form10ksba.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
Washington, D.C. 20549
__________________________________
 
FORM 10-KSB/A
(AMENDMENT NO. 2 )
 
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) 
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006

Commission file number: 001-16237
__________________________________
 
AIRTRAX, INC.
(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
 
New Jersey
22-3506376
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
 
08012
(Address of principal
executive offices)
(Zip Code)
__________________________________
 
Issuer’s telephone number, including area code: (856) 232-3000
 
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, no par value.
 
Check whether the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. ¨
 
Check whether the issuer filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ¨ No  T
 
Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of the issuer’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. ¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No T
 
The issuer’s revenues for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 were $1,346,913.
 
The aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the issuer as of April 12, 2007 was $13,301,732.
 
The number of shares outstanding of the issuer’s Common Stock as of April 12, 2007 was 24,376,887 shares.
 
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: NONE

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes ¨ No T


 

 

EXPLANATORY NOTE
 
In conjunction with our independent registered public accounting firm and professional advisors, we conducted an analysis of our various financial instruments and agreements involving convertible debt and common stock financings accompanied by warrants, with a particular focus on the accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 133”), the Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF Issue No. 00-19, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock (“EITF 00-19”), and FASB Staff Position No. EITF 00-19-2, “Accounting for Registration Payment Arrangements” (“EITF 00-19-2”), (collectively, the “Derivative Accounting Pronouncements”). Accordingly, certain accounting policies we previously considered to reflect what was deemed to be appropriate at the time when the financings were previously reported, have been modified by recent interpretations, including the Derivative Accounting Pronouncements.

On November 2, 2007, as a result of this analysis, we noted that our previously filed financial statements in the annual reports for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 filed on Form 10-KSB, together with the quarterly reports on Form 10-QSB for the quarters ending March 31, 2005, June 30, 2005, September 30, 2005, March 31, 2006, June 30, 2006, September 30, 2006, March 31, 2007, June 30, 2007 and September 30, 2007 (collectively, the “Reports”) could no longer be relied upon.  We sent a formal letter request to the Office of the Chief Accountant (OCA) of the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) dated December 17, 2007, petitioning the OCA to waive the requirement to file separate amended and restated Reports for the periods noted above, and instead file a comprehensive amended and restated comparative Form 10-KSB for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, along with certain comprehensive financial information and disclosures for 2004, and comprehensive amended and restated comparative Form 10-QSBs for the periods ended March 31, 2007, June 30, 2007, and September 30, 2007 along with certain comprehensive financial information and disclosures for 2005. This waiver was granted by the OCA on December 27, 2007.
 
This restatement is required to properly reflect our financial results for certain non-cash, and non-operational related charges or credits to earnings associated with both embedded and freestanding derivative liabilities, and the accounting for certain derivatives under the control of the issuer due to the revised interpretation and implementation of the Derivative Accounting Pronouncements.
 
Under EITF 00-19, warrants are considered free-standing instruments in that they are legally detachable and separately exercisable. The conversion benefits, which are embedded in these debt issues, derive value from the relationship between the stock price and debt conversion price, and are considered embedded derivatives under the provisions of SFAS 133. The fair values of both the warrants and conversion benefits are calculated using a Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, taking into consideration factors such as the underlying price of the common stock, the exercise price for warrants or the conversion price for the conversion benefit, the stock volatility, and the risk-free interest rates available for comparable time periods.
 
Free-standing instruments (warrants), and embedded derivatives (conversion benefits) which are initially bifurcated or separated from the host financial instrument, are recorded as separate liabilities, in cases where the security holder has a right to choose to receive a “net settlement” of cash. The identification of such net settlement provisions for prior convertible debt issuances with warrants resulted in us concluding that such securities should have been identified as “derivatives”, and therefore warrant liabilities must be recorded as separate derivative liability accounts on our restated balance sheet, and marked to market for each subsequent reporting period with any non-cash charges or credits attributed to the revised fair value of the liability being recognized through earnings (after the reversal of previously incorrectly recorded charges and/or credits to earnings).
 
If the decision to settle the outstanding liability remains with us, the value of the warrants should be recorded in an equity account. The identification of the settlement provisions we controlled under certain debt issuances resulted in us determining that the warrants should be reflected in the restated financial statements as components of equity, as compared to having been previously recorded as liabilities with non-cash charges and/or credits to earnings as a result of being marked to market for each period presented.
 
2


 
 EITF 00-19-2 specifies that the contingent obligations to make future payments or otherwise transfer consideration under a registration payment arrangement, whether issued as a separate agreement or included as a provision of a financial instrument or other agreement, should be separately recognized and measured in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.” FSP No. EITF 00-19-2 also requires additional disclosure regarding the nature of any registration payment arrangements, alternative settlement methods, the maximum potential amount of consideration and the current carrying amount of the liability, if any. This EITF is effective January 1,2007 and will be adopted by the us.
 
We also previously sold stock units, which included warrants along with common stock. In these cases, a portion of the proceeds equal to the value of the warrants is allocated to the warrants, with the balance allocated to the stock. In such cases where a net settlement provision for cash exists, the values of the warrants are treated as liabilities, and the balance is revalued at the end of each reporting period with any change in value being recognized currently as a non-cash charge and/or credit to earnings. When a warrant classified as a liability is exercised or cancelled, the fair value of the warrant, as determined at the time of exercise or cancellation, is transferred to equity, and is no longer revalued. A similar adjustment is made for a conversion benefit classified as a liability when the debt is converted to stock, or cancelled.
 
For the convenience of the reader, this Form 10-KSB/A sets forth the original Form 10-KSB in its entirety. However, this Form 10-KSB/A only amends our financial statements and the footnotes to our financial statements, along with the corresponding changes to our Management’s Discussion and Analysis. We also corrected typographical errors and have revised our controls and procedures disclosure as a result of these restatements. No other information in the original Form 10-KSB is amended hereby. In addition, pursuant to the rules of the SEC, Item 13 of Part III to the filing has been amended to contain currently dated certifications from our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as required by Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The certifications of our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer are attached to this Form 10KSB/A as Exhibits 31.1, 31.2, 32.1 and 32.2, respectively.



 
3

 

AIRTRAX, INC.
 
2006 FORM 10-KSB/ A ANNUAL REPORT
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
Page
 
PART I
   
Item 1.  Description of Business
5
Item 2.  Description of Property
13
Item 3.  Legal Proceedings
13
Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
13
PART II
   
Item 5.  Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.
14
Item 6.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation.
18
Item 7.  Financial Statements.
32
Item 8.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
33
Item 8A.  Controls and Procedures.
33
Item 8B.   Other Information
33
PART III
   
Item 9.   Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons: Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
34
Item 10.   Executive Compensation
36
Item 11.   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholders
39
Item 12.   Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
40
Item 13.  Exhibits
41
Item 14.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
44
 

 
4

 

PART I
  
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION
 
Various statements in this Form 10-KSB and in future filings by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in our press releases and in oral statements made by or with the approval of authorized personnel constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and are indicated by words or phrases such as "anticipate," "could," "currently envision," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "project," "seeks," "we believe," and similar words or phrases and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements.
 
These forward-looking statements are based largely on our expectations and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. Actual results could differ materially from these forward-looking statements as a result of the facts described in "Risk Factors." We undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks and uncertainties, we cannot assure you that the forward-looking information contained in this Form 10-KSB will, in fact, transpire.
 
Our fiscal year ends on December 31. References to a fiscal year refer to the calendar year in which such fiscal year ends.
 
Item 1.      Description of Business 
 
Corporate Information and History 
 
We were incorporated in the State of New Jersey on April 17, 1997. On May 19, 1997, we entered into a merger agreement with a predecessor company that was incorporated on May 10, 1995. We were the surviving company in the merger.
 
Effective November 5, 1999, we merged with MAS Acquisition IX Corp ("MAS"), and were the surviving company in the merger. Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended, each share of common stock of MAS was converted to 0.00674 shares of our company. After giving effect to fractional and other reductions, MAS shareholders received 57,280 of our shares as a result of the merger.
 
In March 2004, we reached an agreement in principal, subject to certain closing conditions, with Fil Filipov to acquire 51% of the capital stock of Filco GmbH, a German corporation. In October 2004, Mr. Filipov and we agreed to modify our agreement in principal so as to increase the number of shares of the capital stock of Filco GmbH, which we could acquire, if we had finalized the acquisition, from 51% to 75.1%. Through December 31, 2005, we had loaned Filco GmbH an aggregate principal amount of $6,275,881 with no loans made by us in 2006, exclusive of interest at 8% per annum, pursuant to a series of secured promissory notes. Security for these loans consisted of Filco's plant machinery, equipment and other plant property, and intellectual property, including designs and drawings. We used proceeds from the private placement offerings that we completed during 2004 and 2005 to fund the Filco loans.

On January 20, 2006, Filco filed for insolvency in Germany. As a result of the filing by Filco, we terminated the Acquisition Agreement on February 7, 2006. An auction sale of Filco’s assets occurred on May 10, 2006. Due to the uncertainty of our position under German bankruptcy law, $4,275,881 of the Filco advances was written off in 2005, and the remaining $2,000,000 was written off in 2006. Accordingly, any inventory, equipment or outstanding advances to Filco have been written off during 2006 and there is no indication that the proceeds of any inventory or equipment at the Filco plant will be returned to us.
 
In connection with the Acquisition Agreement, Mr. Filipov was to receive options to purchase 900,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.01. We did not issue such options because the Acquisition Agreement was terminated and we believe that the conditions for such issuance were never fulfilled. Mr. Filipov has indicated to us that he believes that the conditions were fulfilled and that we owe him the options. We and Mr. Filipov are endeavoring to reach a mutually acceptable settlement.
 
5

 
Introduction
 
Our principal executive offices are located at 200 Freeway Drive, Unit One, Blackwood, NJ 08012 and our telephone number is (856) 232-3000. We are incorporated in the State of New Jersey.
 
Since 1995, substantially all of our resources and operations have been directed towards the development of the Omni-Directional wheel, related components, Omni-Directional Lift Trucks and other Omni-Directional Vehicles. Many of the components, including the unique shaped wheels, motors, and frames, have been designed by Airtrax and are specially manufactured for us.
 
Omni-Directional means that vehicles designed and built by us can travel in any direction. Our Omni-directional vehicles are controlled with a joystick. The vehicle will travel in the direction the joystick is pushed. If the operator pushes the joystick sideways, the vehicle will travel sideways. If the operator were to twist the joystick the vehicle will travel in circles. Our omni-directional vehicles have one motor and one motor controller for each wheel. The omni-directional movement is caused by coordinating the speed and direction of each motor with joystick inputs which are routed to a micro-processor, then from the micro-processor to the motor controllers and finally to the motor itself.
 
During the year ended December 31, 2006, we continued development of the COBRA and KING COBRA scissor lifts and the Omni-Directional power chair. We anticipate incurring more costs on these products and plan to begin production of the first COBRA model and the KING COBRA in 2007. The growth and development of our business will require a significant amount of additional working capital. We currently have limited financial resources and based on our current operating plan, we will need to raise additional capital in order to continue operations. However, we are in discussions with lenders to raise capital in order to continue operating, although we have no contracts or commitments for additional capital at this time. We currently do not have adequate cash to meet our short or long term objectives. In the event additional capital is raised, it may have a dilutive effect on our existing stockholders. However, there can be no assurance that additional financing will be available at terms that are suitable to us.
 
The assembly of our products is conducted at our executive offices. Currently 100% of our vehicle frames are being manufactured in the USA. These frames are shipped to the Blackwood plant for final assembly. Previously, partially assembled vehicles were shipped to the Blackwood facility from the Filco plant in Germany. Fourteen were shipped to the USA for final assembly. A total of approximately sixty frames were shipped from Bulgaria to the Filco plant for partial assembly. None of the frames shipped from Bulgaria were within specification. The twenty-seven frames shipped to the United States required re-machining in order to make them useable. The balance were rejected and abandoned with other parts inventory that was stored in the Filco plant.

 
6

 
 
OMNI-DIRECTIONAL TECHNOLOGY
 
Prior History
 
Omni directional vehicle technology has been the subject of research and development by universities, the Department of Defense, and industry for over 25 years. A Swedish inventor patented an early stage omni-directional wheel. Thereafter, the technology was purchased by the United States Navy and was advanced at the Naval Surface Warfare Center. The US Navy held the patent until its expiration in 1990. In 1996, the Navy transferred this technology to us for commercialization through a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA).
 
Technology Description
 
Since the technology transfer under the CRADA agreement, we have examined and redesigned many aspects of the system for use in various applications including lift trucks and other material handling equipment. In this regard, we refined control software and hardware, and tested a variety of drive component features on our pilot Omni-Directional lift trucks, scissor-lifts, and multi-purpose mobility platforms. Extensive demonstrations of prototype vehicles for commercial and military users in combination with market research have enabled us to direct our development efforts towards the products offering the best probability of success in the market.
 
Our engineers have designed other aspects of our machine to complement the unique functionality of our Omni-Directional technology. In so doing, we achieved a virtually maintenance free drive system which allows the vehicle free and unrestricted movement during operation. Each vehicle is powered with electric motors that eliminate brushes and commutators of conventional DC motors. The motors also are lubricated for life thereby eliminating the need for additional greasing and fittings. The ATX-3000 transmission uses a synthetic lubricant, and is sealed for life. The joysticks control all vehicle movement. Conventional drive trains, steering racks, hydraulic valve levers, and foot petals for braking and acceleration are all non-existent.
 
