010 to April 2014, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) from November 2004 to March 2010, Centex Corporation from July 1999 to August 2009, Burlington Resources Inc. from January 2004 to March 2006 and Harrah's Entertainment Inc. from February 2002 to April 2007. Ms. Alexander was selected as one of seven Outstanding Directors in Corporate America in 2003 by Board Alert magazine and was one of five Director of the Year honorees in 2008 by the Forum for Corporate Directors. She has also served on the board of directors of HomeAid America, Habitat for Humanity International and Covenant House. Key Attributes, Experience and Skills: Having been a member of numerous public company boards of directors, Ms. Alexander is familiar with a full range of corporate and board functions. She also has extensive experience in corporate finance, investment and strategic planning matters. The Board believes that, among other qualifications, Ms. Alexander's extensive experience in corporate finance, investment and strategic planning matters give her the skills to serve as a director. |
Director Since: August 2009 Board Committees: Audit (Chair), Compensation, Enterprise Risk and Investment Other Current Public Boards: QUALCOMM Incorporated (NASDAQ: QCOM) and Choice Hotels International (NYSE: CHH) |
-21-
| | | | |
Scott A. Carmilani, 50 | ||||
| | | | |
Position, Principal Occupation and Business Experience: Mr. Carmilani was elected our President and Chief Executive Officer in January 2004 and was appointed Chairman of the Board in January 2008. Mr. Carmilani was, prior to joining our company as Executive Vice President in February 2002, the President of the Mergers & Acquisition Insurance Division of subsidiaries of American International Group, Inc. ("AIG") and responsible for the management, marketing and underwriting of transactional insurance products for clients engaged in mergers, acquisitions or divestitures. Mr. Carmilani was previously the Regional Vice-President overseeing the New York general insurance operations of AIG. Before that he was the Divisional President of the Middle Market Division of National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., which underwrites directors and officers liability, employment practice liability and fidelity insurance for middle-market-sized companies. Prior to joining our company, he held a succession of underwriting and management positions with subsidiaries of AIG since 1987. Mr. Carmilani is currently a member of the board of trustees of the Visiting Nurse Association (VNA) Health Group, Inc. of New Jersey. Key Attributes, Experience and Skills: The Board believes that, among other qualifications, Mr. Carmilani's extensive expertise and experience in the insurance and reinsurance industry give him the skills to serve as a director. |
Director Since: September 2003 Board Committees: Executive (Chair) Other Current Public Boards: None |
|||
| | | | |
James F. Duffy, 71 | ||||
| | | | |
Position, Principal Occupation and Business Experience: Mr. Duffy retired in 2002 as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The St. Paul Reinsurance Group, where he originally served from 1993 until 2000 as President and Chief Operating Officer of global reinsurance operations. Prior to this, Mr. Duffy served as an executive vice president of The St. Paul Companies from 1984 to 1993, and as President and Chief Operating Officer of St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company from 1980 until 1984. Mr. Duffy had 15 years prior experience in insurance underwriting with Employers Surplus Lines Insurance Company, First State Insurance Company and New England Re. Key Attributes, Experience and Skills: The Board believes that, among other qualifications, Mr. Duffy's extensive expertise and experience in the insurance and reinsurance industry give him the skills to serve as a director. |
Director Since: July 2006 Board Committees: Audit, Compensation, Executive and Nominating & Corporate Governance Other Current Public Boards: None |
-22-
| | | | |
Bart Friedman, 70 | ||||
| | | | |
Position, Principal Occupation and Business Experience: Mr. Friedman was elected Vice Chairman of the Board in July 2006 and was appointed Lead Independent Director of the Board in January 2008. Mr. Friedman has been a partner at Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, a New York law firm, since 1980. Mr. Friedman specializes in corporate governance, special committees and director representation. Mr. Friedman worked early in his career at the SEC. Mr. Friedman is currently chairman of the board of directors of Sanford Bernstein Mutual Funds, where he is a member of the Audit Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee. He is also the chairman of the Audit Committee of The Brookings Institution and is a member of the board of directors of the Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts, where he is chairman of the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee. Key Attributes, Experience and Skills: The Board believes that, among other qualifications, Mr. Friedman's extensive expertise and experience in corporate governance and investment matters give him the skills to serve as a director. |
Director Since: March 2006 Lead Independent Director Board Committees: Compensation, Investment and Nominating & Corporate Governance (Chair) Other Current Public Boards: Sanford Bernstein Mutual Funds |
|||
| | | | |
Patrick de Saint-Aignan, 66 | ||||
| | | | |
Position, Principal Occupation and Business Experience: Mr. de Saint-Aignan held multiple positions at Morgan Stanley internationally from 1974 to 2007, where he was a Managing Director and, most recently, an Advisory Director. He held responsibilities in corporate finance and capital markets and headed successively Morgan Stanley's global fixed income derivatives and debt capital markets activities, its office in Paris, France, and the firm-wide risk management function. He was also a Founder, Director and Chairman of the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (1985-1992); Censeur on the Supervisory Board of IXIS Corporate and Investment Bank (2005-2007); a member of the board of directors of Bank of China Limited (2006-2008), where he was Chairman of the Audit Committee and a member of the Risk Policy Committee and the Personnel and Remuneration Committee; and a member of the board of directors and non-executive Chairman of the European Kyoto Fund (2010 2011). Mr. de Saint-Aignan is currently a member of the board of directors of State Street Corporation, where he is a member of its Risk and Capital Committee and its Examining and Audit Committee. Key Attributes, Experience and Skills: The Board believes that, among other qualifications, Mr. de Saint-Aignan's broad experience and expertise in corporate finance, risk management and investment matters as well as his international business background give him the skills to serve as a director. |
Director Since: August 2008 Board Committees: Audit, Compensation, Enterprise Risk (Chair) and Investment Other Current Public Boards: State Street Corporation (NYSE: STT) |
-23-
| | | | |
Eric S. Schwartz, 52 | ||||
| | | | |
Position, Principal Occupation and Business Experience: Mr. Schwartz is the founder and has been Chief Executive Officer of 76 West Holdings, a private investment company, since June 2008. In support of the activities of 76 West, he has served as Chairman of Applied Data Finance, LLC, a non-prime consumer finance company since November 2014; as a director of Demica Limited, a trade finance company since July 2014; as Chairman of Jefferson National Financial Corp., an insurance company focused on the variable annuity market, since January 2012; as Chairman of Gold Bullion International LLC, a precious metals dealer, since January 2012; as a director of Indostar Capital Finance, a finance company based in India, since April 2011; and as a director of Binary Event Network, an electronic prediction marketplace, since May 2011. He has served as a director of Atlanta Hawks Basketball & Entertainment, LLC since March 2014. He also served as Chairman-elect of Nikko Asset Management from June 2008 until its sale in June 2009; and as a director of Prosper Marketplace, an internet-based consumer lending company, from March 2012 until January 2013. Mr. Schwartz is a former Co-CEO of Goldman Sachs Asset Management. He joined The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. ("Goldman Sachs") in 1984 and served in various leadership positions at the firm during his tenure at Goldman Sachs. In 1994, he became a partner in the Equity Capital Markets unit of Goldman Sachs' Investment Banking Division and later served as Co-Head of its Global Equities and Investment Management Divisions. He joined Goldman Sachs' Management Committee in 2001 and was named Co-Head of its Partnership Committee in 2005. In June 2007, he retired from Goldman Sachs. He serves as a director of the Food Bank for New York City and as a director of Securing America's Future Energy. Key Attributes, Experience and Skills: The Board believes that, among other qualifications, Mr. Schwartz's broad experience and expertise in corporate finance and investment matters as well as his international business background give him the skills to serve as a director. |
Director Since: October 2013 Board Committees: Compensation and Investment (Chair) Other Current Public Boards: None |
-24-
| | | | |
Samuel J. Weinhoff, 64 | ||||
| | | | |
Position, Principal Occupation and Business Experience: Mr. Weinhoff has served as a consultant to the insurance industry since 2000. Prior to this, Mr. Weinhoff was head of the Financial Institutions Group for Schroder & Co. from 1997 until 2000. He was also a Managing Director at Lehman Brothers, where he worked from 1985 to 1997. Mr. Weinhoff had ten years prior experience at the Home Insurance Company and the Reliance Insurance Company in a variety of positions, including excess casualty reinsurance treaty underwriter, investment department analyst, and head of corporate planning and reporting. Mr. Weinhoff is currently a member of the board of directors of Infinity Property and Casualty Corporation where he is a member of the Executive Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee and Chairman of the Audit Committee. Mr. Weinhoff served on the board of directors of Inter-Atlantic Financial, Inc. from July 2007 to October 2009. Key Attributes, Experience and Skills: The Board believes that, among other qualifications, Mr. Weinhoff's extensive insurance and reinsurance industry experience as well as expertise in corporate finance and strategic planning matters give him the skills to serve as a director. |
Director Since: July 2006 Board Committees: Audit, Compensation (Chair), Enterprise Risk, Executive and Investment Other Current Public Boards: Infinity Property and Casualty Corporation (NASDAQ: IPCC) |
Board and Committee Membership(1)
Name
|
Audit
|
Compensation
|
Enterprise Risk
|
Executive
|
Investment
|
Nominating
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Barbara T. Alexander* |
C |
· |
· |
|
· |
|
||||||
Scott A. Carmilani |
C |
|||||||||||
James F. Duffy* |
· |
· |
|
· |
|
· |
||||||
Bart Friedman** |
· |
C |
C |
|||||||||
Patrick de Saint-Aignan* |
· |
· |
C |
|
· |
|
||||||
Eric S. Schwartz* |
· |
C |
||||||||||
Samuel J. Weinhoff* |
· |
C |
· |
· |
· |
|
||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Number of 2014 Meetings |
6 |
4 |
5 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
· Member |
C Chair |
* Independent Director |
** Lead Independent Director |
Director Independence
The Board has determined that Ms. Alexander and Messrs. Duffy, Friedman, Hunter, de Saint-Aignan, Schwartz and Weinhoff are independent directors under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE"). We require that a majority of our directors meet the criteria for independence under applicable law and the rules of the NYSE. The Board has adopted a policy to assist it and the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee in their determination as to whether a nominee or director qualifies as independent. This policy contains categorical standards for determining independence and includes the independence standards required by the SEC and the NYSE, as well as standards published by institutional investor groups and other corporate governance experts. In making its determination of independence, the Board applied these standards for director independence and determined that no material relationship existed between the company and these directors. A copy of the Board Policy on Director Independence is attached as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement.
-25-
Meetings and Committees of the Board
During the year ended December 31, 2014, there were six meetings of our Board (including regularly scheduled and special meetings), six meetings of the Audit Committee, four meetings of the Compensation Committee, five meetings of the Enterprise Risk Committee, no meeting of the Executive Committee, four meetings of the Investment Committee and three meetings of the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee. Each of our directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of Board meetings and committee meetings of which he or she was a member during the period he or she served on the Board. Our non-management directors meet separately from the other directors in an executive session at least quarterly. Mr. Friedman, our Vice Chairman of the Board and Lead Independent Director, or his designee, served as the presiding director of the executive sessions of our non-management and independent directors held in 2014. The Lead Independent Director also has the authority to call meetings of the independent directors or full Board.
Board Leadership Structure
The Board has chosen a leadership structure that combines the role of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chairman of the Board while also having a Lead Independent Director. The Lead Independent Director assumes many of the responsibilities typically held by a non-executive chairman of the board and a list of his responsibilities is provided in the chart below. The company's rationale for combining the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board positions relates principally to the Board's belief that at this stage of our development and continued global expansion, the company and its shareholders will be best served if the Chairman is in close proximity to the senior management team on a regular and continual basis.
| | | | | |
Lead Independent Director | |||||
The Lead Independent Director is elected solely by and from the independent directors. Responsibilities include: | |||||
|
· organizing and presiding over all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman of the Board is not present, including all executive sessions of the non-management and independent directors; |
|
|||
|
· serving as the liaison between the Chairman of the Board and the non-management directors; |
|
|||
|
· overseeing the information sent to the Board by management; |
|
|||
|
· approving meeting agendas and schedules for the Board to assure that there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items; |
|
|||
|
· facilitating communication between the Board and management; |
|
|||
|
· being available to communicate with and respond to certain inquiries of the company's shareholders; and |
|
|||
|
· performing such other duties as requested by the Board. |
|
|||
| | | | |
Our Board has also approved Corporate Governance Guidelines, a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and a Code of Ethics for Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers. Printed copies of these documents as well as the committee charters discussed below are available by sending a written request to our Corporate Secretary. The foregoing information is available on our website at www.awac.com under "Investor Relations Corporate Information Governance Documents".
-26-
Audit Committee. Pursuant to its charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing our independent auditors, internal auditors, compliance with legal and regulatory standards and the integrity of our financial reporting. Each member of the Audit Committee has been determined by the Board to be "financially literate" within the meaning of the NYSE Listing Standards and each has been designated by the Board as an "audit committee financial expert," as defined by the applicable rules of the SEC, based on either their extensive prior accounting and auditing experience or having a range of experience in varying executive positions in the insurance or financial services industry.
Compensation Committee. Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee has the authority to establish compensation policies and recommend compensation programs to the Board, including administering all equity and incentive compensation plans of the company. Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee also has the authority to review the competitiveness of the non-management directors' compensation programs and recommend to the Board these compensation programs and all payouts made thereunder. Additional information on the Compensation Committee's consideration of executive compensation, including a discussion of the roles of the company's Chief Executive Officer and the independent compensation consultant in such executive compensation consideration, is included in "Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis."
Enterprise Risk Committee. Pursuant to its charter, the Enterprise Risk Committee oversees management's assessment and mitigation of the company's enterprise risks and reviews and recommends to the Board for approval the company's overall firm-wide risk appetite statement and oversees management's compliance therewith.
Executive Committee. The Executive Committee has the authority to oversee the general business and affairs of the company to the extent permitted by Swiss law.
Investment Committee. Pursuant to its charter, the Investment Committee is responsible for adopting and overseeing compliance with the company's Investment Policy Statement, which contains investment guidelines and other parameters for the investment portfolio. The Investment Committee oversees the company's overall investment strategy and the company's investment risk exposures.
Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee. Pursuant to its charter, the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying individuals believed to be qualified to become directors and to recommend such individuals to the Board and to oversee corporate governance matters and practices.
The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee will consider nominees recommended by shareholders and will evaluate such nominees on the same basis as all other nominees. Shareholders who wish to submit nominees for director for consideration by the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee for election at the Annual Shareholder Meeting in 2016 may do so by submitting in writing such nominees' names and other information required under SEC rules and our Articles of Association, in compliance with the procedures described under "Shareholder Proposals for 2016 Annual Shareholder Meeting" in this Proxy Statement.
The criteria adopted by the Board for use in evaluating the suitability of all nominees for director include the following:
· |
high personal and professional ethics, values and integrity; |
||
· |
education, skill and experience with insurance, reinsurance or other businesses and organizations that the Board deems relevant and useful, including whether such attributes or background would contribute to the diversity of the Board; |
-27-
· |
ability and willingness to serve on any committees of the Board; and |
||
· |
ability and willingness to commit adequate time to the proper functioning of the Board and its committees. |
In addition to considering candidates suggested by shareholders, the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee considers candidates recommended by current directors, officers and others. The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee screens all director candidates. The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee determines whether or not the candidate meets the company's general qualifications and specific qualities for directors and whether or not additional information is appropriate.
The Board and the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee do not have a specific policy regarding diversity. Instead, in addition to the general qualities that the Board requires of all nominees and directors, such as high personal and professional ethics, values and integrity, the Board and the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee strive to have a diverse group of directors with differing experiences, qualifications, attributes and skills to further enhance the quality of the Board. As we are an insurance and reinsurance company that (i) sells products that protect other companies and individuals from complex risks, (ii) has a significant investment portfolio and (iii) faces operational risks similar to those at other international companies, the Board and the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee believe that having a group of directors who have the range of experience and skills to understand and oversee this type of business is critical. The Board and the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee do not believe that each director must be an expert in every aspect of our business, but instead the Board and committee strive to have well-rounded, collegial directors who contribute to the diversity of ideas and strengthen the Board's capabilities as a whole. Through their professional careers and experiences, the Board and the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee believe that each director has obtained certain attributes that further the goals discussed above.
Risk Oversight
While the assumption of risk is inherent to our business, we believe we have developed a strong risk management culture throughout our organization that is fostered and maintained by our senior management, with oversight by the Board through its committees. The Board primarily delegates its risk management oversight to three of its committees: the Audit Committee, the Enterprise Risk Committee and the Investment Committee, who regularly report to the Board. The Audit Committee primarily oversees those risks that may directly or indirectly impact the company's financial statements, the Enterprise Risk Committee primarily oversees the company's business and operational risks and the Investment Committee primarily oversees the company's investment portfolio risks. The Enterprise Risk Committee also reviews and recommends for approval by the Board our overall firm-wide risk appetite statement, and oversees management's compliance with this statement. Each committee has broad powers to ensure that it has the resources to satisfy its duties under its charter, including the ability to request reports from any officer or employee of the company and the authority to retain special counsel or other experts and consultants as it deems appropriate.
Each of these committees receives regular reports from senior management who have day-to-day risk management responsibilities, including from our Chief Executive Officer. The Audit Committee receives reports from our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Actuary, General Counsel, Chief Information Officer, Head of Internal Audit and the company's independent auditors. These reports address various aspects of risk assessment and management relating to the company's financial statements. The Enterprise Risk Committee meets regularly with our Chief Executive Officer; President, Underwriting and Global Risk; Chief Risk Officer; and Chief Actuary as part
-28-
of its oversight of the company's underwriting, pricing and claims risks. Throughout the year, the Enterprise Risk Committee will also receive reports from other operational areas. To assist it in its oversight of the company's investment risk exposures, the Investment Committee receives reports from our Chief Investment Officer and external investment managers and advisors.
As open communications and equal access to information can be an important part of the Board's risk oversight, all of the directors receive the information sent to each committee prior to any committee meeting. Board members are also encouraged to, and often do, attend all committee meetings regardless of whether he or she is a member of such committee.
Director Compensation
In 2014, compensation for our non-management directors consisted of the following:
Fees for Non-Management Directors
Position
|
Annual Cash Retainers
|
Annual Value of RSU Award |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Board Member |
$ 85,000(1) |
$ |
90,000 |
(1) |
||
Lead Independent Director |
$ 15,000 |
|
||||
Audit Committee and Enterprise Risk Committee Chair |
$ 50,000(1) |
|
|
|||
Compensation Committee and Investment Committee Chair |
$ 35,000 |
|
||||
Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee Chair |
$ 8,000 |
|
|
|||
Audit Committee Members |
$ 25,000 |
|
Our non-management directors received $3,000 for each Board meeting attended and $2,000 for each committee meeting attended. We also provide to all non-management directors reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection with their service on the Board, including the reimbursement of director educational expenses.
As discussed in footnote 2 to the "Stock Awards" column of the "Non-Management Directors Compensation" table below, in February 2014, each non-management director received an annual equity award of RSUs of the company worth approximately $75,000. Each RSU represents the right to receive one newly-issued, fully paid and non-assessable common share of the company at a future date and fully vests on the first anniversary of the date of grant, subject to continued service as a director through such date. The RSUs were awarded to our non-management directors pursuant to the Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, AG 2012 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (the "2012 Omnibus Plan") and, other than with respect to vesting terms, were granted on similar terms and conditions as those generally granted to our employees. In 2014, these annual equity awards were granted concurrently with the grant of equity awards to members of our senior management following the preparation and completion of the 2014 year-end financial statements. Consistent with past practice, on February 17, 2015, each of our non-management directors (other than Mr. Hunter) received 2,311 RSUs under the 2012 Omnibus Plan.
-29-
The following table provides information concerning the compensation paid to the company's non-management directors for fiscal year 2014.
Non-Management Directors Compensation(1)
Name
|
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash |
Stock Awards(2) |
Other Compensation(3) |
Total | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Barbara T. Alexander |
$ 189,750 |
$ |
74,503 |
$ |
10,000 |
$ |
274,253 |
|||||
James F. Duffy |
$ 152,750 |
$ |
74,503 |
$ |
|
$ |
227,253 |
|||||
Bart Friedman |
$ 174,750 |
$ |
74,503 |
$ |
|
$ |
249,253 |
|||||
Scott Hunter |
$ 229,097 |
$ |
74,503 |
$ |
|
$ |
303,600 |
|||||
Patrick de Saint-Aignan |
$ 214,750 |
$ |
74,503 |
$ |
10,000 |
$ |
299,253 |
|||||
Eric S. Schwartz |
$ 152,750 |
$ |
74,503 |
$ |
|
$ |
227,253 |
|||||
Samuel J. Weinhoff |
$ 199,750 |
$ |
74,503 |
$ |
10,000 |
$ |
284,253 |
Stock Ownership Policy
In order to promote equity ownership and further align the interests of the Board with our shareholders, the Board adopted a stock ownership policy for all non-management directors. Under this policy, non-management directors are expected to own, within five years after his or her joining the Board, equity interests of the company with a value equal to five times the then-current annual cash retainer for serving on the Board. Non-management directors are expected not to sell any common shares until they are in compliance with this policy. Mr. Carmilani, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, is subject to a stock ownership policy for senior employees as described in "Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis Stock Ownership Policy."
-30-
PROPOSAL 8
ELECT THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Pursuant to Swiss law, the Chairman of the Board must be elected annually by our shareholders. The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee has recommended electing Scott A. Carmilani to serve as Chairman of the Board until the Annual Shareholder Meeting in 2016. Mr. Carmilani has served as Chairman of the Board since January 2008. As noted in "Board Leadership Structure," our rationale for combining the CEO and Chairman of the Board positions relates principally to the Board's belief that at this stage of our development and continued global expansion, we and our shareholders will be best served if the Chairman is in close proximity to the senior management team on a regular and continual basis. Under Mr. Carmilani's leadership as President, CEO and Chairman of the Board, we have achieved considerable growth by expanding our business in Asia, Europe, Latin America and North America; have successfully responded to changes to the insurance and reinsurance industry as well as macroeconomic change; and have delivered superior value creation over the past several years. For additional information about our financial performance and our performance relative to our peers, please see the "Proxy Statement Summary" on page 1 of this Proxy Statement.