On vehicles employing our Omni-Directional Technology, each wheel powered wheel has a separate electric motor, making the vehicle capable of traveling in any direction. The motion of the vehicle is controlled by coordinating all powered wheels through a microprocessor that receives input from an operator-controlled joystick(s). The joystick(s) control all vehicle movement (starting, steering, and stopping). The frame of our ATX-3000 Omni-Directional Lift Truck consists of a steel main frame and attached articulating axle, mobilized with four Omni-Directional wheels. The AC electric motor for each wheel turns its own wheel hub. Each wheel hub is encircled with multiple specially shaped rollers that are offset 45 degrees. By independently controlling the forward or rearward rotation of each wheel, the vehicle has the capability of traveling in any direction. The technology allows the vehicle to move forward, laterally, diagonally, or completely rotate within its own footprint, thereby allowing it to move into confined spaces without difficulty. The navigational options of an Omni-Directional vehicle are virtually limitless.
 
EXISTING AND PROPOSED PRODUCTS
 
SIDEWINDER Omni-Directional Lift Trucks. We anticipate that we will add additional models of lift trucks to the SIDEWINDER line, including a Reach truck and an Order Picker truck.
 
Omni-Directional Aerial Work Platform. In late February 2004, we, in collaboration with MEC Aerial Platform Sales Corporation of Fresno, California ("MEC"), introduced a concept version of a scissor lift at the American Rental Association trade show in Atlanta. The scissor lift called the "PHOENIX(TM)", incorporated our Omni-Directional technology along with an MEC platform and lift mechanisms.
 
7

 
On March 13, 2004, we entered into a draft Product Development, Sales and Representation Agreement with MEC. The draft agreement called for the joint development of a proto-type and production versions of an Omni-Directional aerial work platform called the "3068ODS". During the development stage, each party was to provide the parts, which apply to that party's area of responsibility. We would provide all of the parts required for the Omni-Directional traction system and related control systems, and MEC would provide all of the parts required for the scissor lift and lifting apparatus and the control systems for the scissor lift apparatus. After development of the prototype version, the parties were to establish the cost of a commercial product, and if the cost of a commercial product was considered commercially viable, the parties would jointly develop a commercial version of the aerial work platform. If commercial production resulted, we would have been responsible for product manufacturing, and MEC or its affiliate would have been responsible to promote, market and sell the product to their network of approximately 200 distributors. Aerial work platform sales made by MEC would be subject to a royalty to us and, likewise sales made by us would be subject to a royalty to MEC. The amount of the respective royalties would be subject to agreement by the parties. Orders placed by MEC would be financed by MEC subject to agreed production schedules. We also planned to manufacture the COBRA(TM) AWP using the lifting mechanism as designed by us or procured from MEC and vendors other than MEC.
 
During 2004, MEC was repositioned to perform manufacturing in the United States thus removing their obligation under the agreement. During the latter part of 2004, we presented MEC with invoices for payment of tooling and engineering costs related to development of the PHOENIX(TM). The invoices were not paid by MEC who was, at that time, in the process of realigning their finances. As a result of the aforementioned changes, the agreement was modified. The modification stated that the 3068ODS aerial work platform project would be products of our company instead of an MEC designed or built vehicle. This meant that the project would be henceforth designed and built by us. MEC would still have the ability to make suggestions regarding vehicle design or construction, but the final product would be our product. In addition, the agreement was revised to provide that we would build another vehicle product line, the COBRA, which will be marketed exclusively by our dealers. The parties mutually agreed to the dissolution of the agreement and Airtrax has decided to design, build and market the AWP’s under the COBRA brand exclusively. Discussions with MEC regarding ways that they can make Omni-Directional AWP’s available to their customers are on going.
 
Omni-Directional Personal Mobility Devices. We have begun the development of new technologies which will enable us in the future, to develop Omni-Directional Personal Mobility Devices such as Power Chairs, Scooters, and patient beds or lifts. We have had discussions with several equipment manufacturers who may be interested in developing and marketing such products using these technologies. No agreements have been made. We will require additional funds to complete structural and ergonomic designs and proto-type vehicles, for further evaluation and testing. We cannot predict whether we will be able to successfully develop these products.
 
Military Products. During 1999, we were awarded a Phase I research contract under the Department of Defense's Small Business Innovation Research program (SBIR) to develop an Omni-Directional Multiple Purpose Mobility Platform (MP2). Under the Phase I base contract, we studied the application of the omni-directional technology for military use and were supervised by the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division (NAWC-AD) in Lakehurst, New Jersey. The contemplated use includes the installation of jet engines on military aircraft and the transportation of munitions and other military goods. We completed the Phase I base contract in 1999 and were subsequently awarded a Phase I option from NAWC-AD to further define the uses of the MP2. In July 2000, we were awarded a Phase II research contract under the SBIR program. Under the Phase II contract, we studied the feasibility of the MP2 for military purposes, and constructed two proto-type devices. This contract (with the option) was extended twice for 6 months each past the 42-month contract time period. A completed proto-type MP2 was delivered to the US Navy during the end of the first quarter of 2004 for testing purposes. A second design, an Omni-Directional Jet Engine Handler conversion kit was constructed, and demonstrated as proof of concept of the modularity of the design. We have been advised by the US Navy that a non-SBIR sponsor for the MP2 program must be identified before a Phase II option is exercised. A Phase III contract could be awarded without such a sponsor. Although our management believes the underlying Omni-Directional Technology for the proposed MP2 has significant potential for both commercial and military applications, we cannot predict whether any sales beyond the Phase II contract will result from the SBIR program. It is the belief of management that sales to the US military for products such as the MP2 will not materialize until the Omni-Directional Technology achieves commercial acceptance. We do believe, however, that products such as the ATX-3000 or the COBRA AWP can and will be sold to the US government, possibly including the military, through a GSA Multiple Awards Contract. We have begun the application process and hope it will be awarded by mid-2007. We cannot predict whether we will be successful in our application.
 
8

 
On September 7, 2006, we were awarded a $415,000 contract to design and build a customized MP2 Equipment Handling Unit for the Israeli Air Force. The contract includes an option to build 5 additional units at $95,000 each upon the acceptance of the first unit. It is estimated that the follow on orders that could result from this contract would be from 29 to 100 units over the next one to three years. The Critical Design Review was completed in November 2006, the design was approved and initial deliverables were provided. As a result, we received a first process payment of $170,000 on December 12, 2006. We expect to begin the Acceptance Test Procedure in mid-April 2007 and upon successful completion, will receive a second payment of $162,000. We cannot predict whether we will be able to successfully pass all of the acceptance tests and complete the contract, or that if we do so, that any subsequent orders will result.
 
CURRENT OPERATIONS
 
Since 1995, substantially all of our resources and operations have been directed towards the development of the Omni-Directional wheel, related components, Omni-Directional Lift Trucks and other Omni-Directional Vehicles. Many of the components, including the unique shaped wheels, motors, and frames, have been designed by Airtrax and are specially manufactured for us. 29 ATX-3000 Omni-Directional lift trucks, carrying ANSI certification and the UL Label, have been shipped to customers in 2006, and nine others are ready to ship pending receipt of orders in the beginning of 2007.
 
ANSI testing refers to a series of tests including tilt testing the vehicle with masts it will use to make certain that it will not tip over in normal use. In addition, ANSI testing includes drop testing specified loads on the overhead guard to make certain that the overhead guard will not fail and crush the operator. These tests require us to turn the vehicle on its side to prove that the battery door lock will retain the battery in the event the vehicle is overturned. ANSI testing was performed and documented by us and we have certified that the tests have been completed and the vehicle has passed in all respects. This testing was required prior to the vehicle being sold to the public in the United States.
 
UL testing is completed on lift trucks to certify that is free of hazards with respect to fire and electrical shock. Completion of UL testing is generally considered the mark of companies who will take extra steps and precautions to protect their customers.
 

 
9

 

MANUFACTURING AND SUPPLIERS
 
There was limited production in the second through fourth quarters of 2006. All of the units shipped in 2006 and our current inventory were assembled in the last quarter of 2005 and the first quarter 2006. Our General Manager for plant production, a former plant manager for GM, has established the production assembly process and procedure for our vehicle assembly. His efforts have helped to develop procedures, and to incorporate inventory control and quality assurance programs so that we stand ready to rapidly scale production capacity at the Blackwood facility. Initially this plant was equipped for nominal monthly production but is capable of ramping up for anticipated demand before year's end. We also plan to manufacture the KING COBRA Omni-Directional AWP in the Blackwood plant beginning in the third quarter of 2007.

Components for our products consist of over the counter products and proprietary products that have been specially designed and manufactured by various suppliers in collaboration with us. We believe that continual refinements of certain components will occur during the first six months of initial KING COBRA production in response to user feedback and additional product testing. We will strive to improve product functionality, which may require additional refinements in the future. We consider the specially designed and manufactured products proprietary, and have entered into exclusive contractual agreements with certain suppliers to protect the proprietary nature of these products. These arrangements prohibit the supplier from producing the same or similar products for other companies who would want to compete directly with us in the omni-directional vehicle market. In addition, while we maintain single sources for some of the over the counter components, we are engaged in qualifying and securing agreements with second sources for all possible components
 
DISTRIBUTION AND PRODUCT MARKETING
 
We intend to establish a national and international network of distributors and dealers to sell our SIDEWINDER and COBRA lines to users, however, we may sell directly to select national and international accounts and retailers. National and international accounts or retailers include, but are not limited to, nationally recognized businesses with national or international locations having facilities in numerous states or countries.
 
During 2004 and 2005, in anticipation of commercial production, we solicited interest from targeted dealers nationwide, and in certain instances, received contracts from a number of these dealers. Due to the delay in establishing commercial production, the contracts were not fulfilled. In 2004, we began soliciting dealers nationwide and distributors in several foreign countries. Principal terms of the agreement reached is that these dealers will purchase our products which include the SIDEWINDER or the COBRA AWP (scissor lift), or both and sell these products to their clients. Certain of the distributors were given "exclusive" territories, such as Airtrax Canada (Airtrax Canada is not owned or operated by us but we have authorized their use of the Airtrax Name). Airtrax Canada was required to purchase a minimum number of SIDEWINDER units to maintain the "exclusivity" portion of the agreement between firms. Airtrax Canada lost their exclusivity in 2006, as they did not meet the minimum requirements of the agreement. Presently, we are unable to distribute quantities of vehicles in Europe due to our inability to be certified compliant (“CE”) with Europe. We expect to be CE compliant and able to distribute vehicles in 2007, although no assurances can be given. The dealers in the US generally have not been given exclusive territorial rights, but that has occurred in some areas. They are required to purchase one or more vehicles, however, to become a dealer. Credit terms are now available to approved dealers while foreign distributors are only sold under the terms of letters of credit. All foreign sales are paid in advance, under terms of an irrevocable letter of credit or approved credit terms. Targeted dealers for the SIDEWINDER brand will consist of selected premier equipment dealers, currently selling other lift truck products. The dealer network will consist of dealers who have substantial market share in the US, with a history of being able to sell and repair lift trucks and/or related material handling solutions. Several of the targeted dealers are significant sized entities, having annual sales in excess of $100 million. We expect to provide a sales incentive to dealers through an aggressive pricing structure. Typically, a dealer will earn a commission ranging from $500 to $1,000 on the sale of a competitive lift truck. Our pricing structure will enable the dealer to receive much higher commissions from the sale of the SIDEWINDER products.
 
10

 
We also intend to use trade shows and print and television media to advertise and promote our Omni-Directional products. Print media will include advertisements in national and international publications such as web based ads, major material handling equipment magazines, and direct mailings to targeted distributors and end-users. Heavy equipment is rarely, if at all, advertised on television. However, we believe that television will provide an effective media for our product, due to its unique attributes. We believe that due to the current economic conditions, we will be able to capitalize on favorable advertising pricing. We also expect to be an exhibitor at industry trade shows from time to time, including the bi-annual ProMat show located in Chicago, Illinois.
 
Product Warranty Policies
 
Our product warranty policy is similar to the warranty policies of other major manufacturers, i.e., one-year warranties on all parts and labor, and two years on major parts, however, our vehicles have fewer parts to warranty. In addition, manufacturers of our parts and vehicles have their own warranty policies that, in effect, take the financial exposure from our company. There are exceptions to the one year rule, such as the frame and significantly, the motors and controllers. These parts have an eighteen-month warranty, because the coverage begins when the product is shipped to us and not when the product is purchased.
 
MARKETS
 
Lift Trucks
 
Our initial market focus was directed to the lift truck market. We believe that commercial versions of Omni-Directional Lift Trucks will improve the materials handling and warehousing industries creating potential markets globally. Industry data shows that during 2003 approximately 174,000 and 550,000 units were sold in the United States and worldwide, respectively (Modern Materials Handling). Based upon an average per unit sale price of $28,500 (Modern Materials Handling estimate), the total market in the United States would approximate $5 billion in 2003. This amount represents sales of a broad range of vehicles with price ranges from $18,000 to $31,000 for a standard 3,000-pound rated vehicle to $75,000 or greater for specialty narrow aisle or side loader vehicles. We expect to continue to make inroads into this market with the introduction of additional SIDEWINDER brand material handling vehicles in the future.
 