This agenda item may only be approved if our shareholders voting (in person or by proxy) at the Annual Shareholder Meeting first elect Mr. Carmilani as a director in Proposal 7 "Elect the Board of Directors". If our shareholders do not approve this proposal, the Board may call an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders for reconsideration of this proposal.
Your Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the nominee for Chairman of the Board, Mr. Scott A. Carmilani, as listed on the enclosed proxy card. It is not expected that the nominee will become unavailable for election as Chairman of the Board but, if Mr. Carmilani should become unavailable prior to the meeting, proxies will be voted in accordance with the general instructions provided on the proxy card with regard to such other person as your Board shall recommend and nominate. In the absence of other specific instructions, proxies will be voted as your Board shall recommend.
PROPOSAL 9
ELECT THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Pursuant to Swiss law, the Compensation Committee members must be elected annually by our shareholders. The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee has recommended electing Ms. Alexander and Messrs. Duffy, Friedman, de Saint-Aignan, Schwartz and Weinhoff to serve as members of the Compensation Committee until the Annual Shareholder Meeting in 2016. As noted in "Nominees for Election Board and Committee Membership," the Compensation Committee is comprised entirely of independent directors. As noted in "Board Leadership Structure," the Compensation Committee has the authority to establish compensation policies and recommend compensation programs to the Board. Each of the members of the Compensation Committee proposed for election currently serves on the committee.
This agenda item may only be approved if our shareholders voting (in person or by proxy) at the Annual Shareholder Meeting elect each of the directors that are members of the Compensation Committee in Proposal 7 "Elect the Board of Directors". If a director is not re-elected as a director in Proposal 7, he or she will be ineligible to serve on the Compensation Committee. If our shareholders do not approve this proposal, the Board may call an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders for reconsideration of this proposal.
-31-
Your Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR each of the nominees of the Compensation Committee, Ms. Alexander and Messrs. Duffy, Friedman, de Saint-Aignan, Schwartz and Weinhoff, as listed on the enclosed proxy card. It is not expected that any nominee will become unavailable for election as a member of the Compensation Committee but, if any nominee should become unavailable prior to the meeting, proxies will be voted in accordance with the general instructions provided on the proxy card with regard to such other person as your Board shall recommend and nominate. In the absence of other specific instructions, proxies will be voted as your Board shall recommend.
PROPOSAL 10
ELECT THE INDEPENDENT PROXY
Pursuant to Swiss law, the independent proxy must be elected annually by our shareholders. The Board has recommended electing Buis Buergi AG, a Swiss law firm, to serve as the independent proxy at and until the conclusion of the Annual Shareholder Meeting in 2016. Mr. Paul Buergi of Buis Buergi AG has served as independent proxy at our Annual Shareholder Meetings since 2012.
If the shareholders do not approve this proposal, the Board may call an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders for reconsideration of this proposal.
Your Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR Buis Buergi AG as the independent proxy at and until the conclusion of the 2016 Annual Shareholder Meeting.
PROPOSAL 11
APPROVE THE 2015 COMPENSATION FOR EXECUTIVES
AS REQUIRED UNDER SWISS LAW
As discussed in Proposal 6 "Amend the Articles of Association to Provide for Say-on-Pay Votes Required Under Swiss Law", the company has proposed amendments to our Articles of Association so that the shareholders can approve the maximum amount of aggregate compensation that can be paid to our executive officers for 2015. Accordingly, the proposal described in this Proposal 11 gives shareholders the opportunity to approve the maximum aggregate amount of compensation that can be paid to our executive officers for 2015. The executive officers currently include the following ten senior executives: Messrs. Scott A. Carmilani, John R. Bender, Thomas A. Bradley, Wesley D. Dupont, Frank N. D'Orazio, John J. Gauthier, Marshall J. Grossack, Louis P. Iglesias, Julian James and John J. McElroy.
The general principles of the company's executive compensation programs are described in Article 20b of the amended Articles of Association attached hereto as Appendix B. A more detailed description of our executive compensation programs currently in effect and the actual amounts paid to our named executive officers for 2014 are described in our CD&A, which begins on page 50 of this Proxy Statement. As described more fully in the CD&A, the Compensation Committee has established a compensation philosophy and related practices and follows a disciplined process in implementing our executive compensation programs and in making individual executive compensation determinations. Please read the amended Articles of Association and the CD&A to understand our executive compensation philosophy and process when considering this proposal.
In addition, shareholders have had the opportunity since 2011 under U.S. securities law to cast a non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation paid to our named executive officers. There
-32-
are three primary differences between the votes under the U.S. securities laws and under the Swiss Ordinance in this Proxy Statement.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Securities Laws |
Swiss Ordinance |
||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Effect of Vote | | Advisory, non-binding | | Binding | | ||||||||
|
Persons Covered |
|
Five named executive officers |
|
All executive officers (currently ten in total) |
|
|||||||
| Compensation Year Covered | | 2014 | | 2015 | | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Our shareholders have strongly supported our executive compensation programs, providing approval in each year since the required vote became effective. At our Annual Shareholder Meetings held in 2012, 2013 and 2014, the shareholder approval levels have been 99.7%, 98.4% and 98.8%, respectively. The advisory vote required under the U.S. securities laws is still in effect, so our shareholders are again provided the opportunity to vote to approve the compensation paid to the named executive officers in 2014, as is more fully discussed in Proposal 13 "Advisory Vote on 2014 Executive Compensation as Required under U.S. Securities Laws".
For 2015, the company is proposing that shareholders approve the maximum aggregate compensation that can be paid to our executive officers in an amount not to exceed $39.6 million. This amount is the maximum amount that the Company can pay to our executive officers (other than additional amounts that may be payable to persons who newly assume executive officer functions after the Annual Shareholder Meeting) and has been calculated using conservative assumptions in order to provide the Board and the company's management flexibility to reward superior performance across all businesses and to address unforeseen circumstances that might arise during 2015. The table below provides the maximum amounts of compensation that could have been paid, granted or promised in 2014 and our estimates for maximum compensation levels for 2015. The comments provide insight into the assumptions we have used to make these estimates.
-33-
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
2014 Actual Compensation |
|
2015 Maximum Compensation for Approval |
|
Comments
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Base Salaries |
|
$5.4 |
|
$5.4 |
|
· 2014 and 2015 base salaries reflect actual salaries for our executive officers. |
|
||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Annual Cash Bonus |
$8.8 |
$11.2 |
· Cash bonuses for 2014 were received in February 2015 and cash bonuses for 2015 will be received in February 2016 · 2015 amount assumes maximum funding of the cash bonus pool at 200% upon achievement of superior performance |
||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Equity Awards |
|
$17.9 |
|
$18.2 |
|
· Includes time-vested RSU awards and performance-based awards · Performance-based awards are valued at 150% at the time of grant in 2015 because they can vest at 150% of target or value at grant |
|
||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Other Compensation |
$1.2 |
$1.2 |
· Includes benefits and perquisites that are described in more detail under "Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion & Analysis Retirement, Health and Welfare Benefits" and the Summary Compensation Table beginning on page 71 |
||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Uplift |
|
N/A |
|
$3.6 |
|
· A 10% increase has been added to the 2015 Maximum Compensation for Approval column to provide flexibility in the case of extraordinary circumstances or upon the achievement of superior performance |
|
||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Total Compensation |
$33.3 |
$39.6 |
· Shareholders are being requested to approve the $39.6 million of total compensation for 2015 |
||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
We do not anticipate that the aggregate amount paid to our executive officers in 2015 will be at the maximum amount requested. Actual compensation paid to our executive officers in 2014 was $33.3 million. Actual 2015 compensation will be dependent on our performance pursuant to our
-34-
compensation programs as described in the CD&A. For 2015, amounts paid to our executive officers will be awarded under the same executive compensation programs and under substantially the same terms as those in effect in 2014. Performance goals for 2015 were adjusted to reflect our financial plan and current strategy.
If the shareholders do not approve this proposal, the Board may call an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders for reconsideration of this proposal.
Your Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the approval of the maximum aggregate compensation that can be paid, granted or promised to our executive officers in 2015 in an amount not to exceed $39.6 million.
PROPOSAL 12
APPROVE THE 2015 COMPENSATION FOR DIRECTORS
AS REQUIRED UNDER SWISS LAW
As discussed in Proposal 6 "Amend the Articles of Association to Provide for Say-on-Pay Votes Required Under Swiss Law", the company has proposed amendments to our Articles of Association so that the shareholders can approve the maximum amount of aggregate compensation that can be paid to our directors in 2015. Accordingly, the proposal described in this Proposal 12 gives shareholders the opportunity to approve the aggregate amount of compensation that can be paid to our non-management directors in 2015.
The general principles of the company's director compensation programs are described in Article 20b of the amended Articles of Association attached hereto as Appendix B. A more detailed description of our director compensation programs currently in effect and the actual amounts paid to our non-management directors for 2014 are described in Proposal 7 "Elect the Board of Directors", which begins on page 20 of this Proxy Statement. The company does not currently have, and in the future does not plan to implement, a retirement benefit scheme for non-management directors.
For 2015, the company is proposing that shareholders approve maximum aggregate compensation that can be paid to our non-management directors in an amount not to exceed $2.31 million. This amount is the maximum amount that the company can pay to our non-management directors and has been calculated using conservative assumptions. The table below provides the actual amounts of compensation that were paid during 2014 and our estimates for maximum compensation
-35-
levels for 2015. The comments provide insight into the assumptions we have used to make these estimates.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
2014 Actual Compensation(1) |
|
2015 Maximum Compensation for Approval(1) |
|
Comments
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Retainer Fees |
|
$0.94 |
|
$0.85 |
|
· Includes (i) the annual cash retainer paid to each non-management director and (ii) the Lead Independent Director fee, committee chair fees and the fee paid to each member of the Audit Committee (other than the chairperson) |
|
||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Attendance Fees |
$0.33 |
$0.33 |
· Includes $3,000 for each Board meeting attended and $2,000 for each committee meeting attended. Assumes the number of meetings that were regularly scheduled in 2014 |
||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Equity Awards |
|
$0.53 |
|
$0.54 |
|
· Each non-management director received an annual equity grant valued at $90,000 in 2015 |
|
||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Other Compensation |
$0.03 |
$0.06 |
· Other compensation includes charitable matching grant contributions of $10,000 per year per director |
||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Uplift |
|
N/A |
|
$0.53 |
|
· A 30% increase has been added to the 2015 "Maximum Compensation for Approval" column to provide flexibility in the case of extraordinary circumstances or if additional Board or committee meetings are necessary |
|
||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Total Compensation |
$1.83 |
$2.31 |
· Shareholders are being requested to approve the $2.31 million of total compensation for 2015 |
||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
-36-
We do not anticipate that the aggregate amount paid to our directors in 2015 will be at the maximum amount requested. Actual 2015 compensation may be dependent on extraordinary circumstances that will require the Board and its committees to meet more frequently. For 2015, amounts paid to our directors will be awarded under the same director compensation programs and under substantially the same terms as those in effect in 2014.
If the shareholders do not approve this proposal, the Board may call an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders for reconsideration of this proposal.
Your Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the approval of the maximum aggregate compensation that can be paid, granted or promised to our directors in 2015 in an amount not to exceed $2.31 million.