Aerial Work Platforms
 
Aerial Work Platforms are used in the construction and warehousing industries, and are ideally suited for our Omni-Directional Technology. According to data provided by the United States Department of Commerce, this market consists of approximately $1.2 billion in annual sales. Aerial Work Platforms and man lifts range in size from single user lifts to large off road machines. Of the total market, we expect to compete with a range of indoor man lifts. Great strides were made in our development of our AWP products during 2006, and we now plan to introduce two models under the COBRA brand in 2007, and additional units in 2008.


 
11

 

COMPETITION
 
We expect to confront competition from existing products, such as standard and "Narrow Aisle or NA" lift trucks, and from competing technologies. Competition with standard lift trucks, which retail from $16,000 to $31,000, will be on the basis of utility, price, and reliability. We believe that we will compete favorably with a standard lift truck for reliability, and that a purchase decision will be based upon weighing the operational advantages of our products against its higher purchase price. NA and sideloader lift trucks retail at $45,000 or greater. While our SIDEWINDER Omni-Directional Lift Truck cannot be classified as "narrow aisle", it can perform "narrow aisle" functions at a significantly less cost. We also are aware of multi-directional lift trucks now being offered by other manufacturers that retail from $42,000 and higher for the standard version. These newer products have improved operational features, however, they are unable to travel in all directions, and hence are not omni-directional. These machines have to stop, turn all four wheels, and then proceed to drive in the sideward direction. Despite these improved operational features, management believes these manufacturers have adhered to older conventional methods and have added a substantial amount of parts to their lift trucks to achieve improved functionality, which contrasts with the design and features of our product as discussed previously herein. Therefore, to that extent, we believe that we maintain a competitive advantage to these newer products.
 
We recognize that many of these manufacturers are subsidiaries of major national and international equipment companies, and have significantly greater financial, engineering, marketing, distribution, and other resources than us. In addition, the patent on the first omni-directional wheels expired in 1990. Although we have received patent protection for certain aspects of our advanced technology, no assurances can be given that such patent protection will effectively thwart competition.
 
PATENTS AND PROPRIETARY RIGHTS
 
In December 1997, we were awarded a patent for an omni-directional helicopter ground-handling device. On January 22, 2002, we received US patent #6,340,065 relating to our low vibrations wheels. On May 28, 2002, we received US patent #6,394,203 encompassing certain aspects of the omni-directional wheel with some features specific to the lift truck, and in April 15, 2003 we received US patent #6,394,203 relating to methods for designing low-vibration wheels. We also have several patent applications pending relating to other aspects of our technology. We expect to make future patent applications relating to various other aspects of our omni-directional technology. We also have filed a patent application for our hybrid power module concepts. At this time, no foreign patents have been issued for any of our technology.
 
On September 8, 2003, we entered an exclusive license agreement with Excalibur Design Services, Inc. and Nicholas Fenelli (Inventor), to secure and use certain proprietary intellectual properties known collectively as “Omni-Directional Vehicle Control Algorithms”. Mr. Fenelli is also our Chief Operating Officer.  Due to severe cash flow restrictions in 2006, we were unable to fulfill our obligations under the terms of the agreement and Excalibur rescinded the exclusivity portion of the agreement. As of December 31, 2006, no other party was granted rights to use the property. On February 19, 2007, we negotiated an amendment with Excalibur to reinstate our exclusive rights to the “Omni-Directional Vehicle Control Algorithms”. We expect to resolve all issues to the mutual benefit of the two companies during 2007.
 
We also seek to protect our proprietary technology through exclusive supply contracts with manufacturers for specially designed and manufactured components.
 

 
12

 

PRODUCT LIABILITY
 
Due to nature of our business, we may face claims for product liability resulting from the use or operation of our lift trucks or other products.

Presently, we maintain product liability insurance in the amount of $1 million. We anticipate increasing this amount $10 million in the future, as we deem necessary to do so. We obtained our insurance commensurate with the initial shipment of our Omni-Directional Lift Trucks.
 
EMPLOYEES
 
As of March 31, 2007, we have 13 full time employees, and one contract employee, and engage consultants from time to time. We have no collective bargaining agreements with our employees and believe our relations with our employees are good.
 
Item 2.      Description of Property
 
We maintain our administrative offices and assembly facilities at 200 Freeway Drive, Unit One, Blackwood, NJ 08012. This facility is a total of 30,000 square feet with 3,000 square feet allocated to offices, and cost a monthly rental fee of $12,750.

Item 3.      Legal Proceedings
 
We are not currently a party to any legal proceedings. There has been no bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings.

Item 4.      Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
 
No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.


 
13

 

PART II
 
Item 5.      Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.
 
 
Our common stock has been traded on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol "AITX". The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing prices per share of the common stock as reported on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board. These quotations reflect prices between dealers, do not include retail mark-ups, markdowns, and commissions and may not necessarily represent actual transactions. The prices are adjusted to reflect all stock splits.
 

   
$High
 
$Low
2007 First Quarter
   
0.97
 
0.48 
           
2006 First Quarter
   
2.39
 
1.08
Second Quarter
   
2.17
 
1.15
Third Quarter
   
2.03
 
0.92
Fourth Quarter
   
1.01
 
0.42
           
2005 First Quarter
   
3.07
 
1.83
Second Quarter
   
2.95
 
1.85
Third Quarter
   
4.70
 
2.07
Fourth Quarter
   
3.40
 
2.20
 
Common Stock

Our Amended Articles of Incorporation authorize the issuance of 100,000,000 shares of common stock, no par value per share. Holders of shares of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share on all matters to be voted on by the stockholders. Holders of common stock have cumulative voting rights. Holders of shares of common stock are entitled to share ratably in dividends, if any, as may be declared, from time to time by the Board of Directors in its discretion, from funds legally available therefore. In the event of a liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of our company, the holders of shares of common stock are entitled to share pro rata all assets remaining after payment in full of all liabilities. Holders of common stock have no preemptive or other subscription rights, and there are no conversion rights or redemption or sinking fund provisions with respect to such shares.
 
As of April 12, 2007, there were 24,379,887 shares of common stock outstanding.
 
As of April 12, 2007, there were approximately 878 stockholders of record of our common stock, respectively. This does not reflect those shares held beneficially or those shares held in "street" name.
 
Dividend Policy

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends to stockholders in the foreseeable future. In addition, any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of the board of directors and will be dependent upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, and such other factors as the Board of Directors deem relevant. There are no restrictions in our articles of incorporation or bylaws that restrict us from declaring dividends on our common stock.
 
14

 
Preferred Stock
 
As of April 12, 2007, there were 275,000 shares of Preferred stock outstanding. We held a special meeting of our shareholders on March 28, 2005 pursuant to which a majority of our shareholders approved an amendment to our certificate of incorporation to increase our authorized preferred stock from 500,000 to 5,000,000 shares. Accordingly, we are authorized to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. In addition, pursuant to said meeting, a majority of our shareholders approved an amendment to our certificate of incorporation to provide that the shares of preferred stock may be issued in series, and shall have such voting powers, full or limited, or no voting powers, and such designations, preferences and relative participating, optional or other special rights, and qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, as shall be stated and expressed in the resolution or resolutions providing for the issuance of such stock adopted from time to time by the board of directors. Accordingly, our board of directors is expressly vested with the authority to determine and fix in the resolution or resolutions providing for the issuances of preferred stock the voting powers, designations, preferences and rights, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, of each such series to the full extent now or hereafter permitted by the laws of the State of New Jersey.
 
The holders of the preferred stock are entitled to receive, when, as, and if declared by our board of directors, out of funds legally available therefore, cash dividends on each share of preferred stock at the rate of 5% per annum, or if cash is not legally available, in additional shares of common stock. The preferred stock, in respect of dividends and distributions upon our liquidation, winding-up, and dissolution, shall rank senior to all classes of our common stock and each other class of capital stock or series of preferred stock created that does not expressly provide that it ranks senior to, or on a parity with, the preferred stock. The holders of preferred stock are entitled to cast 10 votes for each share held of the preferred Stock on all matters presented to our shareholders for shareholder vote.
 
On April 1, 2005, we issued 100,000 shares of preferred stock to the sole holder of the preferred stock as payment of dividends in lieu of cash dividends with respect to previously issued shares of preferred stock. Our original Articles of Incorporation, as amended, including on April 30, 2000, do not support the issuance of additional shares of preferred stock as payment of dividends on shares of issued and outstanding preferred stock. Accordingly, the 100,000 shares of preferred stock which were issued to the holder on April 1, 2005, were issued in error.
 
Our Articles of Incorporation, as amended, including on April 30, 2000, similarly do not support the calculation we used in determining the number of shares of common stock used to pay preferred stock dividends. The difference being the date used in determining the stock price at the end of each preferred dividend period, as opposed to the lowest common stock price during the preferred dividend period, subject to a 70% discount, for calculating the number of common shares issued as payment of the period’s preferred stock dividend. Accordingly, the number of shares was greater than the number of shares required, and were issued in error.
 
Our financial statements at December 31, 2004 reflect 275,000 shares of preferred stock outstanding and disclosed that an additional 100,000 shares of preferred stock were deemed the equivalent of 221,892 shares of common stock that would have been required to settle an equivalent amount of preferred dividends. We have determined that the number of shares deemed the equivalent of the preferred stock dividend has been recalculated based on our Articles of Incorporation, as amended, including on April 30, 2000. Accordingly, we will issue 136,041 shares of common stock to the sole holder of the preferred stock as payment of $51,561 of preferred stock dividends less other adjustments resulting from the recalculation of the number of common shares required to pay preferred stock dividends, subsequently approved. During the period January 1, 2003 through June 30, 2006, 200,238 shares of common stock were issued in excess of the amount required.
 
15

 
Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table shows information with respect to each equity compensation plan under which our common stock is authorized for issuance as of December 31, 2006.
 
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

Plan category
 
Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
 
Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
 
Number of securities
remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)
 
   
(a)
 
(b)
 
(c)
 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
 
-0-
 
-0-
   
-0-
 
                   
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
 
-0-
 
-0-
   
-0-
 
                   
Total
 
-0-
 
-0-
   
-0-
 

Currently, we do not have a formalized equity compensation plan under which our common stock is authorized for issuance.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
 
Following is a summary of unregistered securities issued during the fourth quarter of 2006.

 
194,000 shares of common stock were issued for professional services valued at $141,919.

 
184,000 shares of common stock were issued in connection with a settlement of a default on a convertible promissory note. These shares were valued at $93,490.

 
41,666shares of common stock were issued in exchange of a $65,000 of convertible note.

 
5,000 shares were issued as an Employee bonus valued at $3,570.

 
All of the above offerings and sales were deemed to be exempt under rule 506 of Regulation D and Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. No advertising or general solicitation was employed in offering the securities. The offerings and sales were made to a limited number of persons, all of whom were accredited investors, business associates of Airtrax or executive officers of Airtrax, and transfer was restricted by Airtrax in accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. In addition to representations by the above-referenced persons, we have made independent determinations that all of the above-referenced persons were accredited or sophisticated investors, and that they were capable of analyzing the merits and risks of their investment, and that they understood the speculative nature of their investment. Furthermore, all of the above-referenced persons were provided with access to our Securities and Exchange Commission filings.


 
16

 

Item 6.      MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATIONS 
 
Special Note on Forward-Looking Statements. Certain statements in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation” below, and elsewhere in this annual report, are not related to historical results, and are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements present our expectations or forecasts of future events. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements frequently are accompanied by such words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue,” or the negative of such terms or other words and terms of similar meaning. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance, achievements, or timeliness of such results. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of such forward-looking statements. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this annual report. Subsequent written and oral forward looking statements attributable to us or to persons acting in our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements and risk factors set forth below and elsewhere in this annual report, and in other reports filed by us with the SEC.
 
You should read the following description of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with the financial statements and accompanying notes included in this report beginning on page F-1.
 
Overview
  
Since 1995, substantially all of our resources and operations have been directed towards the development of the Omni-Directional wheel, related components, Omni-Directional Lift Trucks and other Omni-Directional Vehicles. Many of the components, including the unique shaped wheels, motors, and frames, have been designed by Airtrax and are specially manufactured for us.
 
Omni-Directional means that vehicles designed and built by us can travel in any direction. Our Omni-directional vehicles are controlled with a joystick. The vehicle will travel in the direction the joystick is pushed. If the operator pushes the joystick sideways, the vehicle will travel sideways. If the operator were to twist the joystick the vehicle will travel in circles. Our omni-directional vehicles have one motor and one motor controller for each wheel. The omni-directional movement is caused by coordinating the speed and direction of each motor with joystick inputs which are routed to a micro-processor, then from the micro-processor to the motor controllers and finally to the motor itself.
 
During the year ended December 31, 2006, we continued development of the COBRA and KING COBRA scissor lifts and the Omni-Directional power chair. We anticipate incurring more costs on these products and plan to begin production of the first COBRA and the KING COBRA models in 2007. The growth and development of our business will require a significant amount of additional working capital. We currently have limited financial resources and based on our current operating plan, we will need to raise additional capital in order to continue operations. However, we are in discussions with lenders to raise capital in order to continue operating. We currently do not have adequate cash to meet our short or long term objectives. In the event additional capital is raised, it may have a dilutive effect on our existing stockholders. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available at terms that are suitable to us.
 
17

 
We have incurred losses and experienced negative operating cash flow since our inception. For the twelve month period ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, we had net losses attributable to common shareholders of approximately $6.2 million and $ 11.6 million, respectively. The net loss in both periods includes amortization of debt discount and financing costs of $900,000 and $2.5 million in 2006 and 2005, respectively, offset by revaluation income $1.4 million and $68,000 in 2006 and 2005, respectively, in connection with the repricing of the conversion benefits of convertible debenture issues and of warrant conversion prices. We also wrote down the advances to Filco of $4.7 million and $2 million in 2006 and 2005, respectively. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses. Our operating expenses have been and are expected to continue to outpace revenue and result in additional losses in the near term. We may never be able to reduce these losses, which will require us to seek additional debt or equity financing. While we are in discussions with several prospective lenders, we do not currently have commitments for these funds and there can be no assurance that additional financing will be available, or if available, will be on acceptable terms. 
 
Restatement
 
In conjunction with our independent registered public accounting firm and professional advisors, we conducted an analysis of our various financial instruments and agreements involving convertible debt and common stock financings accompanied by warrants, with a particular focus on the accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 133”), the Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF Issue No. 00-19, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock (“EITF 00-19”), and FASB Staff Position No. EITF 00-19-2, “Accounting for Registration Payment Arrangements” (“EITF 00-19-2”), (collectively, the “Derivative Accounting Pronouncements”). Accordingly, certain accounting policies we previously considered to reflect what was deemed to be appropriate at the time when the financings were previously reported, have been modified by recent interpretations, including the Derivative Accounting Pronouncements.
 
On November 2, 2007, as a result of this analysis, we noted that our previously filed financial statements in the annual reports for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 filed on Form 10-KSB, together with the quarterly reports on Form 10-QSB for the quarters ending March 31, 2005, June 30, 2005, September 30, 2005, March 31, 2006, June 30, 2006, September 30, 2006, March 31, 2007, June 30, 2007 and September 30, 2007 (collectively, the “Reports”) could no longer be relied upon.  We sent a formal letter request to the Office of the Chief Accountant (OCA) of the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) dated December 17, 2007, petitioning the OCA to waive the requirement to file separate amended and restated Reports for the periods noted above, and instead file a comprehensive amended and restated comparative Form 10-KSB for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, along with certain comprehensive financial information and disclosures for 2004, and comprehensive amended and restated comparative Form 10-QSBs for the periods ended March 31, 2007, June 30, 2007, and September 30, 2007 along with certain comprehensive financial information and disclosures for 2005. This waiver was granted by the OCA on December 27, 2007.
 
This restatement is required to properly reflect our financial results for certain non-cash, and non-operational related charges or credits to earnings associated with both embedded and freestanding derivative liabilities, and the accounting for certain derivatives under the control of the issuer due to the revised interpretation and implementation of the Derivative Accounting Pronouncements.


 
18

 

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2006 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2005

Liquidity constraints and limited access to additional capital for production in 2004 and 2005 and the unexpected death of our Chief Executive Officer and President, Peter Amico in August 2006 have limited production and sales of omni-directional technology. Consequently, management believes that the year-to-year comparisons described below are not indicative of future year-to-year comparative results.

In September 2006, Airtrax was awarded a $415,000 contract to design and build a customized MP2 Equipment Handling Unit for the Israeli Air Force. The contract includes an option to build five additional units at $95,000 each upon the acceptance of the first unit. It is estimated that the follow on orders that could result from this contract would be from 29 to 100 units over the next one to three years. The Critical Design Review was completed in November 2006, the design was approved and initial deliverables were provided. As a result, we received a first process payment of $170,000 on December 12 2006. We expect to begin the Acceptance Test Procedure in mid April 2007 and upon successful completion, will receive a second payment of $162,000. We cannot predict whether we will be able to successfully pass all of the acceptance tests and complete the contract, or that if we do so, that any subsequent orders will result.

We believe that the joint cooperation between us and the United States Navy with the MP2 contract, including building the ETU-110 omni-directional engine handler and our contract to design and build a customized MP2 Equipment Handling Unit for the Israeli Air Force, has bolstered the potential use of our technology within the military. We do not intend to incur additional costs with the US Navy unless we incur potential expenses in demonstrating the ETU-110 omni-directional engine handler, or other omni-directional vehicles in connection with the Israeli contract.
 
Revenue

Revenue for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2006 was approximately $1.3 million, representing an increase of approximately $600,000 from revenue of $719,000 for the comparable period in 2005. This increase in revenue, is primarily, attributed to sales of our SIDEWINDER ATX-3000.
 
Cost of Goods Sold
 
Our cost of goods sold for the twelve month period months ended December 31, 2006 amounted to approximately $1.5 million, an increase of approximately $800,000 from $729,000 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2005. This increase in cost of goods sold, is primarily, attributed to sales of our SIDEWINDER ATX-3000.
 
Operating and Administrative Expenses
 
Operating and administrative expenses which include administrative salaries, depreciation and other expenses for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2006 totaled $5.9 million which represents a decrease of approximately $3.5 million from $9.4 million incurred in the twelve month period ended December 31, 2005. The decrease is primarily due to recording of stock option expenses of $1.1 million in 2005, compared to $76,000 in 2006, partially offset by additional expenses relating to the increase in production of our SIDEWINDER ATX-3000 and Cobra and King Cobra scissor lift and Omni-Directional Power Chair development costs.

Operating expenses also include a $2.0 million impairment charge for the Filco advances which were completely written off in 2006, compared to the $4.7 million charged in 2005.
 
19

 
Other Income and Expense
 
Other income and expenses, net, for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2006 totaled ($225,000) which includes amortization charges for deferred financing fees ($251,000), amortized discounts against certain debt issuances in connection with conversion privileges ($649,000), liquidated damages for settlement of debt covenants ($214,000) and settlement expenses in connection with debt issuances ($290,000), offset by an increase in revaluation income of $1.4 million for warrant and conversion privileges being revalued at the end of the reporting period. During the twelve month period ended December 31, 2005, we recorded other income and expenses of ($2.8 million) which included charges for deferred financing fees ($773,000), amortized discounts against certain debt issuances in connection with conversion privileges ($1..8 million), and settlement expenses of ($281,000), partially offset by revaluation income of $68,000.
 
Loss Attributable to Common Shareholders
 
Loss attributable to common shareholders for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006 was approximately $(6.2) million compared with a loss of $(11.6) million for the same period in 2005. The decrease is in part to the recording of stock option expenses of approximately $1.1 million in 2005, compared with $76,000 in the current period, and other income and expenses (net) in the twelve months ended December 31, 2005 of approximately $2.8 million compared with $225,000 in 2006. Additionally, we recorded revaluation income of $1.4 million in 2006 compared with $68,000 in 2005 in connection with the repricing of warrant and conversion privileges of convertible debenture issues and of warrant conversion prices. We also wrote down the remaining Filco advance of $2.0 million during 2006, compared with an impairment of $4.7 million in 2005, along with approximately $300,000 of deemed dividend expense in each year.

Research and Development

We incurred $519,134 and $544,933 in research and development expenses during the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Research and development activities during fiscal 2005 primarily involved continued testing and evaluation of omni-directional components and preparing these components for production in 2005. Our wheel design was changed from the "concept" to "production" phase. This was and is an ongoing process between our Company and a vendor’s engineers to insure manufacturability. The motors and controllers were designed and/or changed in design in order to meet ANSI (American National Standards Institute) and UL (Underwriters Laboratories) testing requirements. Danaher and we revised the algorithms used in the motor controllers as well the microprocessor that runs the machines. Research and development activities also included further changes to existing designs and new designs that were patented or for those patents with pending applications. Portions of the costs we incurred due to testing and research and development were charged to the US Navy contract as provided therein.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
Since our inception, we have financed our operations through the private placement of our common stock and sales of convertible debt. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, we raised net of offering costs approximately $1.3 million and $5.9 million, respectively, from the private placement of our securities.
 
During 2000, we were approved by the State of New Jersey for our technology tax transfer program pursuant to which we could sell our net operating losses and research and development credits as calculated under state law. In the years 2006 and 2005, we recorded credits of $493,258 and $867,413, respectively, from the sale of our losses and credits.
 
20

 
We have consistently demonstrated our ability to meet our cash requirements through private placements of our common stock and convertible notes. We have continued to similarly satisfy those requirements during the twelve months ended December 31, 2006. However, there can be no assurances that we will be successful in raising the required capital to continue our current operating plan.
 
We anticipate that our cash requirements for the foreseeable future will be significant. In particular, management expects substantial expenditures for inventory, product production, and advertising with production of its Omni-Directional lift truck and the start of Cobra and King Cobra (Scissors-Lift) production.

We will require additional funds to continue our operations beyond the initial production run. We anticipate that operating capital in the amount of approximately $3 to 5 million will be required during the next 12 months to sufficiently fund operations. We expect to recognize lower per unit manufacturing and part costs in the future due to volume discounts, as well as lower per unit shipping costs as we transition from the initial rate to larger-scale production. While we are in discussions with several prospective lenders, we do not currently have commitments for additional funds and there can be no assurance that additional financing will be available, or if available, will be on acceptable terms. If we are unable to obtain sufficient funds during the next six months we will further reduce the size of our organization and may be forced to reduce and/or curtail our production and operations, all of which could have a material adverse impact on our business prospects.

As a result of our liquidity issues, we have experienced delays in the repayment of certain promissory notes upon maturity and payments to vendors and others. If in the future, the holders of our promissory notes may demand repayment of principal and accrued interest instead of electing to extend the due date and if we are unable to repay our debt when due because of our liquidity issues, we may be forced to refinance these notes on terms less favorable to us than the existing notes, seek protection under the federal bankruptcy laws or be forced into an involuntary bankruptcy filing.
 
As of December 31, 2006, our working capital deficit was $1,225,143. Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation were $283,920, and total assets, as of December 31, 2006, were $3,017,404. Current liabilities as of December 31, 2006 were $3,676,558 compared with total liabilities of $4,208,100.
 
As of December 31, 2005, our working capital was $299,940. Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation was $190,893, and total assets, as of December 31, 2005 were $5,489,101. Current liabilities as of December 31, 2005 were $2,959,663 compared with total liabilities of $4,298,188.
 
As of January 1, 2005, our working capital deficit was $572,184. Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation were $93,587, and total assets, as of December 31, 2005 were $4,600,023. Current and total liabilities as of December 31, 2004 were $2,291,153.

 
February 2007 Financing

On February 20, 2007, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain accredited and/or qualified institutional investors pursuant to which we sold an aggregate of $3,734,040 principal amount secured convertible debentures convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion price equal to $0.45 for an aggregate purchase price of $3,219,000. In addition, we issued to the investors (i) warrants to purchase 8,297,866 shares of our common stock at an exercise price equal to $0.54 per share, which represents 100% of the number of shares issuable upon conversion of the debentures; (ii) callable warrants to purchase 4,148,933 shares of our common stock at an exercise price equal to $0.75 per share, which represents 50% of the number of shares issuable upon conversion of the debentures; and (iii) callable warrants to purchase 4,148,933 shares of our common stock at an exercise price equal to $1.25 per share, which represents 50% of the number of shares issuable upon conversion of the debentures.
 
21


 
The debentures mature on February 20, 2009. We may in our discretion redeem the debentures, subject to certain equity conditions being met by us as set forth in the debentures, at a price equal to 150% of the principal balance, accrued interest, and all liquidated damages, if any, thereon that are requested to be redeemed. Our obligations under the securities purchase agreement, the debentures and the additional definitive agreements with respect to this transaction are secured by all of our assets. In addition, our wholly owned subsidiaries, Airtrax Financial Services LLC and Airtrax Manufacturing Corp., which are non-operating entities,  are guaranteeing the satisfaction of our obligations under the Securities Purchase Agreement , the debentures and the additional definitive agreements with respect to this transaction.
 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We do not have any off balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenue, results of operations, liquidity or capital expenditures.
 
Liquidated Damages
 
In connection with financings we entered into with various investors in November 2004 and October 2005, we provided such investors registration rights. Pursuant to those registration rights, in the event that we did not file a registration statement by a certain date registering for resale shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of their securities or have such registration statement effective by another date, we agreed to pay to such investors liquidated damages. To date, we have not filed such registration statement, and as a result, we have accrued the required obligation for liquidated damages.
 
During 2006, we issued  to the investors in the November 2004 financing, an aggregate principal amount of $198,248  in our 4% Unsecured Convertible Debentures and 5 year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 72,201 shares of our common stock in exchange for the settlement of $244,632 in accrued liquidated damages through June 30, 2006. The debentures mature on March 1, 2008, and September 30, 2008, respectively, pay simple interest at a rate of 4% per annum and are convertible into shares of our common stock at a price equal to $ 1.56 per share. The warrants are exercisable into shares of our common stock at a price equal to $ 1.75 per share. In addition, the investors agreed to forego any future accrual and payment of such liquidated damages.
 
In July 2006 we issued 2% Unsecured Convertible Debentures to the investors in the October 2005 financing, aggregating $359,549 and Stock Purchase Warrants to acquire 110,808 shares of our common stock at $ 1.56 per share, in full settlement of liquidated damages resulting from our not filing a registration statement by a certain date registering for resale shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of their securities. The conversion price of the shares underlying the note was $ 1.75 .  In addition, the investors agreed to forego any future accrual and payment of such liquidated damages.
 
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
 
Intangibles
 
We incurred costs to acquire certain patent rights. These costs are capitalized and are being amortized over a period of fifteen years on a straight line basis.
 
We continually evaluate whether events and changes in circumstances warrant revised estimates of useful lives or recognition of an impairment loss of our intangibles, which as of December 31, 2006, consisted mainly of patents and licensing agreements. The conditions that would trigger an impairment assessment of our intangible assets include a significant, sustained negative trend in our operating results or cash flows, a decrease in demand for our products, a change in the competitive environment and other industry and economic factors.
 