PROPOSAL 13
ADVISORY VOTE ON 2014 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
AS REQUIRED UNDER U.S. SECURITIES LAWS
As required under U.S. securities laws, the company is providing its shareholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on executive compensation as described below. The company believes that it is appropriate to seek the views of shareholders on the design and effectiveness of the company's executive compensation program.
The objective of the company's executive compensation program is to attract and retain talented and highly-skilled employees, reward strong company and individual performance, align the interests of the executive officers and the company's shareholders and remain competitive with other insurance and reinsurance companies, particularly those with which the company competes. The company believes that its executive compensation program, which emphasizes long-term, performance-based equity awards, a significant portion of which is "at risk" with vesting dependent on the company achieving certain performance targets, meets this objective and is strongly aligned with the long-term interests of its shareholders. The "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section of this Proxy Statement beginning on page 50 describes the company's executive compensation program and the decisions made by the Compensation Committee in more detail.
The table below reflects the company's performance on a relative basis against its Peer Group of 13 insurance and reinsurance companies (the "Peer Group") for the one, three and five-year periods ended December 31, 2014.
Company's Performance Relative
to Its Peer Group as of December 31, 2014
(In quartiles. 1=first quartile, the highest level; 4=fourth quartile, the lowest level)
Performance Metric
|
2014 (one year) Rank |
2012-2014 (three year) Rank |
2010-2014 (five year) Rank |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diluted Book Value per Share Growth (adjusted for dividends) |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
||||
Annualized Net Income Return on Average Equity (adjusted for other comprehensive income) |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|||||||
Combined Ratio |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
||||
Total Shareholder Return |
4 |
1 |
1 |
-37-
Your Board unanimously recommends the approval of the following resolution:
RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the company's named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, compensation tables and narrative discussion, be, and hereby is, APPROVED.
As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding upon the company. However, the Compensation Committee, which is responsible for designing and administering the company's executive compensation programs, values the opinions expressed by shareholders in their vote on this proposal and will continue to consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for the named executive officers.
PROPOSAL 14
APPROVE THE 2014 ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The 2014 Annual Report, which accompanies this Proxy Statement, contains our audited consolidated financial statements and its audited statutory financial statements prepared in accordance with Swiss law, for the year ended December 31, 2014, as well as the reports of Deloitte Ltd. and Deloitte AG, our independent and statutory auditors, respectively. The 2014 Annual Report also contains information on our business activities and our business and financial condition. Pursuant to Swiss law, the 2014 Annual Report, our audited consolidated financial statements and our audited Swiss statutory financial statements must be submitted to shareholders for approval at the Annual Shareholder Meeting. The 2014 Annual Report will be available for physical inspection at our offices at Park Tower, 15th floor, Gubelstrasse 24, 6300, Zug, Switzerland. Representatives of Deloitte Ltd. and Deloitte AG will attend the Annual Shareholder Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if they wish. They will also be available to answer questions at the meeting.
If the shareholders do not approve this proposal, the Board may call an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders for reconsideration of this proposal.
Your Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the approval of our 2014 Annual Report, including our audited consolidated financial statements and audited Swiss statutory financial statements prepared in accordance with Swiss law, each for the year ended December 31, 2014.
PROPOSAL 15
APPROVE THE RETENTION OF DISPOSABLE PROFITS
As noted in Proposal 14 "Approve the 2014 Annual Report and Financial Statements" above, the 2014 Annual Report that accompanies this Proxy Statement contains the company's audited statutory financial statements prepared in accordance with Swiss law for the year ended December 31, 2014, as well as the report of Deloitte AG, our statutory auditors. For the year ended December 31, 2014, on a standalone basis, we had disposable profits of CHF 281.1 million (or approximately $287.8 million). The Board proposes that the disposable profit on the company's audited statutory financial statements be carried forward as retained earnings for fiscal year 2014. The Board believes that it is in the best interests of the company and its shareholders to retain earnings for future investment in the growth of our business and for other attractive business opportunities. As noted in Proposal 16 "Approve the Payment of Dividends to Shareholders" below, we are proposing that our shareholders receive cash dividends from general legal reserve from capital contributions. Accordingly, we are proposing that no dividend distribution be made at this time to shareholders from 2014 year-end disposable profits.
-38-
If the shareholders do not approve this proposal, the Board may call an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders for reconsideration of this proposal.
Your Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR carrying forward as retained earnings the company's disposable profits on its audited statutory financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014.
PROPOSAL 16
APPROVE THE PAYMENT OF DIVIDENDS TO SHAREHOLDERS
General Explanation of the Dividend
This agenda item calls for a distribution to shareholders out of general legal reserve from capital contributions, in an aggregate CHF amount equal to $1.04 per share (the "Base Annual Dividend"), using the USD/CHF currency exchange ratio as reported by The Wall Street Journal on the fourth New York business day prior to the date of the Annual Shareholder Meeting rounded down to the next cent amount (the "Foreign Exchange Rate") which can be divided by four, payable in four installments; provided that, each of the CHF installments will be adjusted pursuant to a formula so that the actual CHF amount for each installment will equal $0.26 per share, subject to an aggregate upward adjustment (the "Dividend Cap"), for the four installments of 50% of the Base Annual Dividend. Application of the formula will mean that the CHF amount of each installment will be determined at the approximate time of distribution, while the U.S. dollar value of the installment will remain $0.26 per share unless and until the Dividend Cap is reached. A quarterly installment that would otherwise exceed the Dividend Cap will be reduced to equal the CHF amount remaining available under the Dividend Cap, and the U.S. dollar amount distributed will be the then-applicable U.S. dollar equivalent of that CHF amount.
Agenda Item
The Board proposes that our shareholders voting (in person or by proxy) at our Annual Shareholder Meeting approve the following dividend in the form of a distribution from the company's "general legal reserve from capital contributions" account. The blank numbers in the following resolution will be completed based upon the company's actual share capital upon the date of the Annual Shareholder Meeting and applicable exchange rate calculations described below.
-39-
Reserves and the Aggregate Dividend Amount From Capital Contributions Reserves are subject to the following adjustments as a result of USD/CHF currency fluctuations:
Quarterly Dividend Amount From Capital Contributions Reserves = Quarterly Dollar Amount × USD/CHF currency exchange ratio as reported by The Wall Street Journal on June 9, 2015, for the first quarterly dividend payment, on September 8, 2015, for the second quarterly dividend payment, on December 8, 2015, for the third quarterly dividend payment, and on March 8, 2016, for the fourth quarterly dividend payment.
If the shareholders do not approve this proposal, the Board may call an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders for reconsideration of this proposal.
Your Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the payment of the dividend as described above, such payment to be made in four quarterly installments.
-40-
PROPOSAL 17
APPROVE THE CANCELLING OF TREASURY SHARES
The company has repurchased and holds in treasury 1,650,696 common shares under its 2012 share repurchase program. The company is seeking approval of a capital reduction through a cancellation of 1,650,696 common shares held in treasury that were repurchased under the 2012 share repurchase program. The cancellation of these shares will be made against "reserve for treasury shares from capital contributions". The cancellation of the treasury shares will have the effect of reducing the current share capital of the company by an aggregate amount of CHF 6,767,853.60.
Under Swiss law, a report from Deloitte AG, an auditor supervised by the Swiss government, will be available at the Annual Shareholder Meeting to confirm that the receivables of the creditors of the company are fully covered after the capital reduction resulting from the cancellation of the 1,650,696 common shares held in treasury. Upon satisfaction of all legal requirements, under Swiss law we will be required to submit an application to the Commercial Register in the Canton of Zug, Switzerland to register the amendments to our Articles of Association to cancel these treasury shares. Without effective registration, we will not be able to proceed with the cancellation of the treasury shares as described in this proposal. We cannot assure you that the Commercial Register in the Canton of Zug will approve the registration.
Pursuant to Swiss law, we are required to submit to you for your approval both the English version and the (authoritative) German version of the proposed amendments to the company's Articles of Association. Upon the approval of this proposal, Article 3 of the Articles of Association will be amended to read as follows:
"Artikel 3 Aktienkapital | "Article 3 Share Capital | |||||
a) |
Das Aktienkapital der Gesellschaft beträgt CHF 413'178'549.60 und ist eingeteilt in 100'775'256 auf den Namen lautende Aktien im Nennwert von CHF 4.10 je Aktie. Das Aktienkapital ist vollständig liberiert. |
a) |
The share capital of the Company amounts to CHF 413,178,549.60 and is divided into 100,775,256 registered shares with a par value of CHF 4.10 per share. The share capital is fully paid-in. |
|||
b) |
Auf Beschluss der Generalversammlung können jederzeit Namenaktien in Inhaberaktien und Inhaberaktien in Namenaktien umgewandelt werden." |
b) |
Upon resolution of the General Meeting of Shareholders, registered shares may be converted into bearer shares and bearer shares may be converted into registered shares, at any time." |
If the shareholders do not approve this proposal, the Board may call an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders for reconsideration of this proposal.
Your Board unanimously recommends that shareholders vote FOR the capital reduction by cancellation of 1,650,696 common shares held in treasury and the corresponding amendment to our Articles of Association.
PROPOSAL 18
ELECT DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR AND DELOITTE AG AS STATUTORY AUDITOR
Pursuant to Swiss law, the appointment of our independent and statutory auditors is subject to approval annually by the company's shareholders. The company's shareholders must elect an independent auditing firm for purposes of SEC reporting. The company's shareholders must also elect an auditing firm that will be responsible for auditing the company's consolidated financial statements and statutory financial statements. At the recommendation of the Audit Committee, your Board
-41-
unanimously recommends the election of Deloitte & Touche LLP ("Deloitte U.S.") as our independent auditor for purposes of SEC reporting and Deloitte AG as our statutory auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015. Deloitte AG has served as the company's statutory auditor since May 2010.
Change in Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
On February 16, 2015, the Audit Committee approved Deloitte U.S. to replace Deloitte Ltd. ("Deloitte Bermuda") as the company's independent auditor effective as of February 18, 2015. Factors that contributed to the transition to Deloitte U.S. as the company's independent auditor include Deloitte Bermuda's lead audit partner rotating off of the company's account following the 2014 year-end audit and the increased interaction between the staff of Deloitte U.S. and the Audit Committee and the company's senior management team. There have been no disagreements between the company and Deloitte Bermuda (who has served as the independent auditor of the company since April 2002) as described in more detail below.
The audit reports of Deloitte Bermuda on the company's consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014 did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. The audit reports of Deloitte Bermuda on the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013 and 2014 did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014 through the date of the Audit Committee's determination not to re-nominate Deloitte Bermuda (1) there were no "disagreements" (within the meaning set forth in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K) between the company and Deloitte Bermuda on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure; and (2) there were no "reportable events" (within the meaning set forth in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K) involving the Company.
The company has not, nor has anyone on its behalf, consulted Deloitte U.S. during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014 and the subsequent interim period through the date of the Audit Committee's approval of Deloitte U.S. regarding either (1) the application of accounting principles to a specific transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the consolidated financial statements of the company; or (2) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement or a "reportable event" as described in the preceding paragraph. Further, no written report or oral advice was provided by Deloitte U.S. to the company that Deloitte U.S. concluded was an important factor considered by the company in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue.
The company provided Deloitte Bermuda with a copy of the foregoing disclosure and it agrees with such disclosure in all respects.
Representatives of Deloitte Bermuda, Deloitte U.S. and Deloitte AG will attend the Annual Shareholder Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a Swiss statutory disclosure statement if they wish. They will also be available to answer questions at the meeting. If approved, Deloitte U.S. and Deloitte AG will serve as the company's independent and statutory auditors, respectively, for such compensation as the Audit Committee of your Board shall reasonably determine until the company's next Annual Shareholder Meeting.
Your Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the appointment of Deloitte U.S. as the company's independent auditor and Deloitte AG as its statutory auditor.
-42-
Fees to Independent Registered Public Accountants for Fiscal 2014 and 2013
The following table shows information about fees billed to us by Deloitte Bermuda and Deloitte AG and their affiliates for services rendered for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.
|
2014
|
2013
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Audit Fees |
$ |
4,501,735 |
$ |
3,887,261 |
|||
Audit-Related Fees(1) |
$ |
417,705 |
|
||||
Tax Fees |
$ |
|
|
|
|||
All Other Fees |
|
|
The Audit Committee has a policy to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditors and estimates therefor. The Audit Committee pre-approved all audit services and non-audit services and estimates therefor provided to the company by the independent auditors in 2014 and 2013.
PROPOSAL 19
ELECT PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS AG AS SPECIAL AUDITOR
Under Swiss law, special reports by an auditor are required in connection with certain corporate transactions, including certain types of increases in share capital. We have been informed that, because of the auditor independence requirements under U.S. federal securities laws, Deloitte AG cannot act as our special auditing firm with respect to certain types of capital increases.
At the recommendation of the Audit Committee, your Board unanimously recommends the election of PricewaterhouseCoopers AG, an auditor supervised by the Swiss government, as the company's special auditing firm until the next Annual Shareholder Meeting. If the company's shareholders do not approve this proposal, the Board may call an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders for reconsideration of this proposal by shareholders.
Your Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the election of PricewaterhouseCoopers AG as the company's special auditors.
PROPOSAL 20
DISCHARGE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS FROM LIABILITIES
As is customary for Swiss corporations and in accordance with Article 698, subsection 2, item 5 of the Swiss Code of Obligations, shareholders are requested to discharge from liability all the individuals who served as members of the Board or as executive officers of the company for their activities during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 that have been disclosed, or are otherwise known, to the shareholders. The release binds only the company and the shareholders who either voted in favor of the proposal or who subsequently acquired shares with the knowledge of this resolution.
-43-
Under Swiss law, the right of shareholders who do not vote in favor of this proposal to bring an action against the directors and/or executive officers with respect to the matters discharged is extinguished within six months after approval of this proposal by the shareholders.
Your Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the discharge from liability of all the individuals who served as members of the Board or as executive officers of the company for their activities during the year ended December 31, 2014.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The company has no related-party transactions to report.
Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons
Pursuant to our Audit Committee charter, the Audit Committee reviews and approves the related-party transactions we enter into. We do not have formal written standards in connection with the review and approval of related-party transactions as we believe each transaction should be analyzed on its own merits. In making its decision, the Audit Committee will review, among other things, the relevant agreement, analyze the specific facts and circumstances and speak with, or receive a memorandum from, management that outlines the background and terms of the transaction. As insurance and reinsurance companies enter into various transactions in the ordinary course of business, the Audit Committee does not review these types of transactions to the extent they are open-market transactions that happen to involve related parties.
-44-
The table below sets forth information as of February 25, 2015 regarding the beneficial ownership of our common shares by:
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
Beneficial Owner of Common Shares(1) |
||||
| | | | | |
|
Number of Common Shares |
Percentage of Common Shares |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | |
Artisan Partners Holdings LP(2) |
6,147,240 |
6.4% |
|||
FMR LLC(3) |
|
6,722,989 |
7.0% |
||
The Vanguard Group, Inc.(4) |
5,983,533 |
6.2% |
|||
Barbara T. Alexander |
|
21,510 |
(5) |
* |
|
Scott A. Carmilani |
1,477,837 |
(6) |
1.5% |
||
James F. Duffy |
|
35,814 |
* |
||
Bart Friedman |
39,690 |
* |
|||
Scott Hunter |
|
32,996 |
* |
||
Patrick de Saint-Aignan |
24,705 |
* |
|||
Eric S. Schwartz |
|
107,155 |
(7) |
* |
|
Samuel J. Weinhoff |
36,444 |
* |
|||
Thomas A. Bradley |
|
5,050 |
* |
||
Wesley D. Dupont |
220,018 |
(8) |
* |
||
Frank N. D'Orazio |
|
219,249 |
(9) |
* |
|
Louis P. Iglesias |
2,491 |
* |
|||
All directors and executive officers as a group (18 persons) |
|
2,795,342 |
(10) |
2.9% |
-45-
outstanding. All amounts listed represent sole voting and dispositive power unless otherwise indicated.
-46-
Our executive officers are elected by and serve at the discretion of your Board. The following table identifies the executive officers of the company, including their respective ages and positions as of the date hereof.
Name |
Age |
Position |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | |
Scott A. Carmilani(1) |
|
50 |
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board |
||
John R. Bender |
50 |
Chief Executive Officer, Reinsurance, Allied World Reinsurance Management Company |
|||
Thomas A. Bradley |
|
57 |
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
||
Wesley D. Dupont |
46 |
Executive Vice President & General Counsel |
|||
Frank N. D'Orazio |
|
46 |
President, Underwriting and Global Risk |
||
John J. Gauthier |
53 |
Executive Vice President & Chief Investment Officer |
|||
Marshall J. Grossack |
|
55 |
Executive Vice President & Chief Actuary |
||
Louis P. Iglesias |
51 |
President, North America |
|||
Julian James |
|
51 |
President, Global Markets |
||
John J. McElroy |
50 |
Chief Operating Officer |
|||
Kent W. Ziegler |
|
52 |
Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting Officer |
John R. Bender has been the Chief Executive Officer, Reinsurance of Allied World Reinsurance Management Company since August 2014 and oversees our reinsurance platform on a global basis. From February 2012 to August 2014, he served as the President of Allied World Reinsurance Management Company. From August 2009 to February 2012, he served as the President and Chief Operating Officer of Allied World Reinsurance Company, one of our subsidiaries. He joined us in November 2007 as the Chief Operating Officer of Allied World Reinsurance Company. From November 2007 through November 2011, Mr. Bender was responsible for establishing and expanding the company's U.S. reinsurance platform and for overseeing its day-to-day operations. Since December 2011, Mr. Bender has assumed responsibility for providing strategic leadership and executing business strategies for our global reinsurance operations. Prior to joining us, Mr. Bender held several senior management positions at Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd., including Chief Underwriting Officer, Casualty from November 2005 to October 2007 and Senior Vice President, Commercial Liability Products from October 2002 to November 2005. From 1989 to October 2002, he held numerous claims and underwriting positions with St. Paul Reinsurance Management Company.
Thomas A. Bradley joined the company as Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer in September 2012. Prior to joining us, Mr. Bradley had served as the Chief Financial Officer of Dorsey & Whitney LLP, a large international law firm, since August 2011. From April 2009 to April 2011,
-47-
Mr. Bradley served in various financial positions at the Fair Isaac Corporation, a business services company, including as its Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. From April 2004 to February 2009, Mr. Bradley served in various financial and operational positions at Zurich Financial North America, a financial services company, including as its Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to that, he held a host of senior financial and operational positions at USF&G Corporation/St. Paul Companies.
Wesley D. Dupont has been our Executive Vice President & General Counsel since September 2009 and presently oversees our legal, compliance, claims and human resources functions on a global basis. From December 2005 to September 2009, he served as our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and served as our Corporate Secretary through May 2012. In November 2003, Mr. Dupont began working for American International Company Limited, a subsidiary of AIG, and began providing legal services to us pursuant to an administrative services contract with American International Company Limited. Through that contract, Mr. Dupont served as our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from April 2004 until November 30, 2005. As of December 1, 2005, Mr. Dupont became an employee of our company. Prior to joining American International Company Limited, Mr. Dupont worked as an attorney at Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP, a large international law firm, where he specialized in general corporate and securities law. From April 2000 to July 2002, Mr. Dupont was a Managing Director and the General Counsel for Fano Securities, LLC, a specialized securities brokerage firm. Prior to that, Mr. Dupont worked as an attorney at Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, another large international law firm, where he also specialized in general corporate and securities law.
Frank N. D'Orazio has been the President, Underwriting and Global Risk since December 31, 2014 and is responsible for the oversight and governance of our underwriting activities, enterprise risk management and ceded reinsurance strategies globally. From September 2009 to December 2014, Mr. D'Orazio served as the President Bermuda and International Insurance of Allied World Assurance Company, Ltd, one of our subsidiaries, where he was responsible for providing strategic leadership and executing business strategies for the Bermuda, Europe and Asia insurance platforms. Prior to that, he served as the Chief Underwriting Officer of Allied World Assurance Company, Ltd since September 2008. From March 2005 to September 2008, Mr. D'Orazio was the company's Senior Vice President General Casualty where he was responsible for managing the company's general casualty and healthcare operations in Bermuda, Europe and the United States. Mr. D'Orazio joined the company in June 2003 as Vice President General Casualty. Prior to joining our company, Mr. D'Orazio worked for the retail insurance market arm of Munich-American Re-Insurance from August 1994 to May 2003, where he held a succession of underwriting and management positions. Mr. D'Orazio held various underwriting positions in the excess casualty division of Chubb from June 1990 to July 1994.
John J. Gauthier, CFA, has been our Executive Vice President & Chief Investment Officer since May 2011 and oversees the management of the company's investment portfolio. In September 2012, he was also named President of Allied World Financial Services, Inc. and Allied World Financial Services, Ltd, subsidiaries of the company. Since March 2010, he has served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer of AWAC Services Company, a subsidiary of the company. From October 2008 through February 2010, he served as Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer of AWAC Services Company. Previous to joining our company, Mr. Gauthier was Global Head of Insurance Fixed Income Portfolio Management at Goldman Sachs Asset Management from February 2005 to September 2008. Prior to that position, from 1997 to January 2005 he was Managing Director and Portfolio Manager at Conning Asset Management where he oversaw investment strategy for all property and casualty insurance company clients. Mr. Gauthier also served as Vice President at General Reinsurance/New England Asset Management, as well as a Portfolio Manager at General Reinsurance.
Marshall J. Grossack has been our Executive Vice President-Chief Actuary since September 2009. He served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Corporate Actuary from July 2004 to September
-48-
2009. From June 2002 until July 2004, Mr. Grossack was a Vice President and Actuary for American International Company Limited, a subsidiary of AIG, and provided services to us pursuant to a former administrative services contract with American International Company Limited. From June 1999 until June 2002, Mr. Grossack worked as the Southwest Region Regional Actuary for subsidiaries of AIG in Dallas, Texas.
Louis P. Iglesias has been the President, North America for Allied World Assurance Company (U.S.) Inc. and Allied World National Assurance Company, two of our subsidiaries, since January 31, 2014 and is responsible for providing strategic leadership and executing business strategies for our United States and Canada insurance platforms. Since December 31, 2014, he has also been responsible for providing strategic leadership and executing business strategies for our Bermuda insurance platform. From April 2012 through January 2014, he was the President, U.S. Property & Casualty for Allied World Assurance Company (U.S.) Inc. and Allied World National Assurance Company. From 1994 to April 2012, Mr. Iglesias served in various senior management positions at AIG, including Chief Executive Officer for Commercial Casualty, President for the Risk Management Group, President for AIG Environmental and President of AIG Construction. Prior to AIG, Mr. Iglesias worked at Travelers and Reliance insurance companies.