22

 
Deferred Financing Costs
 
Deferred financing costs represent legal, commitment; processing, consulting, and other fees associated with the issuance of our debt. Deferred financing costs are being amortized over the term of the related debt.
 
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
 
Pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets”, we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of long-lived assets may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized when expected cash flows are less than the asset's carrying value. Accordingly, when indicators of impairment are present, we evaluate the carrying value of such assets in relation to the operating performance and future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying assets. Our policy is to record an impairment loss when it is determined that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Impairment charges of $2,000,000 were recorded for the year ended December 31, 2006, while impairment charges of $4,700,839 were recorded for the year ended December 31, 2005 related to the write down of the Filco advances .
 
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimated.
 
Revenue Recognition
 
Revenue on product sales is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, such as when a purchase order or contract is received from the customer, the price is fixed, title to the goods has changed and there is a reasonable assurance of collection of the sales proceeds. We obtain written purchase authorizations from customers for a specified amount of product at a specified price and consider delivery to have occurred at the time of shipment. Revenue is recognized at shipment, and where the following criteria are met; persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred; the sales price is fixed or determinable; and collectability is reasonably assured.
 
Revenue from services is recognized when the service is performed, and where the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; the contract price is fixed or determinable; and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue from research and development activities relating to firm fixed-price contracts is generally recognized as billing occurs. Revenue from research and development activities relating to cost-plus-fee contracts include costs incurred plus a portion of estimated fees or profits based on the relationship of costs incurred to total estimated costs. Contract costs include all direct material and labor costs and an allocation of allowable indirect costs as defined by each contract, as periodically adjusted to reflect revised agreed upon rates. These rates are subject to audit by the other party. Amounts can be billed on a bi-monthly basis. Billing is based on subjective cost investment factors.
 
23

 
Accounting for Income Taxes
 
As part of the process of preparing our financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes. This process involves estimating our actual current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences may result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheet. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income. If there is not persuasive evidence that recovery will occur, we would establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or increase this allowance in a period, the value of the benefit of the tax deferral is reduced or eliminated.
 
Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. We have recorded a valuation allowance of $8,257,629 as of December 31, 2006, due to uncertainties related to our ability to utilize some of our deferred tax assets, primarily consisting of certain net operating losses carried forward before they expire and certain accrued expenses, which are deferred for income tax purposes until paid. The valuation allowance is based on our estimates of taxable income and the period over which our deferred tax assets will be recoverable. The net deferred tax asset as of December 31, 2006 was $ 919,889, net of the valuation allowance.
Accounting for Derivatives
 
Our issuances of convertible debt were accompanied by other financial instruments. These financial instruments include warrants to purchase stock, and the right to convert debt to stock at specified rates (“conversion benefits”). Pursuant to SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended (SFAS 133), and EITF Issue No. 00-19, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, A Company’s Own Stock (EITF 00-19), we have identified certain embedded and freestanding derivative instruments. Generally, where the ability to physical or “net-share” settle an embedded conversion option or free standing financial instrument is not deemed to be within our control, the embedded conversion option is required to be bifurcated or separated, and both the freestanding instruments and bifurcated conversion feature are accounted for as derivative liabilities. At each reporting date, we estimate the fair values of all derivatives, and changes in the fair value are reported in the statement of operations.
 
Under EITF 00-19, warrants are considered free-standing instruments in that they are legally detachable and separately exercisable. The conversion benefits, which are embedded in these debt issues, derive value from the relationship between the stock price and debt conversion price, and are considered embedded derivatives under the provisions of SFAS 133. The fair values of both the warrants and conversion benefits are calculated using a Black -Scholes Model, taking into consideration factors such as the underlying price of the common stock, the exercise price for warrants or the conversion price for the conversion benefit, the stock volatility, and the risk-free interest rates available for comparable time periods.
 
Free-standing instruments (warrants), and embedded derivatives (conversion benefits) which are initially bifurcated or separated from the host financial instrument, are recorded as separate liabilities, in cases where the security holder has a right to choose to receive a “net settlement” of cash. The identification of such net settlement provisions in one such prior convertible debt issuance with warrants resulted in us concluding that such warrants should have been identified as “derivatives”. Therefore, the warrant liability related to this issuance must be recorded as a derivative liability on our restated balance sheet, and marked to market for each subsequent reporting period with any non-cash charges or credits attributed to the revised fair value of the liability being recognized through the statement of operations.
 
24

 
If the decision to settle an outstanding liability remains with us, the value of the warrants is recorded in an equity account. The identification of settlement provisions being controlled by us under certain debt issuances resulted in us determining that the securities should be reflected in the restated financial statements as components of equity, as compared to having been previously recorded as liabilities with non-cash charges and/or credits to operations as a result of being marked to market for each period presented. As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, we recognized and recorded the value of certain warrants as equity of $2,315,935 and $2,051,118, respectively, in the accompanying financials.
 
EITF 00-19-2 specifies that the contingent obligations to make future payments or otherwise transfer consideration under a registration payment arrangement, whether issued as a separate agreement, or included as a provision of a financial instrument or other agreement, should be separately recognized and measured in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies” (SFAS 5). EITF 00-19-2 also requires additional disclosure regarding the nature of any registration payment arrangements, alternative settlement methods, the maximum potential amount of consideration and the current carrying amount of the liability, if any. We adopted the provisions of EITF 00-19-2 for the reporting period beginning January 1, 2007.
 
We also previously sold stock units which included warrants along with common stock. In these cases, a portion of the proceeds equal to the value of the warrants is allocated to the warrants with the balance allocated to the stock. In such cases, the values of the warrants are treated as liabilities or equity, depending on whether the issuance documents contain “net cash settlement” provisions. For those warrants that are treated as liabilities, the liabilities are revalued at the end of each reporting period with any change in value being recognized currently as a non-cash charge and/or credit to operations. When a warrant classified as a liability is exercised or canceled, the fair value of the warrant, as determined at the time of exercise or cancellation, is transferred to equity and is no longer revalued. A similar adjustment is made for a conversion benefit classified as a liability when the debt is converted to stock, or canceled.
 
For embedded and free standing derivatives valued as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, we have recognized in the statement of operations, revaluation income of $1,412,143 and $68,481, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005. In addition, we recognized a derivative liability in the accompanying balance sheet for conversion benefits and warrants of $236,144 in 2006 and $1,620,683 in 2005.
 
To the extent that the initial fair values of the bifurcated and/or freestanding derivative liabilities exceed the net proceeds received, an immediate charge to the statement of operations is recognized for the excess. The remainder of the discount from the face value of the convertible debt resulting from allocating part or all of the proceeds to the derivative liabilities is amortized over the life of the instrument through periodic charges to the statements of operations, using the straight line method, which was the most systematic and rational approach that approximated the interest method of amortization due to the short two year amortization term of the debt.
 
Stock Based Compensation
 
Common Stock for Services
 
Because of the significant liquidity issues we have faced since our inception, we have issued common stock to third party vendors and others in return for product, services, and as dividends on the preferred stock. These issuances are assigned values equal to the value of the common stock on the earlier of the dates of issuance or the date on which a commitment is made to provide compensation in the form of equity securities, whichever date is earlier. Such issuances are recorded as expenses in the periods in which the stock is issued, unless the right to the stock has not fully vested, in which case the expense is recorded in the periods of vesting. During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, we issued an aggregate of 871,257 and 330,895 shares, respectively, of common stock representing a value of services of $1,197,826 and $836,500, respectively, to third parties in exchange for services performed.
25

 
Warrants
 
We have issued warrants both as part of “stock units”, and as an integral part of convertible note issues. The value of the warrants and conversion options which are classified as liabilities are revalued each reporting period. These values are determined by a Black-Scholes Model. Most of these issuances contain Registration Payment Arrangements (RPAs), which impose liquidated damages under certain circumstances. EITF 00-19-2 specifies the accounting treatment for derivatives that contain RPA’s and provides guidance on accounting for potential obligations of the RPA’s. The accounting treatment of derivatives will not change as a result of EITF 00-19-2 as the “RPAs” were not the sole determining factor in prior decisions about derivative classification. Each of these warrants is exercisable over five year periods from dates of issuance at prices ranging from $0.45-$1.56 per share.   See Note 4 - Capitalization for additional information.

Recent Accounting Pronouncement

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has recently issued FASB Staff Position EITF 00-19-2 which modifies the accounting treatment of derivatives that flow from financings involving embedded derivatives. This Staff Position is effective for financial statements for periods beginning January 1, 2007. Management believes that this will cause some change in the way we account for derivatives. Management is evaluating this position and has not made a determination as to the effective it will have on our financial statements.
 
The Company has reviewed other accounting pronouncements issued during 2006, and has concluded that they will have no effect on our financials statements.
 
RISK FACTORS

In addition to other information contained in this Form 10-KSB, the following Risk Factors should be considered when evaluating the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-KSB:
 
RISKS RELATED TO OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION AND BUSINESS
 
WE MAY NEVER BECOME PROFITABLE AND CONTINUE AS A GOING CONCERN BECAUSE WE HAVE HAD LOSSES SINCE OUR INCEPTION.
 
We may never become profitable because we have incurred losses and experienced negative operating cash flow since our formation. For our fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, we had a net loss attributable to common stockholders of approximately $ 6.2 million and $ 11.7 million, respectively. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses. Our operating expenses have been and are expected to continue to outpace revenues and result in significant losses in the near term. We anticipate that our cash requirements to fund operating or investing cash requirements over the next 12 months will be greater than our current cash on hand. We may never be able to reduce these losses, which will require us to seek additional debt or equity financing. We do not currently have commitments for additional funds and there can be no assurance that additional financing will be available, or if available, will be on acceptable terms. If we are unable to obtain sufficient funds during the next 12 months we will further reduce the size of our organization and may be forced to reduce and/or curtail our production and operations, all of which could have a material adverse impact on our business prospects.
 
26

 
OUR BUSINESS OPERATIONS WILL BE HARMED IF WE ARE UNABLE TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL FUNDING.
 
Our business operations will be harmed if we are unable to obtain additional funding. We do not know if additional financing will be available when needed, or if it is available, if it will be available on acceptable terms. Insufficient funds may prevent us from implementing our business strategy or may require us to delay, scale back or eliminate certain opportunities for the provision of our technology and products.
 
THE PRICING POLICY FOR OUR LIFT TRUCKS MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE, AND ACTUAL SALES OR OPERATING MARGINS MAY BE LESS THAN PROJECTED.
 
We are assessing present and projected component pricing in order to establish a pricing policy for the SIDEWINDER Lift Truck. We have not finalized our assessment as current prices for certain lift truck components reflect special development charges, which are expected to be reduced as order volume for such components increase and as manufacturing efficiencies improve. We intend to price our lift trucks so as to maximize sales yet provide sufficient operating margins. Given the uniqueness of our product, we have not yet established final pricing sensitivity in the market. Consequently, the pricing policy for its lift trucks may be subject to change, and actual sales or operating margins may be less than projected.
 
WE HAVE RECEIVED LIMITED INDICATIONS OF THE COMMERCIAL ACCEPTABILITY OF OUR OMNI-DIRECTIONAL LIFT TRUCK. ACCORDINGLY, WE CANNOT PREDICT WHETHER OUR OMNI-DIRECTIONAL PRODUCTS CAN BE MARKETED AND SOLD IN A COMMERCIAL MANNER.
 
Our success will be dependent upon our ability to sell Omni-Directional products in quantities sufficient to yield profitable results. To date, we have received limited indications of the commercial acceptability of our Omni-Directional lift truck. Accordingly, we cannot predict whether the Omni-Directional product can be marketed and sold in a commercial manner.
 
WE CANNOT ASSURE THAT WE WILL HAVE IN PLACE PATENT PROTECTION AND CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENTS FOR OUR PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGY. IF WE DO NOT ADEQUATELY PROTECT OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, THERE IS A RISK THAT THEY WILL BE INFRINGED UPON OR THAT OUR TECHNOLOGY INFRINGES UPON ONE OF OUR COMPETITOR'S PATENTS. AS A RESULT, WE MAY EXPERIENCE A LOSS OF REVENUE AND OUR OPERATIONS MAY BE MATERIALLY HARMED.
 
Our success will be dependent, in part, upon the protection of our proprietary Omni-Directional technology from competitive use. A form of our Omni-Directional technology was originally patented in 1973 and was sold to the US Navy. We secured a transfer of this technology from the Navy in 1996 under the terms of a CRADA agreement (Cooperative Research and Development Agreement) and we have worked since that time to commercialize Omni-Directional products. We received 3 patents regarding the "redesign" of the wheel. In addition, we have a license agreements for the algorithms used to control vehicular movement, and a patent for this technology has been applied for. Further, we have applied for patents for a movable operator's control station and a munitions handler. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we believe our lack of patent protection is a material competitive risk. Our competitors could reverse engineer our technology to build similar products. Also, certain variations to the technology could be made whereby our competitors may use the technology without infringing upon our intellectual property.
 
27

 
The patent for the Omni-Directional wheel expired in 1990. We, however, have received patent protection of certain other aspects of its Omni-Directional wheel, and for features specific to our lift truck. In addition to the patent applications, we rely on a combination of trade secrets, nondisclosure agreements and other contractual provisions to protect our intellectual property rights. Nevertheless, these measures may be inadequate to safeguard our underlying technology. If these measures do not protect the intellectual property rights, third parties could use our technology, and our ability to compete in the market would be reduced significantly. In addition, if the sale of our product extends to foreign countries, we may not be able to effectively protect its intellectual property rights in such foreign countries.
 