Julian James has been the President, Global Markets of Allied World Assurance Company (Europe) Limited since December 31, 2014 and is responsible for providing strategic leadership and executing business strategies for our European, Latin American, Asian and Lloyd's Syndicate 2232 insurance platforms. In addition, Mr. James has served as the Chief Executive Officer of our Lloyd's Managing Agency since April 2014. From March 2013 to December 2014, Mr. James served as the President of Allied World Assurance Company (Europe) Limited and was responsible for providing strategic leadership and executing business strategies for the company's European insurance platform. From September 2007 to January 2013, Mr. James served as the Chief Executive Officer at Lockton International. From 1997 to April 2007, Mr. James held senior management positions at Lloyd's, most recently as Director, Worldwide Markets, where he was responsible for all Lloyd's commercial activities outside of the United Kingdom, including the management of its trading licenses as well as oversight of its global branding and communications. Before joining Lloyd's, Mr. James was the Development Director of brokers Sedgwick Energy and Marine Limited and a member of the division's Executive Management Committee. Prior to that, he spent five years working in senior positions with Sedgwick, where he began his career in 1981, in North America.
John J. McElroy was appointed our Chief Operating Officer in March 2012. In this role, he oversees the Company's operations and administration, information technology, new product development, marketing, broker relations and project management on a global basis. From May 2008 through February 2012, Mr. McElroy served as President, Professional Lines, of Allied World Assurance Company (U.S.) Inc. and Allied World National Assurance Company and oversaw the underwriting of all directors and officers liability, errors and omissions liability and medical malpractice liability insurance products by the Company's U.S. insurance operations. From June 2004, when he joined us, through April 2008, Mr. McElroy served as our Senior Vice President, Field Operations Officer, during which time he was responsible for expanding our U.S. insurance operations, developing our network of U.S. offices and increasing brand and product visibility. Prior to joining us, Mr. McElroy worked with Gulf Insurance Group for 12 years where he held various underwriting and other senior management positions. He began his career at AIG underwriting directors and officers liability insurance for large commercial risks.
Kent W. Ziegler has been our Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting Officer since February 2013. Prior to joining us, from January 2010 through January 2013, Mr. Ziegler served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Retail Real Estate Division of JPMorgan Chase & Co. From 2005 to 2009, Mr. Ziegler served in JPMorgan Chase's Business Banking Division, most recently as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. From 1989 to 2004, Mr. Ziegler served in various financial and operational positions at Gulf Insurance Group, including as the Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer. He began his career in public accounting at Ernst & Young.
-49-
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Executive Summary
In accordance with the rules of the NYSE, a majority of the members of the Board are independent and the Compensation Committee is presently comprised of six independent Board members. The Board has adopted a Compensation Committee Charter discussed earlier in this Proxy Statement. The Compensation Committee oversees our compensation programs and makes recommendations to the Board. Pursuant to Swiss law, the Board is required to make all final compensation decisions regarding the NEOs. We have achieved considerable growth since our inception in November 2001 and our compensation programs have been designed to reward executives who contribute to our continuing success.
The Compensation Committee has selected Farient Advisors, LLC ("Farient") as its independent compensation advisor. At the committee's direction, Farient has conducted an extensive review of our executive compensation strategy and programs to ensure strong alignment between executive compensation, business strategy and long-term shareholder value creation.
Compensation Philosophy. The insurance and reinsurance industry is very competitive, cyclical and often volatile, and our success depends in substantial part on our ability to attract and retain successful, high-achieving employees who will remain motivated and committed to the company during all insurance industry cycles. We have a strong pay for performance philosophy. We start with the notion that for our compensation program for our executives as a group, total compensation should be at the median of our market, and we set base salaries with this pay positioning in mind. However, if our performance is high relative to our Peer Group, we pay actual cash bonuses and grant long-term equity incentive awards in-line with that performance. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee believes that an effective executive compensation program is one that is designed to:
![]() |
Reward strong company and individual performance, |
||
![]() |
Align the interests of the executive officers with the company's shareholders, and |
||
![]() |
Balance the objectives of pay-for-performance and retention. |
The Compensation Committee's objectives for the company's compensation programs include:
![]() |
Driving and rewarding employee performance that supports the company's business objectives and financial success; |
||
![]() |
Attracting and retaining talented and highly-skilled employees; |
||
![]() |
Aligning the interests of the NEOs with the company's shareholders by: |
· |
having a substantial portion of compensation in long-term, performance-based equity awards, a large portion of which is "at risk" with vesting dependent on the company achieving certain performance targets over time, particularly at the senior officer level where such persons can more directly affect the company's financial success; |
||
· |
regularly evaluating the company's compensation programs to help ensure that they do not encourage excessive risk taking; |
-50-
· |
tying incentive opportunity to a blend of metrics that focus on key company objectives, correlate with the creation of shareholder value and encourage prudent risk taking; and |
![]() |
Remaining competitive with other insurance and reinsurance companies, particularly other insurance and reinsurance companies with which the company competes for talent. |
Net Income Return on Equity (Adjusted for other comprehensive income) |
Diluted Book Value per Share Growth(1) | |
![]() |
![]() |
Components of Executive Compensation. The components of our executive compensation program and the terms of each are shown in the table below:
Components of Executive Compensation
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Element |
|
Type |
|
Terms |
| |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Cash |
|
Base Salary |
· The fixed element of each NEO's annual cash compensation. |
||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
Annual Cash Bonus |
· A cash incentive opportunity based upon the achievement of annual goals. · The performance measures used to fund the bonus pool include: o Earnings before interest and taxes ("EBIT") (weighted one-third); o Return on equity ("ROE") relative to our Peer Group (as defined below) (weighted one-third); and o A corporate scorecard of financial, operational and strategic objectives (weighted one-third). · Individual performance is used to determine the allocation of the bonus pool. |
||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
-51-
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Equity-Based |
|
Performance-Based |
· An opportunity to earn shares in the company (or an equivalent value in cash) with vesting dependent upon our achieving certain performance targets over a three-year performance period. · The performance measures used to determine the actual versus target number of shares earned include: o Book value growth calculated on a compounded annual growth rate ("CAGR") basis (weighted one-half); and o ROE relative to our Peer Group (weighted one-half). |
||||||||
|
|
|
For more information, please see "2014 Equity-Based Compensation "How is Book Value Calculated?" and "2014 Equity-Based Compensation How is ROE calculated and defined?" |
|||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
Restricted Stock |
· An opportunity to earn shares in the company (or an equivalent value in cash) with vesting dependent upon our NEOs satisfying time-based vesting conditions. · RSUs generally vest pro rata over four years. |
||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Retirement |
|
401(k) Plan |
· A qualified savings plan that provides participants with the opportunity to defer a portion of their compensation, up to IRS tax code limitations, and receive a company matching contribution. |
||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
Supplemental |
· A plan that supplements the 401(k) plan by providing, on a non-qualified basis, for deferral of compensation in excess of the IRS tax code limitations. |
||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Other |
|
Perquisites |
· Certain other benefits provided to executives by the company. |
||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
-52-
The mix of our total direct compensation (comprised of base salary, annual cash bonus and equity-based incentive compensation) for our NEOs at grant value is shown below:
As shown in the charts above, the Compensation Committee manages the pay mix such that a substantial portion of pay is dedicated to "at risk" compensation, including annual cash bonuses and equity-based incentive compensation. The Compensation Committee believes that this mix of pay best aligns the interests of our executives, including the NEOs, with those of our shareholders over time.
We use ROE for both our short-term cash bonus program and our long-term, equity-based compensation program because:
Our Compensation Practices. We continue to implement and maintain what we believe are leading practices in our compensation program and related areas. These practices include the following:
-53-
(see "Stock Ownership Policy" below). We also have stock ownership requirements for our directors, as discussed earlier in this Proxy Statement.
The Role of Shareholder Say-on-Pay Votes. We provide our shareholders with the opportunity to cast an annual advisory vote on executive compensation (the "say-on-pay proposal") under U.S. securities laws in addition to binding say-on-pay votes required under Swiss law. At our Annual Shareholder Meeting held in May 2014, 98.8% of the votes cast were in favor of the say-on-pay proposal. The Compensation Committee believes this affirms our shareholders' support of our approach to executive compensation, and the committee did not change its approach in 2014. The Compensation Committee will continue to consider the outcome of the company's say-on-pay votes when making future compensation decisions for the NEOs and other senior officers at the company.
Compensation Oversight and Process
The Compensation Committee has established a number of processes to assist it in ensuring that NEO compensation is achieving its objectives. Among those are:
-54-
In determining the level of compensation for the NEOs, both quantitative and qualitative factors of the company's and each NEO's performance are analyzed. The Compensation Committee primarily uses formulaic factors to assess company performance. However, due to the potential volatility of the insurance and reinsurance industry and thus the company's financial results, the Compensation Committee believes that it is appropriate to also use non-formulaic factors to assess company and individual performance.
Relationship Between Pay and Performance. The success of the company's business and resulting value for our shareholders is contingent upon our successfully selecting, pricing and managing insurance and reinsurance risks over the long-term. Our business requires that we assess, select and respond to identified market opportunities in a highly disciplined and cost effective manner. To reinforce this approach, our executive compensation program is designed to align executives' interests closely with shareholder interests by tying executive compensation directly to equity results, as well as to those financial and strategic results that drive shareholder value, including sustainable, profitable growth; high returns; efficient, risk-adjusted capital deployment; and the company's strategic positioning. In this regard, key features of our executive compensation program include:
In 2014, the Compensation Committee reviewed an assessment conducted by Farient on the company's pay and performance alignment. Farient determined that the company's performance has consistently been in the top quartile compared to our peers, despite challenging market conditions, including excess capacity and increased competition as well as continuing economic turmoil. Farient also determined that our CEO's compensation (calculated using both a grant date equity value and performance-adjusted equity value) was in the top quartile of other Peer Group CEOs. The company's quartile rank in performance is shown in the chart below:
-55-
Company's Performance Relative
to Its Peer Group as of December 31, 2014
(In quartiles. 1=first quartile, the highest level; 4=fourth quartile, the lowest level)
Performance Metric
|
2014 (one year) Rank |
2012-2014 (three year) Rank |
2010-2014 (five year) Rank |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diluted Book Value per Share Growth (adjusted for dividends) |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
||||
Annualized Net Income Return on Average Equity (adjusted for other comprehensive income) |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|||||||
Combined Ratio |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
||||
Total Shareholder Return |
4 |
1 |
1 |
Given our high relative performance, as well as the Compensation Committee's philosophy that pay should be commensurate with performance, the committee determined that our CEO compensation has been positioned appropriately. The Compensation Committee is committed to ensuring that CEO and other NEO compensation are appropriately aligned with performance, and will continue to monitor our pay-for-performance alignment as an input in making pay decisions.
Assessment of Individual Performance. All of our NEOs have specific objectives that are established at the beginning of each year. Each NEO's performance (other than our CEO's performance) is reviewed annually by Mr. Carmilani, our CEO, based on his individual skills and qualifications, management responsibilities and initiatives, staff development and the achievement of departmental, geographic and/or established business goals and objectives, depending on the role of the NEO. Each NEO's performance was assessed on both company and individual achievements in light of current market conditions. Mr. Carmilani's performance was reviewed by the Compensation Committee and was also assessed on both the company's achievements and his individual achievements in light of current market conditions in the insurance and reinsurance industry. In 2014, these performance reviews formed the basis on which compensation-related decisions were made for annual cash bonuses and grants of performance-based and time-vested RSU awards, as well as 2015 base salaries and target bonus opportunities.
Roles of the CEO and the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee recommends to the Board for approval the company's compensation programs and the total amount available for the base salaries, cash bonuses and equity-based compensation for the NEOs and the other executive officers as a group. The Compensation Committee also determines the company's compensation philosophy and objectives and sets the framework for the NEOs' compensation structure. Within this framework, Mr. Carmilani, our CEO, recommends to the Compensation Committee all aspects of compensation for each NEO, excluding himself. He reviews the recommendations, survey data and other materials provided to him by our Human Resources Department and Farient as well as proxy statements and other publicly available information of our industry peers. He also assesses the company's and each NEO's performance as described above. The conclusions and recommendations resulting from these reviews and consultations, including proposed salary adjustments, annual cash bonus amounts and equity award amounts, are then presented to the Compensation Committee for its review and consideration. The Compensation Committee has discretion to modify any recommendation it receives from Mr. Carmilani, but strongly relies on his recommendations.
The Board and NEO Interactions. The Board has the opportunity to meet with the NEOs regularly during the year. In 2014, the company's NEOs met with and made presentations to the Board
-56-
regarding their respective business lines or responsibilities. The company believes that the interaction among its NEOs and the Board is important in enabling the Board, including the members of the Compensation Committee, to form its own assessment of each NEO's performance.
The Roles of Our Independent Advisors. The Compensation Committee directed Farient to conduct analyses on key aspects of NEO and other senior officer pay and performance, and to provide recommendations about compensation plan design. Farient reports directly to the Compensation Committee and in 2014 did not provide any non-executive consulting services to the company that would require disclosure under SEC rules. Farient meets with members of senior management to gain a greater understanding of key issues facing the company and to review its cash and equity compensation programs. The Compensation Committee meets separately with Farient to review in detail all compensation-related decisions regarding the CEO as well as the structure of the company's compensation programs. During this review, the Compensation Committee also receives Farient's analyses of the Peer Group, NEO pay and performance for the company and its peers, a compensation risk assessment, analyses of compensation best practices and current compensation trends.
The Compensation Committee has also engaged Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP ("Simpson Thacher") as its outside legal counsel to provide advice on the company's compensation programs and related public disclosures as well as to provide guidance on matters requested by the committee from time to time.
The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Farient and Simpson Thacher pursuant to SEC rules and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent Farient or Simpson Thacher from serving as an independent advisor to the Compensation Committee.
Timing of Awards. The Compensation Committee believes that compensation decisions regarding employees should be made after year-end results have been determined to better align employee compensation with company performance and shareholder value. This requires that annual cash bonuses, equity awards and base salary adjustments be determined after year-end financials have been prepared and completed. The Compensation Committee's policy is to approve compensation decisions at its regularly scheduled meeting during the first quarter of the year.
Benchmarking. The Compensation Committee reviews our competitive pay positioning annually based on a report prepared by Farient. Farient compiles data on over 40 of our top positions, including our NEOs, using a number of nationally recognized surveys covering the property and casualty insurance and reinsurance industry as well as general industry surveys. In addition, Farient uses proxy data for the CEO and CFO positions from our Peer Group. Farient compiles data on base salaries, target annual bonus opportunities, target equity-based incentive compensation values and total direct compensation, which is the sum of all three components. The Compensation Committee uses this information as one input, among others, such as individual performance and retention requirements, for making compensation decisions regarding salary increases, target bonus opportunities and equity-based incentive compensation awards each year.
Peer Group. The Compensation Committee asks Farient to review the company's Peer Group on an annual basis. For 2014, the company's Peer Group is comprised of 13 insurance and reinsurance companies, selected primarily because they are similar to the company in terms of property and casualty insurance and reinsurance business mix; percentage of U.S. and non-U.S. business written; focus on specialty insurance; high-quality financial strength; and size, as measured by gross premiums written, total revenue and market capitalization. Farient uses the Peer Group for purposes of assessing total direct compensation for the CEO and CFO positions; program design, including measures and goals; pay practices; equity plan burn-rate and share overhang; business performance; an analysis of pay and performance; and Board compensation.
-57-
The 13 Peer Group companies used by the Compensation Committee as inputs for 2014 pay design and pay level decisions are as follows:
Arch Capital Group Ltd. |
|
Markel Corporation |
||
Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd. |
The Navigators Group, Inc. |
|||
Aspen Insurance Holdings Limited |
|
Pro Assurance Corporation |
||
Axis Capital Holdings Limited |
RLI Corp. |
|||
Endurance Specialty Holdings Ltd. |
|
W. R. Berkley Corporation |
||
The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. |
XL Group plc |
|||
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
Assessment of Risks Associated with Compensation. The Compensation Committee has evaluated whether our compensation policies and programs encourage excessive risk taking. As part of this evaluation, the Compensation Committee reviewed a detailed compensation risk assessment conducted by Farient. In its assessment, Farient established both quantitative and qualitative criteria for assessing the company's compensation programs, and evaluated numerous elements of the company's pay mix, its compensation-related performance measurements, its governance and its processes and procedures that mitigate risk in its compensation programs. In addition to the above assessment, at the Compensation Committee's request, Farient also conducted a review of the pay programs and risk mitigation policies covering certain executives that have direct responsibility for decisions that impact the company's risk position. Based on these assessments, Farient concluded and the Compensation Committee concurred that the company's balanced pay and performance program coupled with its risk mitigation policies effectively prevent excessive risk taking.
Total Compensation Review. Each year, the Compensation Committee reviews a summary report or "tallysheet" prepared by the company for each NEO as well as the other executive officers. The purpose of a tallysheet is to show the aggregate dollar value of each officer's total annual compensation, including base salary, annual cash bonus, equity-based compensation, perquisites and all other compensation earned over the past two years. The tallysheet also shows amounts payable to each NEO upon termination of his employment under various severance and change-in-control scenarios. Tallysheets are reviewed by our Compensation Committee for informational purposes.
The table below reflects the process and philosophy by which the Compensation Committee calculated executive compensation in 2014 for our NEOs and is intended to assist shareholders in understanding the elements of total compensation as determined by the Compensation Committee. This information differs from the calculation of total compensation in accordance with the disclosure rules of the SEC, primarily by disclosing the grant date fair value of equity awards granted in 2015 for the prior year 2014 performance. A table further on in this Proxy Statement under the heading "Summary Compensation Table" reflects the SEC methodology. The following discussion describes the relationship between the amounts reported in the table below and those amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table and related tables. While the table below is presented to explain how the Compensation Committee determines compensation, the table and its accompanying disclosure are not
-58-
a substitute for the tables and disclosures required by the SEC's rules. The tables and related disclosures required by the SEC's rules begin on page 71.
Named Executive Officer |
Base Salary(1) |
Cash Bonus Paid in 2015 for 2014 Performance(2) |
Time-Vested RSUs Granted in 2015 for 2014 Performance(3)(4) |
Performance- Based Awards Granted in 2015 for 2014 Performance(3)(4) |
2014 Total Compensation(5) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scott A. Carmilani |
$ 1,000,000 |
$ 1,884,000 |
$ 1,449,853 |
$ 4,349,598 |
$ 8,683,451 |
|||||
Thomas A. Bradley |
$ 500,000 |
$ 855,000 |
$ 249,995 |
$ 749,907 |
$ 2,354,902 |
|||||
Wesley D. Dupont |
$ 500,000 |
$ 855,000 |
$ 249,995 |
$ 749,907 |
$ 2,354,902 |
|||||
Frank N. D'Orazio |
$ 500,000 |
$ 825,000 |
$ 224,995 |
$ 674,947 |
$ 2,224,942 |
|||||
Louis P. Iglesias |
$ 525,000 |
$ 830,000 |
$ 212,496 |
$ 637,448 |
$ 2,204,944 |
-59-
2014 Cash Compensation
2014 Base Salaries. As part of its assessment in late 2014 in preparation for pay actions in early 2015, the Compensation Committee determined that our CEO's annual salary of $1 million was between the 50th and 75th percentiles of the market and that no change in salary was warranted. In addition, the Compensation Committee determined that Messrs. Bradley, Dupont, D'Orazio and Iglesias continue to be positioned similarly to one another at approximately one-half of the CEO's salary. The Compensation Committee made this decision in order to (i) achieve its objective of internal equity; (ii) position average salaries between the 50th and 75th percentiles of the market; and (iii) avoid the need to increase salaries annually, unless dictated by significant competitive or internal considerations.
2014 Annual Cash Bonus. The company has established a structured, yet flexible, cash bonus program that has two facets: (1) an overall cash bonus pool that is funded based on the company's financial and qualitative performance and (2) a process by which the overall cash bonus pool is allocated to individuals based on individual target awards and performance. As in prior years, a target bonus percentage was established in February 2014 for each employee, including the NEOs, who were eligible to participate in the plan. The CEO's target bonus as a percentage of salary was based on the Compensation Committee's competitive assessment of the market and was set to be commensurate with the market. The target bonus as a percentage of salary for the other NEOs was set with the view that there should be a reasonable separation between the percentages for the CEO and the other NEOs, and that the target bonus percentages for all other NEOs should be the same given the relative importance and impact of each NEO's role. Target bonus percentages for the NEOs and other senior officers were recommended by the CEO and approved by the Compensation Committee. The CEO's target bonus percentage was determined solely by the Compensation Committee.
Our NEOs were eligible to receive an annual cash bonus based on a percentage of their annual base salary as follows:
Name |
2014 Bonus Target Percentage |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | |
Scott A. Carmilani |
|
120% |
||
Thomas A. Bradley |
100% |
|||
Wesley D. Dupont |
|
100% |
||
Frank N. D'Orazio |
100% |
|||
Louis P. Iglesias |
|
100% |
-60-
The methodology used to determine the 2014 annual cash bonus pool from which individual bonuses were paid is shown below:
2014 Annual Cash Bonus Plan |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
EBIT ($ in Millions) |
EBIT Goal Range |
EBIT Funding Level (% of Target) |
|
Adjusted ROE Relative to the Peer Group |
ROE Funding Level (% of Target) |
|
Corporate Scorecard |
Scorecard Funding Level (% of Target) |
|
Total Cash Bonus Funding |
||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weight |
33.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
33.3% |
|
|
|
|
33.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Maximum |
³ $568M |
160 |
% |
200 |
% |
³ 75th Percentile |
200 |
% |
150 |
% |
|||||||||||||||||||
Target |
$355M |
|
100 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
|
50th Percentile |
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
||||||||
Threshold |
$249M |
70 |
% |
50 |
% |
30th Percentile |
20 |
% |
0 |
% |
|||||||||||||||||||
Below Threshold |
< $249M |
|
N/A |
|
0 |
|
< 30th Percentile |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Actual |
$578.5M |
163 |
% |
200 |
% |
62nd Percentile |
146 |
% |
125 |
% |
157 |
% |
The maximum funding for each formulaic (i.e., financial) metric was 200%, the maximum funding for the non-formulaic (i.e., corporate scorecard) metric was 150% and the aggregate maximum funding for the 2014 annual cash bonus plan was capped at 182%. The objective of this structure was to provide predictability of award outcomes for participants while also permitting the Compensation Committee to take into consideration non-formulaic objectives.