In the future, we may be required to protect or enforce our patents and patent rights through patent litigation against third parties, such as infringement suits or interference proceedings. These lawsuits could be expensive, take significant time, and could divert management's attention from other business concerns. These actions could put our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly, and any patent applications at risk of not issuing. In defense of any such action, these third parties may assert claims against us. We cannot provide any assurance that we will have sufficient funds to vigorously prosecute any patent litigation, that we will prevail in any of these suits, or that the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, will be commercially valuable. During the course of these suits, there may be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions and other interim proceedings or developments in the litigation. If securities analysts or investors perceive any of these results to be negative, it could cause the price of our common stock to decline.
 
WE CURRENTLY LACK ESTABLISHED DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS FOR OUR LIFT TRUCK PRODUCT LINE.
 
We do not have an established channel of distribution for our lift truck product line. We have initiated efforts to establish a network of designated dealers throughout the United States. Although we have received indications of interest from a number of equipment distributors, to date, such indications have been limited. We cannot predict whether we will be successful in establishing our intended dealer network.

IF WE ARE UNABLE TO RETAIN THE SERVICES OF ROBERT WATSON, OUR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, OR IF WE ARE UNABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY RECRUIT, QUALIFIED PERSONNEL, WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO CONTINUE OPERATIONS.
 
Our ability to successfully conduct our business affairs will be dependent upon the capabilities and business acumen of current management including Robert Watson, our President and Chief Executive Officer. We have entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Watson; however, we do not maintain key man life insurance with respect to Mr. Watson. Accordingly, shareholders must be willing to entrust all aspects of our business affairs to our current management. Further, the loss of any one of our management team could have a material adverse impact on our continued operation.
 
OUR INDUSTRY AND PRODUCTS ARE CONSIDERED TO BE HIGH-RISK WITH A HIGH INCIDENCE OF SERIES PERSONAL INJURY OR PROPERTY LOSS WHICH COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE IMPACT ON OUR BUSINESS.
 
The manufacture, sale and use of Omni-Directional lift trucks and other mobility or material handling equipment is generally considered to be an industry of a high risk with a high incidence of serious personal injury or property loss. In addition, although we intend to provide on-site safety demonstrations, the unique, sideways movement of the lift truck may heighten potential safety risks. Despite the fact that we intend to maintain sufficient liability insurance for the manufacture and use of our products, one or more incidents of personal injury or property loss resulting from the operation of our products could have a material adverse impact on our business.
 
28

 
IF WE DO NOT SUCCESSFULLY DISTINGUISH AND COMMERCIALIZE OUR DEVELOPED PROPRIETARY PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, WE WILL NOT ATTRACT A SUFFICIENT NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS. ACCORDINGLY, WE MAY BE UNABLE TO COMPETE SUCCESSFULLY WITH OUR COMPETITORS OR TO GENERATE REVENUE SIGNIFICANT TO SUSTAIN OUR OPERATIONS.
 
Although management believes our product will have significant competitive advantages to conventional lift trucks, we are competing in an industry populated by some of the foremost equipment and vehicle manufacturers in the world. All of these companies have greater financial, engineering and other resources than us. No assurances can be given that any advances or developments made by such companies will not supersede the competitive advantages of our Omni-Directional lift truck. In addition, many of our competitors have long-standing arrangements with equipment distributors and carry one or more of competitive products in addition to lift trucks. These distributors are prospective dealers for our company. It therefore is conceivable that some distributors may be loath to enter into any relationships with us for fear of jeopardizing existing relationships with one or more competitors.
 
RISKS RELATING TO OUR COMMON STOCK
 
WE HAVE ISSUED COMMON STOCK, WARRANTS, AND CONVERTIBLE NOTES TO INVESTORS AND IN EXCHANGE FOR FEES AND SERVICES AT A DISCOUNT TO THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK AT THE TIME OF SUCH ISSUANCE. THIS RESULTS IN A LARGE NUMBER OF SHARES WHICH HAVE BEEN ISSUED AND A LARGE NUMBER OF SHARES UNDERLYING OUR WARRANTS AND OTHER CONVERTIBLE SECURITIES THAT ARE OR MAY BE AVAILABLE FOR FUTURE SALE AND THE SALE OF THESE SHARES MAY DEPRESS THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK.
 
We had 24,376,887 shares of common stock outstanding as of April 12, 2007, and we had convertible notes which require the issuance of 5,336,740 additional shares of common stock pursuant to our May and October 2005 private placements and  July 2006  note issuances, in which the conversion price has been adjusted resulting from the February 20, 2007 issuance of $3,734,040 Secured Convertible Promissory Notes, convertible into 8,297,867 additional shares of common stock at $0.45 per common share. Additionally, warrants which require the issuance of 10,494,131 additional shares of common stock pursuant to our November 2004, and February, May, and October 2005 private placements and 2006 note issuances. Further, we issued 16,959,726 warrants in connection with the February 20, 2007 issuance of $3,734,040 Secured Convertible Promissory Notes. Further, we often issue common stock and warrants in exchange for fees and services at a discount to the market price of our common stock at the time of such issuance. This results in a large number of shares, which have been issued, a large number of shares underlying our warrants and other convertible securities that are or may be available for future sale, and may create an overhang of securities for sale. The sale of these shares which were or will be issued upon exercise or conversion of our securities at a discount to the market price of our common stock at the time of issuance may depress the market price of our common stock and is dilutive to shareholder value.
 

 
29

 

OUR COMMON STOCK IS SUBJECT TO THE "PENNY STOCK" RULES OF THE SEC AND THE TRADING MARKET IN OUR SECURITIES IS LIMITED, WHICH MAKES TRANSACTIONS IN OUR STOCK CUMBERSOME AND MAY REDUCE THE VALUE OF AN INVESTMENT IN OUR STOCK.
 
The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which establishes the definition of a "penny stock," for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require:
 
o that a broker or dealer approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks; and
 
o the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.
 
In order to approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must:
 
o obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the person; and
 
o make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.
 
The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the Commission relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form:
 
o sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and
 
o that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.
 
Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the "penny stock" rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of our common stock and cause a decline in the market value of our stock.
 
Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.

 

 
30

 

Item 7.  Financial Statements.

Index to Financial Statements
 
   
 
Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
F-1
   
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 (Restated)
F-2
   
Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 (Restated)
F-3
   
Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Deficiency for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 (Restated)
F-4
   
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 (Restated)
F-5
   
Notes to Financial Statements as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 (Restated)
F-6
 

 
31

 
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Airtrax, Inc.
 
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Airtrax, Inc. (the "Company") as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 (both as restated) and the related statements of operations, changes in stock holders' deficiency and cash flows for the two years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 (both as restated). These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate under the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, based on our audits, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Airtrax, Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and 2005   (both as restated), and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 (both as restated) in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
 
As detailed in Note 2 to the financial statements, factors were discovered which caused restatements of the financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2006, and for the restatement of the stockholders’ equity section of the balance sheet as of January 1, 2005.
 
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As shown in the accompanying financial statements, at December 31, 2006, the Company had a working capital deficiency of $ 1.2 million as well as an accumulated deficit of $ 26.4 million. In addition, the Company has had a continuing record of losses. These factors among other things discussed in the notes to the financial statements, raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts or classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue in operation.
 
/s/ Robert G. Jeffrey, Certified Public Accountant
February 9, 2008
Wayne, New Jersey

 
 
F-1

 
 
AIRTRAX, INC.
Balance Sheets
December 31, 2006 and 2005
(Restated)
 
   
2006
   
2005
 
ASSETS
         
Current Assets
           
    Cash
  $ 327,737     $ 19,288  
    Accounts receivable
    50,704       94,357  
    Inventory
    1,049,457       2,005,139  
    Vendor advance s
    103,628       163,517  
    Deferred tax asset
    919,889       977,302  
Total current assets
    2,451,415       3,259,603  
                 
Fixed Assets
    623,136       492,779  
Less: accumulated depreciation
    (339,216 )     (301,886 )
Net fixed assets
    283,920       190,893  
Other Assets
               
    Advances to Filco GmBH
    -       2,000,000  
    Patents – net
    148,151       154,263  
    Deferred financing costs and other
    133,918       337, 856  
Total other assets
    282,069       2,492,119  
          TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 3,017,404     $ 5,942,615  
                 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY
               
                 
Current Liabilities
               
    Accounts payable
  $ 1,097,361     $ 885,463  
    Accrued liabilities
    437,140       266,556  
    Shareholder loans payable
    75,713       186,961  
    Current portion-convertible debt, net of discount
    1,830,200       -  
    Derivative liability-warrants and conversion privileges
    236,144       1,620,683  
                 
Total current liabilities
    3,676,558       2,959,663  
                 
Long Term Convertible Debt, net of discount
    531,542       1,338,525  
      -       -  
          TOTAL LIABILITIES
    4,208,100       4,298,188  
                 
Stockholders’ Deficiency
               
Preferred stock – authorized; 5,000,000 shares, no par value, 275,000 issued and outstanding
    12,950       12,950  
Common stock – authorized, 100,000,000 shares; no par value, issued and outstanding –  24,260,352 and  21,939,360, respectively
    21,520,559       18,426,605  
Paid in capital – options
    1,407,299       1330948  
Paid in capital – warrants
    2,315,935       2,051,118  
Accumulated deficit
    (26,447,439 )     (20,177,194 )
Total stockholders’ deficiency
    (1,190,696 )     1,644,427  
                 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY
  $ 3,017,404     $ 5,942,615  
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
 
 
 
F-2

 
 
AIRTRAX, INC.
Statements of Operations
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005
(Restated)
 
             
   
2006
   
2005
 
             
Revenues
  $ 1,346,913     $ 718,842  
Cost of sales
    1,470,542       729,080  
Gross profit
    (123,629 )     (10,238 )
                 
Operating and administrative expenses
               
General and Administrative costs
    3,943,632       4,677,340  
Impairment of Filco advances
    2,000,000       4,700,839  
                 
   Total Operating Expenses
    5,943,632       9,378,179  
                 
Operating loss
    (6,067,261 )     (9,388,417 )
                 
Other income/expense , net
               
Interest expense
    (230,149 )     (90,597 )
Revaluation income
    1,412,143       68,481  
Amortization of financing costs
    (251,438 )     (773,673 )
Amortization of debt discount
    (648,440 )     (1,757,386 )
Liquidated damages
    (214,247 )     -  
Settlement expenses
    (290,801 )     (281,281 )
Other income
    (2,255 )     31,741  
     Other income/expense , net
    (225,187 )     (2,802,715 )
                 
Net loss before taxes
    (6,292,448 )     (12,191,132 )
                 
Income tax benefit (State): Current
    437,803       867,413  
                 
Net loss before dividends
    (5,854,645 )     (11,323,719 )
                 
Deemed dividends on preferred stock
    303,100       274,978  
                 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
    (6,157,745 )     (11,598,697 )
                 
Preferred stock dividends paid
    (112,500 )     (51,563 )
                 
Deficit  attributable to common stockholders
  $ (6,270,245 )   $ (11,650,260 )
                 
      -       -  
Net loss per share - basic and diluted
               
                 
Loss attributable to common stockholders
  $ (6,157,745 )   $ (11,598,697 )
                 
Adjustment for preferred stock dividends accumulated
    (68,750 )     (68,750 )
                 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
  $ (6,226,495 )   $ (11,667,447 )
                 
Net loss per share - basic and diluted
  $ (0.27 )   $ (0.56 )
                 
Weighted average shares outstanding
    23,055,578       20,951,187  
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
 
 
 
F-3

 

AIRTRAX, INC.
Statements of Changes in Stock holders’ Deficiency
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005
(Restated)
 
                                                 
   
Common Shares
   
Common Amount
   
Preferred Shares
   
Preferred Amount
   
Paid in Capital Warrants
   
Paid in Capital Options
   
Accumulated Deficit
   
Total
 
                                                 
 Balance at January 1, 2005 (RESTATED)
    15,089,342       9,368,534       275,000       12,950       1,454,320       -       (8,526,934 )     2,308,870  
                                                                 
 Shares issued in  private placement
    68,750       55,000       -       -       -       -       -       55,000  
 Warrants issued with convertible debt
    -       -       -       -       777,798       -       -       777,798  
 Warrants exercised
    593,000       718,486       -       -       -       -       -       718,486  
 Options issued
    -       -       -       -       -       1,330,948       -       1,330,948  
 Options exercised
    45,000       19,619       -       -       -       -       -       19,619  
 Shares issued for services
    291,695       735,387       -       -       -       -       -       735,387  
 Employee stock awards
    20,000       48,000       -       -       -       -       -       48,000  
 Shares issued in lieu of rent
    19,200       48,000       -       -       -       -       -       48,000  
 Issuance of shares sold in prior year
    1,749,827       1,401,172       -       -       -       -       -       1,401,172  
 Shares issued in settlement of interest
    28,453       66,295       -       -       -       -       -       66,295  
 Reclass liability on exercise of
warrants
    -       181,000       -       -       (181,000 )     -       -       -  
 Conversion of convertible debt
    3,846,154       5,000,000       -       -       -       -       -       5,000,000  
 Shares issued for Filco investment
    187,939       458,571       -       -       -       -               458,571  
 Dividends on preferred stock
    -       -       -       -       -       -       (51,563 )     (51,563 )
 Restatement of preferred stock
dividend
    -       326,541       -       -       -       -       -       326,541  
 Net Loss
    -               -       -       -       -       (11,598,697 )     (11,598,697 )
                                                                 