Why use EBIT as a financial metric?
The Compensation Committee selected EBIT as one of the financial metrics for the 2014 fiscal year because it believed it was the most comprehensive and relevant measure of our annual results and also correlated closely with shareholder value. In previous years, the Compensation Committee selected EBIT plus other comprehensive income ("CIBIT") as the financial metric. The change to EBIT from CIBIT was due to the fact that the company has not had "other comprehensive income" since 2013 and does not expect to have any in the future.
How is EBIT calculated?
EBIT is calculated by taking the company's net income and adding back interest expense and tax expense.
What was the level of EBIT achievement in 2014?
In 2014, EBIT was $578.5 million, derived as follows (based on approximate totals): $490.3 million of net income, plus $57.7 million of interest expense, plus $30.5 million of income tax expense, equals $578.5 million of EBIT. Based on the $568 million Maximum Target reflected in the table above, this portion of the cash bonus pool was 200% funded.
-61-
How were the EBIT goals for 2014 determined?
The target for the 2014 annual cash bonus pool was based on budgeted EBIT for the company. The Compensation Committee determined that this target was a fair yet demanding goal, consistent with its philosophy to reward strong company and individual performance, and recognizing that the company continued to face significant challenges in growing its business at a time of heavy competition, excess capacity in the insurance and reinsurance marketplace, and a low fixed-income rate environment. The threshold and maximum goals were selected based on typical ranges used by the Peer Group to ensure that the company's cash bonus program remained competitive.
Why use ROE relative to the Peer Group as a financial metric?
The Compensation Committee selected ROE relative to the Peer Group because it believes that it is important to have relative performance measures and because it believes this metric strongly correlates with long-term shareholder value. ROE is also a common measure used in the industry and, as a measurement of return, complements well with the EBIT metric by emphasizing profitable growth.
How is ROE calculated and defined?
For purposes of the company's annual cash bonus plan, "ROE" is defined as the one-year average adjusted net income divided by the two-year average shareholders' equity for the period then ending. Please see " 2014 Equity-Based Compensation 2014 Equity Awards How is ROE calculated and defined?" for the definition of "Adjusted net income." Based on the company's ROE relative to the Peer Group, which was in the 62nd percentile, the Maximum Target reflected in the table above was achieved and this portion of the cash bonus pool was 146% funded.
How were the relative ROE goals for 2014 determined?
Given the competitive insurance and reinsurance marketplace, the Compensation Committee believed that the target goal would be challenging yet obtainable, and that the goal would neither sacrifice management's discipline in its efforts to grow the business nor promote short-term gain over long-term shareholder returns. The threshold and maximum goals were selected based on typical ranges used by the Peer Group to ensure that the company's cash bonus program remained competitive.
Why is there a non-formulaic (i.e., corporate scorecard) element to the Annual Bonus Pool funding formula?
The non-formulaic portion of the award is intended to take into account other quantitative and qualitative financial, operational and strategic measures to allow the Compensation Committee to assess the company's performance in ways that may not manifest in near-term financial performance. In 2014, non-formulaic measures included financial metrics, product innovation, international expansion, staff development and internal efficiency.
For 2014, highlights of some of the non-formulaic objectives and related achievements noted in determining this portion of the annual cash bonus pool funding included:
-62-
Based on these achievements and other considerations, the Compensation Committee funded the non-formulaic component of the annual cash bonus pool at 125%, which resulted in the annual cash bonus pool being funded at 157% of the Target column. Once the Compensation Committee determined the overall cash bonus pool funding level, awards to individual officers then were made based on the CEO's assessments of individual performance. The annual cash bonus earned for 2014 by each of the NEOs as a percentage of his salary and as a percentage of target bonus was as follows:
Name |
Bonus as a Percentage of Base Salary |
Bonus as a Percentage of Target |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | |
Scott A. Carmilani |
|
188% | |
157% | |||
Thomas A. Bradley |
171% |
171% |
|||||
Wesley D. Dupont |
|
171% | |
171% | |||
Frank N. D'Orazio |
165% |
165% |
|||||
Louis P. Iglesias |
|
158% | |
158% |
2014 Equity-Based Compensation
The Compensation Committee believes that a substantial portion of each NEO's compensation should be in the form of long-term, equity-based awards, the largest portion of which should be "at risk" awards with vesting dependent on the company achieving certain performance targets. Equity-based grants have generally been awarded as a combination of performance-based equity awards and time-vested RSUs. Each year, the Compensation Committee sets a mix between the various equity-based vehicles to ensure that a substantial portion of the awards to each NEO is comprised of performance-based awards. The value of each NEO's individual awards is based on an assessment of each individual's performance for the prior year, contribution to the business, experience level and external market information.
Equity-based awards serve to better align the interests of the NEOs and our shareholders. Equity-based awards also help to ensure a strong connection between NEO compensation and our financial performance because the value of the award depends on our future performance and share price. Long-term, equity-based awards, meaning awards that vest over a period of years, also serve as a management retention tool. The Compensation Committee utilizes equity-based awards to accomplish its compensation objectives while recognizing its duty to the company's shareholders to limit diluting their holdings in the company. Each year, the Compensation Committee reviews analyses from its compensation consultant on relevant factors of its equity compensation program, including the competitiveness of equity awards by position, overall share usage, burn rates and comparisons to the equity compensation programs of the Peer Group.
-63-
2014 Equity Awards. In February 2014, the Compensation Committee set the mix among performance-based equity awards and time-vested RSU awards at approximately 75% and 25%, respectively. No stock options were granted to any employees.
The total number of performance-based equity awards available for grant each year is determined by the Board based upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee. In making its recommendation to the Board, the Compensation Committee may consider the number of available shares remaining under the company's equity plans, the number of employees who will be eligible to receive such awards, market data from competitors with regard to the percentage of outstanding shares made available for annual grants to employees and the need to retain and motivate key employees.
Performance-based equity awards were granted to our NEOs in February 2014 under the 2012 Omnibus Plan of which 40% will be eligible to settle in common shares and 60% will be eligible to settle in cash. Awards issued in 2014 will vest after the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016 in accordance with the terms and performance conditions set forth in the Performance-Based Award Agreement under the 2012 Omnibus Plan and as described in more detail below. These performance-based awards are "at risk," meaning should the company fail to perform at the minimum prescribed level, no performance-based awards will vest and no compensation will be paid to the NEOs from these awards. The Compensation Committee believes that performance-based equity awards serve to promote the company's growth and profitability over the long term. By having a three-year vesting period, these awards also encourage sustainable performance and employee retention.
The company granted the following performance-based equity awards to the NEOs in 2014:
Name |
Target Awards |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | |
Scott A. Carmilani |
|
128,799 | ||
Thomas A. Bradley |
22,206 |
|||
Wesley D. Dupont |
|
22,206 | ||
Frank N. D'Orazio |
17,766 |
|||
Louis P. Iglesias |
|
18,876 |
The methodology by which these grants will be earned is shown in the table below:
|
Adjusted Book Value on a CAGR Basis |
Adjusted ROE Relative to the Peer Group |
|||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Book Value Growth (%) |
|
Number of Shares Earned (% of Target) |
|
Percentile |
|
Number of Shares Earned (% of Target) |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weight |
|
| |
50% | |
| |
|
| |
50% | |
| ||||||||
Maximum |
³ 15% |
150% |
³ 75th |
150% |
|||||||||||||||||
Target |
|
9% | |
| |
100% | |
|
50th | |
| |
100% | ||||||||
Threshold |
3% |
50% |
25th |
20% |
|||||||||||||||||
Below Threshold |
|
< 3% | |
| |
0 | |
|
< 25th | |
| |
0 |
Why use Book Value as a 20142016 financial metric?
Based on consultations with Farient and senior management, the Compensation Committee decided to continue to utilize growth in "book value" as one of the financial metrics for the 2014 grant of performance-based equity awards because this metric strongly correlates with long-term shareholder
-64-
value and the long-term health of the company. Book value growth of the common shares will be measured on a CAGR basis.
How is Book Value calculated?
For purposes of the performance-based equity awards, "book value" is defined as "total shareholders' equity" adjusted for (1) any special, one-time dividends declared; and (2) any capital events (such as capital contributions or share repurchases). In addition to the two factors above, the Compensation Committee may consider in its discretion any other extraordinary events that may affect the computation.
Why use ROE relative to the Peer Group as a 20142016 financial metric?
The Compensation Committee also approved using the company's ROE relative to the Peer Group as another financial metric. ROE relative to the Peer Group was included as a component of the financial metric for the 2014 grant of performance-based equity awards as this metric correlates with long-term shareholder value. ROE is also a common measure used in the industry and, as a measurement of return, complements our growth measure, book value growth, by emphasizing profitable growth.
How is ROE calculated and defined?
For purposes of the performance-based equity awards, "ROE" is defined as the three-year average adjusted net income divided by the four-year average shareholders' equity for the period then ending. "Adjusted net income" is defined as "net income" adjusted for (1) unrealized gains and losses on investments within "other comprehensive income"; (2) the portion of other-than-temporary impairment losses on investments recognized within "other comprehensive income"; and (3) any reclassification adjustment for net realized gains and losses on investments included in "net income", each net of applicable income tax.
How were the Adjusted Book Value Growth and Relative ROE target goals for 20142016 determined?
Goals for the 20142016 performance-based awards were chosen by the Compensation Committee based on a comprehensive competitive analysis of performance, the company's long-term plans and a competitive review of the calibration of pay to performance.
20122014 Performance-Based Equity Awards. The performance period for the performance-based equity awards issued under the company's Third Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Stock Incentive Plan") in 2012 ended as of December 31, 2014. These awards vested based on: (1) a book value growth on a CAGR basis of 11.7%, which exceeded the 9% target category established by the Compensation Committee at the grant date; and (2) ROE relative to the company's Peer Group in 2012, which exceeded the maximum goal established by the Compensation Committee at the grant date. These awards vested at 136% of targeted shares, with 346,515 shares earned in the aggregate by recipients.
2014 Time-Vested RSU Awards. A time-vested RSU gives a holder the right to receive a specified number of common shares at no cost (or, in the company's sole discretion, an equivalent cash amount) if the holder remains employed at the company through the applicable vesting date. Because time-vested RSUs do not have a performance component (unlike our performance-based equity awards), they will generally have value in the future. We believe these awards encourage employee retention. We have historically settled RSUs in common shares and/or cash equal to the "fair market
-65-
value" of the common shares on the applicable vesting date. Fair market value is defined as the daily volume-weighted average sales price of the common shares for the five consecutive trading days up to and including the applicable vesting date. While the bulk of the company's RSU awards to NEOs have historically been made pursuant to our annual grant program, the Compensation Committee retains the discretion to recommend to our Board additional awards at other times. The company also grants RSUs as part of its equity-based compensation package to its employees, including the NEOs.
The company granted the following RSU awards to the NEOs in 2014:
Name |
2014 Time-Vested RSUs |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
| | |