 Balance at December 31, 2005 (RESTATED)
    21,939,360     $ 18,426,605       275,000       12,950     $ 2,051,118     $ 1,330,948     $ (20,177,194 )   $ 1,644,427  
                                                                 
Warrants issued with convertible debt
      -       -       -       264,817       -       -       264,817  
 Employee stock awards
    75,000       115,470       -       -       -       -       -       115,470  
 Shares issued for services
    651,257       859,856       -       -       -       -       -       859,856  
 Shares issued to directors
    145,000       222,500       -       -       -       -       -       222,500  
 Shares issued in settlement of interest
    49,081       66,516       -       -       -       -       -       66,516  
 Shares issued in settlement of Note
default
    184,000       93,490       -       -       -       -       -       93,490  
 Conversion of convertible debt
    761,952       1,138,012       -       -       -       -       -       1,138,012  
 Options issued
            -       -       -       -       76,351       -       76,351  
 Shares issued for preferred dividend
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -  
 Shares issued for cash
    35,723       65,500       -       -       -       -       -       65,500  
 Proceeds from warrant extensions
      117,000                               -       -       117,000  
 Dividends on preferred stock
    418,979       415,610       -       -       -       -       (112,500 )     303,110  
 Net Loss
    -       -       -       -       -       -       (6,157,745 )     (6,157,745 )
                                                                 
 Balance at December 31, 2006 (RESTATED)
    24,260,352       21,520,559       275,000       12,950       2,315,935       1,407,299       (26,447,439 )     (1,190,696 )
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
 
 
 
F-4

 

AIRTRAX, INC.
Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005
(Restated)
 
             
   
2006
   
2005
 
             
Net loss
  $ (6,157,745 )   $ (11,598,697 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
               
used in operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    69,019       59,500  
  Amortization of debt financing fees
    251,438       773,673  
Amortization of debt discounts
    648,440       1,757,386  
Impairment of Filco advances
    2,000,000       4,700,839  
Common stock issued in settlement of liabilities
    93,490       149,589  
Equity securities issued for services
    1,274,177       1,918,750  
Expense of settling liquidated damages
    183,572       -  
Deemed dividend on preferred stock
    303,100       274,978  
Increase in accrual of deferred tax benefit
    7,413       (752,888 )
Revaluation of liabilities for warrants and conversion privileges
    (1,412,143 )     (68,481 )
Common stock issued to settle Interest liability
    66,464       -  
Interest accrual on shareholder loan & other
    7,136       4,015  
                 
Changes in assets liabilities
               
Increase in accounts receivable
    43,653       (94,357 )
Increase in vendor advances
    59,889       (111,500 )
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable
    211,898       490,504  
Increase in inventory
    955,682       (1,295,858 )
Increase (decrease) in accrued liabilities
    524,984       90,672  
                 
Net cash used in operating activities
    (869,533 )     (3,701,875 )
                 
                 
Acquisition of equipment
    (151,577 )     (150,806 )
Additions to patent cost
    (6,800 )     (42,861 )
Advances to Filco GmbH
    -       (3,605,881 )
      (158,377 )     (3,799,548 )
                 
                 
Proceeds from convertible debt
    1,219,800       4,277,500  
Proceeds from the sale of common stock
    65,500       55,000  
Proceeds from convertible loans
    -       1,659,138  
Proceeds from warrant exercises & extensions
    117,000       718,486  
Proceeds from exercise of options
    -       19,619  
Preferred stock dividends paid in cash
    -       -  
Proceeds from notes payable to related parties
    35,000       151,493  
Payment of notes payable to related parties
    (100,941 )     (2,002 )
Net cash provided by financing activities
    1,336,359       6,879,234  
                 
Net increase (decrease) in cash
    308,449       (622,189 )
      19,288       641,477  
    $ 327,737     $ 19,288  
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 
 
F-5

 

NOTE 1- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
The accompanying audited financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in conformity to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.
 
Business
 
The Company was formed April 17, 1997. It has designed a lift truck vehicle using omni-directional technology obtained under a contract with the United States Navy Surface Warfare Center in Panama City, Florida. The right to exploit this technology grew out of a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement with the Navy. Significant resources have been devoted during prior years to the construction of a prototype of this omni-directional forklift vehicle. The Company recognized its first revenues from sales of this product during the year 2005.
 
Development Stage Accounting
 
In prior periods the Company was a development stage company, as defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 7 (SFAS 7). The Company became an operational company in 2005.
 
The Company has incurred losses since its inception. Until the end of 2004, these losses were financed by private placements of equity securities. During 2005 and 2006, the Company obtained financing almost exclusively from the issuance of convertible debentures. The Company will need to raise additional capital through the issuance of debt or equity securities to continue to fund operations.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
The Company considers cash deposits and short term debt securities that can be redeemed on demand and investments that have original maturities of less than three months to be cash equivalents.
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
The Company’s financial instruments are cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and notes payable, and the related security issuances.  The recorded values of these financial instruments approximate their fair values based on their short-term nature.  The recorded values of notes payable approximate their fair values, as interest approximates market rates.
 
Concentrations of Credit Risk
 
Financial instruments subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk.  The Company places its cash and temporary cash investments with credit quality institutions.  At times, such investments may be in excess of applicable government mandated insurance limits.  With respect to accounts receivable, the Company limits credit risk by performing ongoing credit evaluations.  Management does not believe significant risk exists in connection with the Company’s concentrations of credit at December 31, 2006.
 
Accounts Receivable
 
The Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts (when necessary) equal to the estimated uncollectible amounts.  The Company’s estimate is based on historical collection experience and a review of the current status of trade accounts receivable.  It is reasonably possible that the Company’s estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts will change.  As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, there were no allowances for doubtful accounts.
 
F-6

 
Inventories
 
Inventory consists principally of component parts and supplies used to assemble lift truck vehicles. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (determined on a first in-first out basis) or market.
 
Fixed Assets
 
Fixed assets, consisting of office furniture and equipment, demo and shop equipment along with castings and tools, are recorded at cost. The cost of developing and constructing the prototype omni-directional helicopter handling vehicle and the omni-directional lift truck vehicle is expensed as incurred. Expenditures for major additions and improvements are capitalized and minor replacements, maintenance, and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.  When property and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in the results of operations for the respective period.  Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the related assets ranging from 5 to 7 years using the straight-line method for financial statement purposes.
 
Intangibles
 
The Company incurred costs to acquire certain patent rights. These costs are capitalized and are being amortized over a period of fifteen years on a straight line basis.
 
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards  No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” the Company reviews intangibles for impairment annually, or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the Company's business enterprise below its carrying value. The impairment test requires the Company to estimate the fair value of the Company's overall business enterprise down to the reporting unit level. The Company performs its annual impairment test in its fiscal fourth quarter. No impairment charges related to goodwill or other intangibles were recorded in the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.
 
The Company continually evaluates whether events and changes in circumstances warrant revised estimates of useful lives or recognition of an impairment loss of our intangibles, which as of December 31, 2006, consist mainly of patents and licensing agreements.  The conditions that would trigger an impairment assessment of our intangible assets include a significant, sustained negative trend in our operating results or cash flows, a decrease in demand for our products, a change in the competitive environment and other industry and economic factors.
 
Deferred Financing Costs
 
Deferred financing costs represent legal, commitment; processing, consulting, and other fees associated with the issuance of the Company’s debt.  Deferred financing costs are being amortized over the term of the related debt.
 
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets  
 
Pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets”, the Company continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of long-lived assets may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized when expected cash flows are less than the asset's carrying value. Accordingly, when indicators of impairment are present, the Company evaluates the carrying value of such assets in relation to the operating performance and future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying assets. The Company’s policy is to record an impairment loss when it is determined that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Impairment charges of $2,000,000 were recorded for the year ended December 31, 2006, while impairment charges of $4,700,839 were recorded for the year ended December 31, 2005 related to the write down of the Filco advances.
 
F-7

 
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimated.
 
Revenue Recognition
 
Revenue on product sales is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, such as when a purchase order or contract is received from the customer, the price is fixed, title to the goods has changed and there is a reasonable assurance of collection of the sales proceeds. The Company obtains written purchase authorizations from customers for a specified amount of product at a specified price and considers delivery to have occurred at the time of shipment. Revenue is recognized at shipment, and where the following criteria are met; persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred; the sales price is fixed or determinable; and collectability is reasonably assured.
 
Revenue from services is recognized when the service is performed, and where the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; the contract price is fixed or determinable; and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue from research and development activities relating to firm fixed-price contracts is generally recognized as billing occurs. Revenue from research and development activities relating to cost-plus-fee contracts include costs incurred plus a portion of estimated fees or profits based on the relationship of costs incurred to total estimated costs. Contract costs include all direct material and labor costs and an allocation of allowable indirect costs as defined by each contract, as periodically adjusted to reflect revised agreed upon rates. These rates are subject to audit by the other party. Amounts can be billed on a bi-monthly basis. Billing is based on subjective cost investment factors.
 
Advertising Costs
 
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred.  There were no advertising costs incurred during 2006 and 2005.
 
Accounting for Income Taxes
 
As part of the process of preparing our financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes. This process involves estimating our actual current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences may result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheet. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income. If there is not persuasive evidence that recovery will occur, we would establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or increase this allowance in a period, the value of the benefit of the tax deferral is reduced or eliminated.
 
F-8

 
Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. We have recorded a valuation allowance of $8,257,629 as of December 31, 2006, due to uncertainties related to our ability to utilize some of our deferred tax assets, primarily consisting of certain net operating losses carried forward before they expire and certain accrued expenses, which are deferred for income tax purposes until paid. The valuation allowance is based on our estimates of taxable income and the period over which our deferred tax assets will be recoverable. The net deferred tax asset as of December 31, 2006 was $ 919,889, net of the valuation allowance.
 
Accounting for Derivatives
 
The Company’s issuances of convertible debt are accompanied by other financial instruments. These financial instruments include warrants to purchase stock, and the right to convert debt to stock at specified rates (“conversion benefits.”). Pursuant to SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended (SFAS 133), and EITF Issue No. 00-19, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, A Company’s Own Stock (EITF 00-19),  the Company has identified certain embedded and freestanding derivative instruments. Generally, where the ability to physical or “net-share” settle an embedded conversion option or free standing financial instrument is not deemed to be within the control of the Company, the embedded conversion option is required to be bifurcated or separated, and both the freestanding instruments and bifurcated conversion feature are accounted for as derivative liabilities. At each reporting date, the Company estimates the fair values of all derivatives, and changes in the fair value are reported in the statement of operations.
 
Under EITF 00-19, warrants are considered free-standing instruments in that they are legally detachable and separately exercisable. The conversion benefits, which are embedded in these debt issues, derive value from the relationship between the stock price and debt conversion price, and are considered embedded derivatives under the provisions of SFAS 133. The fair values of both the warrants and conversion benefits are calculated using a Black Scholes Model, taking into consideration factors such as the underlying price of the common stock, the exercise price for warrants or the conversion price for the conversion benefit, the stock volatility, and the risk-free interest rates available for comparable time periods.
 
Free-standing instruments (warrants), and embedded derivatives (conversion benefits) which are initially bifurcated or separated from the host financial instrument, are recorded as separate liabilities, in cases where the security holder has a right to choose to receive a “net settlement” of cash. The identification of such net settlement provisions in one such prior convertible debt issuance with warrants resulted in the Company concluding that such warrants should have been identified as “derivatives”.  Therefore, the warrant liability related to this issuance must be recorded as a derivative liability on the Company’s restated balance sheet, and marked to market for each subsequent reporting period with any non-cash charges or credits attributed to the revised fair value of the liability being recognized through the statement of operations.
 
If the decision to settle an outstanding liability remains with the Company, the value of the warrants is recorded in an equity account. The identification of settlement provisions being controlled by the Company under certain debt issuances resulted in the Company determining that the securities should be reflected in the restated financial statements as components of equity, as compared to having been previously recorded as liabilities with non-cash charges and/or credits to operations as a result of being marked to market for each period presented.  As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company recognized and recorded the value of certain warrants as equity of $2,315,935 and $2,051,118, respectively, in the accompanying financials.
 
F-9

 
EITF 00-19-2 specifies that the contingent obligations to make future payments or otherwise transfer consideration under a registration payment arrangement, whether issued as a separate agreement, or included as a provision of a financial instrument or other agreement, should be separately recognized and measured in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies” (SFAS 5).  EITF 00-19-2 also requires additional disclosure regarding the nature of any registration payment arrangements, alternative settlement methods, the maximum potential amount of consideration and the current carrying amount of the liability, if any. The Company adopted the provisions of EITF 00-19-2 for the reporting period beginning January 1, 2007..
 
The Company also previously sold stock units which included warrants along with common stock. In these cases, a portion of the proceeds equal to the value of the warrants is allocated to the warrants with the balance allocated to the stock. In such cases, the values of the warrants are treated as liabilities or equity, depending on whether the issuance documents contain “net cash settlement” provisions.  For those warrants that are treated as liabilities, the liabilities are revalued at the end of each reporting period with any change in value being recognized currently as a non-cash charge and/or credit to operations. When a warrant classified as a liability is exercised or canceled, the fair value of the warrant, as determined at the time of exercise or cancellation, is transferred to equity and is no longer revalued. A similar adjustment is made for a conversion benefit classified as a liability when the debt is converted to stock, or canceled.
 
For embedded and free standing derivatives valued as of  December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company has recognized in the statement of operations, revaluation income <expense>  of $ 1,412,143 and  $  68,481, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005. In addition, the Company recognized a derivative liability in the accompanying balance sheet for conversion benefits and warrants of $236,144 in 2006 and $1,620,683 in 2005.
 
To the extent that the initial fair values of the bifurcated and/or freestanding derivative liabilities exceed the net proceeds received, an immediate charge to the statement of operations is recognized for the excess. The remainder of the discount from the face value of the convertible debt resulting from allocating part or all of the proceeds to the derivative liabilities is amortized over the life of the instrument through periodic charges to the statements of operations, using the straight line method, which was the most systematic and rational approach that approximated the interest method of amortization due to the short two year amortization term of the debt.
 
The estimated fair values of derivatives have been calculated based on the Black-Scholes Model, using the following assumptions as of December 31:
 
   
2006
   
2005 
 
 Fair Value of stock    
$
.0.47
 
$
2.30
 
 Exercise Price    
$
 1.56-$1.65
 
$
1.30-$2.00
 
 Dividend Yield     
 
  None
   
None
 
 Risk Free Interest Rate 
 
  4.63%-5.10%
   
3.76%-4.10%
 
 Expected Volatility    
 
  89.25%-91.23%
   
88.13%-92.72%
 
 Expected Life-Years 
 
  2.5-3.5
   
.7-2.1
 
 
F-10

 
Stock Based Compensation
 
Common Stock for Services
 
Because of the significant liquidity issues the Company has faced since our inception, the Company has issued common stock to third party vendors and others in return for product, services, and as dividends on the preferred stock. These issuances are assigned values equal to the value of the common stock on the earlier of the dates of issuance, or the dates on which a commitment is made to provide compensation in the form of equity securities, whichever date is earlier. Such issuances are recorded as expenses in the periods in which the stock is issued, unless the right to the stock has not fully vested, in which case the expense is recorded in the periods of vesting.  During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company issued an aggregate of 871,257 and 330,895 shares, respectively, of common stock representing a value of services of $1,197,826 and $ 836,500, respectively, to third parties in exchange for services performed.  
 
Stock Options
 
Stock options are awarded to employees as compensation for services. Such awards have been immediately exercisable. The Company adopted SFAS 123R, “Share Based Payment” (SFAS 123R), and SFAS 148, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure” (SFAS 148) on January 1, 2006. Prior to 2006, these awards were accounted for under the intrinsic method as permitted by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No.  25. Since the time of adopting SFAS 123R, the option awards have been valued at their grant-date fair value as determined through the use of the Black Scholes Model.
 
The following presents information ($000 omitted) about the net loss and loss per share of the year 2005, as if the Company had applied the provisions of SFAS 123R and 148 to all options granted during the year 2005.
 
Net loss as reported
 
$
(15,210
)
Less: Stock-based employee compensation
       
determined under the Intrinsic Method
   
1,082
 
Add: Stock bases compensation determined
       
under the Fair Value Method
   
(1,105
)
Pro forma net loss
 
$
(15,233
)
Loss per share:
       
Basic and diluted as reported
 
$
(.73
)
Basic and diluted-pro forma
 
$
(.73
)
 
Pursuant to the requirements of SFAS 123R, the weighted average fair value of options granted during 2006 and 2005, as determined on the dates of grant, were $ .25 and $1.37, respectively. The fair values were determined using a Black Scholes Model, based on the following major assumptions:
 
   
2006
   
2005
 
             
Volatility
    89.88 %     91.10 %
Risk-free interest rate
    4.25 %     3.71 %
                 
Expected Life – years
    3.33       4.52  
 
Warrants
 
The Company has issued warrants both as part of “stock units”, and as an integral part of convertible note issues.  The value of the warrants and conversion options which are classified as liabilities are revalued each reporting period.  These values are determined by a Black Scholes Model.  Most of these issuances contain Registration Payment Arrangements (RPAs), which impose liquidated damages under certain circumstances.  EITF 00-19-2 specifies the accounting treatment for derivatives that contain RPA’s and provides guidance on accounting for potential obligations of the PRA’s.  The accounting treatment of derivatives will not change as a result of EITF 00-19-2 as the “RPAs” were not the sole determining factor in prior decisions about derivative classification. The following is a schedule of changes in warrants outstanding through December 31, 2006.  Each of these warrants is exercisable over five year periods from dates of issuance at prices ranging from $0.45-$1.56 per share.
 
F-11

 
Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share
 
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.  128, “Earnings Per Share” (SFAS 128), and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No.  98 (SAB 98), both basic and diluted earnings/loss per share (“EPS”) are presented on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS is computed similarly to basic EPS, except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were not anti-dilutive. The Company has excluded all common stock equivalents arising from outstanding options, warrants, convertible preferred stock and convertible debt from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because these securities are anti-dilutive. During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had approximately 23,055,578 and 20,951,187 weighted average number of shares, respectively, outstanding and used in both the Basic and Diluted EPS calculation.
 
Segment Reporting
 
Management treats the operations of the Company as one single segment.
 
Reclassifications
 
Certain amounts in the 2005 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2006 financial statement presentation.
 
NOTE 2- RESTATEMENTS
 
In conjunction with our independent registered public accounting firm and professional advisors, the Company conducted an analysis of our various financial instruments and agreements involving convertible debt and common stock financings accompanied by warrants, with a particular focus on the accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 133”), the Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF Issue No. 00-19, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock (“EITF 00-19”), and FASB Staff Position No. EITF 00-19-2, “Accounting for Registration Payment Arrangements” (“EITF 00-19-2”), (collectively, the “Derivative Accounting Pronouncements”). Accordingly, certain accounting policies we previously considered to reflect what was deemed to be appropriate at the time when the financings were previously reported, have been modified by recent interpretations, including the Derivative Accounting Pronouncements.
 
On November 2, 2007, as a result of this analysis, the Company filed  a Form 8-K noting that its previously filed financial statements in the annual reports for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 filed on Form 10-KSB, together with the quarterly reports on Form 10-QSB for the quarters ending March 31, 2005, June 30, 2005, September 30, 2005, March 31, 2006, June 30, 2006, September 30, 2006, March 31, 2007, June 30, 2007 and September 30, 2007(collectively, the “Reports”) could no longer be relied upon.  The Company sent a formal letter request to the Office of the Chief Accountant (OCA) of the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) dated December 17, 2007,  petitioning the OCA to waive  the requirement to file separate amended and restated Reports for the periods  noted above, and instead, file a comprehensive amended and restated  comparative Form 10-KSB for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, along with certain comprehensive financial information and disclosures for 2004, and comprehensive amended and restated  comparative Form 10-QSBs for the periods ended March 31, 2007, June 30, 2007, and September 30, 2007 along with certain comprehensive financial information and disclosures for 2005. Such waiver was received from the OCA on December 27, 2007.
 
The restatement is required to properly reflect the Company’s financial results for certain non-cash, and non-operational related charges or credits to earnings associated with both embedded and freestanding derivative liabilities, and the accounting for certain derivatives under the control of the issuer due to the revised interpretation and implementation of the Derivative Accounting Pronouncements.
 
The Company has made adjustments to its accounting records in the restated amounts to more fully comply with requirements of the Derivative Accounting Pronouncements, and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) dealing with derivatives.  Among these adjustments were reductions in the balances of derivative liabilities, offset by reductions in the amounts of debt discount, the amounts of paid in capital-warrants, revaluation income, and common stock.  The adjustments to the common stock were caused by the elimination of credits to common stock that had resulted principally from the erroneous recognition of liabilities for conversion privileges upon issuances of convertible debt.  These credits were erroneously transferred to pay in capital upon debt conversion.  Other partial offsets to these adjustments affected the amounts of amortization expense and paid in capital-warrants.
F-12

 
The effects of these changes on the Company’s previously issued audited December 31, 2006 and 2005 financial statements and the related disclosures included elsewhere in the notes to consolidated financial statements, along with the comprehensive disclosures of the restated balance sheet as of December 31, 2004, are as follows:
 
The effect on the Company's previously issued audited December 31, 2006 and 2005 financial statements are summarized below:
 
Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2006
   
Previously
   
Increase
   
As
 
   
Reported
   
(decrease)
   
Reported
 
                   
  Deferred financing fees
  $ -     $ 133,853
(1) 
  $ 133,853  
                         
  Total assets
  $ 2,883,551     $ 133,853     $ 3,017,404  
                         
      Current portion-convertible debt, net of discounts
  $ 2,129,797     $ (299,597
)  (1)  
  $ 1,830,200  
                         
      Obligations for outstanding options
    1,407,299       (1,407,299 )  (2)          
                         
      Derivative liability-warrants and conversion priviledges
    316,958       (80,814 )  (3)      236,144  
 
                       
 Accrued liabilities
    461,973       24,833       437,140  
                         
Total current liabilities
    5,489,101       (1,812,543 ) (16)      3,676,558  
                         
      Long term-convertible debt, net of discounts
    557,797       (26,255 )  (1)       531,542  
                         
Total liabilities
    6,046,898       (1,838,798 )     4,208,100  
                         
Common stock
    25,133,164       (3,612,605)   (4)      21,520,559  
                         
Paid in capital-options
    -       1,407,299   (2)     1,407,299  
                         
  Paid in capital-warrants
    1,194,725       1,121,210   (5)     2,315,935  
                         
Accumulated deficit
    (29,504,186 )     3,056,747   (6)     (26,447,439 )
                         
  Total stockholders' deficiency
    (3,163,347 )     1,972,651       (1,190,696 )
                         
      Total Liabilities and stockholders' deficiency
  $ 2,883,551     $ (133,853 )   $ 3,017,404  
                         
                         
Statement of Operations December 31, 2006
                       
                         
   
Previously
   
Increase
   
As
 
   
Reported
   
(decrease)
   
Reported
 
                         
      General and administrative costs
  $ (4,686,763 )   $ 743,131   (14)   $ (3,943,632 )
Operating loss
    (6,810,392 )     743,131       (6,067,261 )
                         
  Other Income and Expenses
                       
Conversion expense
    (1,009,069 )     1,009,069   (11)     -  
Revaluation income
    3,534,179       (2,122,036 ) (13)     1,412,143  
     Amortization of financing costs
    -       (251,438 (9)     (251,438 )
     Amortization of debt discounts
    -       (648,440 ) (10)     (648,440 )
Liquidated damages
    -       (214,247 ) (14)     (214,247 )
Settlement expenses
    -       (290,801 (14)     (290,801 )
                         
Net loss before taxes
    (4,517,686 )     (1,774,762 )     (6,292,448 )
                         
      Net loss attributable to common stockolders
  (4,382,983 )   (1,774,762 )   (6,157,745 )
                         
      Loss per share-basic and diluted
  $ (0.19   $ (0.08 )   $ (0.27 )
                         
                         
Statement of Cash Flows, Decmber 31, 2006
                       
                         
   
Previously
   
Increase
   
As
 
   
Reported
   
(decrease)
   
Reported
 
                         
Net loss
  $ (4,382,983 )   $ (1,774,762 )   $ (6,157,745 )
                         
Amortization of financing costs
    -       251,438    (9)     251,438  
Amortization of debt discounts
    -       648,440   (10)     648,440  
Cost of Conversion
    961,569       (961,569 ) (11)     -  
    Cost of settling liquidated damages
    424,426       (240,854 ) (15)     183,572  
Increase in accrued liabilities
    569,713       (44,729 )     524,984  
    Revaluation of derivative liability-warrants and
                       
conversion priviledges
    (3,534,179 )     2,122,036   (13)     (1,412,143 )
                         
    Net cash used in operating activities
  $ (869,533 )   $ -     $ (869,533 )
 
 
F-13

 
Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2005
 
   
Previously
   
Increase
   
As
 
   
Reported
   
(decrease)
   
Reported
 
                   
Deferred financing fees
  $ 388,392     $ (50,601 ) (1)   $ 337,791  
                         
Total assets
  $ 5,993,216     $ (50,601 )   $ 5,942,615  
                         
     Obligations for outstanding options
  $ 1,330,948     $ (1,330,948 ) ( 2)   $ -  
                         
     Derivative liability-warrants and conversion priviledges
    3,516,462       (1,895,779 ) ( 3)     1,620,683  
                         
   Total current liabilities
    6,186,390       (3,226,727 )       2,959,663  
                         
     Long term-convertible debt, net of discounts
    2,048,000       (709,475 )  ( 1)     1,338,525  
                         
   Total liabilities
    8,234,390       (3,936,202 )       4,298,188  
                         
   Common stock
    21,712,179       (3,285,574 )  ( 4)     18,426,605  
                         
   Paid in capital-options
    -       1,330,948    (2)     1,330,948  
                         
Paid in capital-warrants
    1,042,400       1,008,718    (5)     2,051,118  
                         
  Accumulated deficit
    (25,008,703 )     4,831,509    (6)     (20,177,194 )
                         
Total stockholders' deficiency
    (2,241,174 )     3,885,601    (7)     1,644,427  
                         
    Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
  $ 5,993,216     $ (50,601 )   $ 5,942,615  
                         
                         
                         
Statement of Operations December 31, 2005
                       
                         
   
Previously
   
Increase
   
As